Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Uncommitted

HIGH SCHOOL

Trenton Henderson

Defensive End

6′4″ / 225 lbs

Pensacola, FL

Pensacola Catholic

Class of 2026

THenderson26

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: 93.1

School Preferences

Alabama

Medium

Auburn

Medium

Florida

Medium

Florida State

Medium

Georgia

Medium

LSU

Medium

Michigan

Medium

Texas

Medium

USC

Medium

Vanderbilt

Medium

Texas A&M

Low

Appalachian State

Low

Arkansas State

Low

East Carolina

Low

Mississippi State

Low

Notre Dame

Low

Ole Miss

Low

South Florida

Low

Tennessee

Low

Toledo

Low

Tulane

Low

Wisconsin

Low

+ 17 More

Videos

(2 Total)

Updates

16 days ago by Jason Howell

Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends

It's time to take a look around at the biggest pickups on the recruiting front as well as some of the top recruiting news and notes from around the SEC. Jason Howell details that and more in this week's Around the SEC.

1 mo ago by Jason Howell

Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends

7 mo ago by Cade Draughon

Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 7/27-8/2

2025TE Vander Ploog, Fullerton (CA) Troy (Washington commit)- Offer Date: July 30https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16443328/64ea3d9e0c5de506985b99692026OL Da'Ron Parks, Hurricane (WV) Hurricane - Offer Date: July 28https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17472673/659c4a4c478da40f68678b90DE Trenton Henderson, Pensacola (FL) Pensacola Catholic - Offer Date: July...

Follow TexAgs

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”