Those Avida rankings are very interesting, but I agree they don't mean much in their current format.
Maybe if the idea was tailored and more was taken into account, they could hold some sway. Something like the snapshot also relating to the same time in the previous season might help.
As for the duel meet rankings, they've pretty much become a farce. I've spoken to a bunch of coaches who said that when they started out they tried to keep track of times and so on, and it was (obviously) too much to do.
Now days they said they sort of look around if they have time and take an educated guess. A little scary, but maybe there's no other way....
I saw something once which had a site that attempted to take a team's best current times and (theoretically) pit them against other teams' best and in that way come up with an "in season" ranking. I don't know what happened to that, but it was a fair idea...
[This message has been edited by Aquabullet (edited 1/27/2011 8:14a).]
Maybe if the idea was tailored and more was taken into account, they could hold some sway. Something like the snapshot also relating to the same time in the previous season might help.
As for the duel meet rankings, they've pretty much become a farce. I've spoken to a bunch of coaches who said that when they started out they tried to keep track of times and so on, and it was (obviously) too much to do.
Now days they said they sort of look around if they have time and take an educated guess. A little scary, but maybe there's no other way....
I saw something once which had a site that attempted to take a team's best current times and (theoretically) pit them against other teams' best and in that way come up with an "in season" ranking. I don't know what happened to that, but it was a fair idea...
[This message has been edited by Aquabullet (edited 1/27/2011 8:14a).]