Forums
Football
- News
- Schedule
- SEC Standings
- Roster
- Staff
- Class Breakdown
Recruiting
Sports
- Football
- Basketball
- Baseball
- Women's Basketball
- Soccer
- Softball
- Volleyball
Premium
Sponsors
- Sponsors
- Advertise With Us
United
More
- Podcasts
- Media
- TexAgs Radio
- Post of the Day
- iOS App
- Search
- Store
- Pick-Off
- 12th Man Foundation
- Our Staff
- Contact Us
- Help Center

subscribe subscribe

| Register

Football Recruiting

News Commits Offers Liucci 44 Rankings OOS All Recruits

Status:

Uncommitted

HIGH SCHOOL

Cullen Thompson

Defensive End

6′4″ / 220 lbs

Spring, TX

Grand Oaks

Class of 2026

_Cullenthompson

Rating: 84

#100 IN TEXAS

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Arkansas State

Medium

Army

Medium

Baylor

Medium

Mississippi State

Medium

Oklahoma State

Medium

Pittsburgh

Medium

Sacramento State

Medium

San Diego State

Medium

Tennessee State

Medium

Texas State

Medium

UNLV

Medium

UTEP

Medium

UTSA

Medium

+ 8 More

Videos

(1 Total)

Updates

2 mo ago by Jason Howell

Ranking Texas' best prospects in the 2025, 2026, 2027 & 2028 classes

The 2024 season is over, playoffs have come to completion, and All-American games have wrapped up. In the middle of football offseason, it is time to adjust to TexAgs' Top 100 rankings in the 2025, 2026 and 2027 classes, as well as offer a look at the 2028 haul.

2 mo ago by Jason Howell

Navy All-American Bowl Week Thread

Navy All-American BowlSaturday, January 111 p.m ETAlamodomeSan Antonio, TXNBCTexas A&M signees and commitsWest9 - TE Kiotti Armstrong, Jasper (TX)16 - LB Noah Mikhail, La Verne (CA) Bonita20 - CB Adonyss Currie, Lancaster (CA) Quartz Hill32 - DE Marco Jones, Danville (CA) San Ramon Valley59 - DL Chace Sims, Richmond (TX) Randle79 - OL Lamont Rogers, Mesquite (TX) HornEast4 - WR Aaron Gregory, Douglasville (GA) Douglas County (2026)2026...

Photos

(2 Total)

Follow TexAgs

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”