Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Committed

HIGH SCHOOL

Jordan Burnett

Offensive Lineman

6′4″ / 275 lbs

Missouri City, TX

Ft Bend Ridge Point

Class of 2026

jordanburnett72

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

TCU

Committed

3/10/2025

Arkansas State

None

Pittsburgh

None

Tulsa

None

UTEP

None

UTSA

None

Vanderbilt

None

+ 2 More

Videos

(3 Total)

Updates

8 days ago by Jason Howell

Around Texas: A round-up of recruiting news in the Lone Star State

The February signing period is in the past as the 2026 recruiting class is taking center stage with new prospects emerging all over the state of Texas. It is time to take a look at the latest happenings in the Lone Star state on the recruiting front.

Highlights: Ridge Point pulls away from Bridgeland on Saturday night

3:28

6 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger

Highlights: Ridge Point pulls away from Bridgeland on Saturday night

Two talented rosters met at the Berry Center in Cypress on Saturday night as the Fort Bend Ridge Point Panthers took down the Bridgeland Bears. TexAgs was in attendance, and now, we bring you the highlights of the action.

Fort Bend Ridge Point outlasts Fort Bend Hightower in rivalry shootout

5:16

1 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger

Fort Bend Ridge Point outlasts Fort Bend Hightower in rivalry shootout

Fort Bend Ridge Point put up 43 points to win a wild “Battle of the Tollway” rivalry game over Fort Bend Hightower on Thursday evening. TexAgs was on hand and now brings you the top plays from the night.

Photos

(3 Total)

Follow TexAgs

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”