Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Uncommitted

HIGH SCHOOL

Brock Harris

Tight End

6′6″ / 238 lbs

Saint George, UT

Pine View

Class of 2026

BrockHarris2026

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: 92.9

School Preferences

Texas A&M

Medium

Arizona

Medium

BYU

Medium

Miami

Medium

Oregon

Medium

Oregon State

Medium

Utah

Medium

+ 2 More

Videos

(1 Total)

Updates

1 yr ago by Jason Howell

Weekend Recruiting Thread - March 29-30

As always we expect a few alterations to this list. There will be additions and there will be subtractions but this is what we have at this time and we will continue to update the list as we get confirmations.March 27TE Hayden Bradley, Buford (GA) - March 27-29LB Mason Posa, Albuquerque (NM) La Cueva - March 27-??March 302025s RB Deondrae Riden, DeSoto (TX) - Texas A&M commitLB Kelvion Riggins, Forney (TX) - Texas A&M commitCB Deyjhon Pettaway...

1 yr ago by Jason Howell

Thursday morning recruiting notes

We will post our full confirmed list later today or tomorrow, but know this is shaping up to be a very big weekend. I have confirmed a few more big additions to the list. Shreveport (LA) Calvary Baptist running back James Simon has confirmed he will be in town this weekend. He is considered one of the top backs in the nation and he was one of the most impressive campers through A&M this summer. He has a long football lineage, his dad John was a standout at La...

Follow TexAgs

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”