Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Committed

HIGH SCHOOL

Will Conroy

Offensive Lineman

6′3″ / 275 lbs

Cleveland, OH

St. Ignatius

Class of 2026

@Wconroy56

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: 89.0

School Preferences

Oklahoma

Committed

12/16/2024

Texas A&M

None

Akron

None

Arizona

None

Arizona State

None

Boston College

None

Indiana

None

Kent State

None

Kentucky

None

Miami

None

Michigan

None

Michigan State

None

Ohio State

None

Oregon

None

Purdue

None

Toledo

None

UCF

None

Virginia Tech

None

West Virginia

None

+ 14 More

Videos

(1 Total)

Updates

3 mo ago by Jason Howell

Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends

It's time to take a look around at the biggest pickups on the recruiting front as well as some of the top recruiting news and notes from around the SEC. Jason Howell details that and more in this week's Around the SEC.

11 mo ago by Jason Howell

Weekend Recruiting Thread - April 19-21

April 192025sRB Darrell Smith, Picayune (MS) MemorialWR Dillon Alfred, Saraland (AL) - Ole Miss commitWR Kenzy West, Flowood (MS) Hartfield AcademyOL Jabarius Oliver, Yazoo City (MS)LB Tyshun Willis, Camden (MS) JacksonATH (WR/DB) Amarion Brown, Yazoo City (MS)ATH (RB/LB) Desmond Johnson, Yazoo City (MS)2026sWR Aiden Knox, Clinton (MS)OL Gunnar Goodwin, Kossuth (MS)OL Felix Ojo, Mansfield (TX) Lake RidgeCB Preston Ashley, Brandon (MS) Transfer...

Follow TexAgs

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”