Entertainment
Sponsored by

Hulu + live TV price goes up... again.

5,390 Views | 62 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by YouBet
AggieChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I signed up at $40.99 at the beginning of football season. It went up to $50.99 a month or so ago. Just got an email that it's going up to $60.99 immediately.

Will be dropping it like a hot potato as soon as the bowl games are over.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow, huge increase. I pay less for Directv.
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dang, that's awful. The whole purpose for cutting the cord is to save money.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.
BEaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I gotta wonder if Disney is trying kill that part of Hulu
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My email said $55? Not happy about it, but still
Topher17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.
It absolutely will, but the perk of things like this and Youtube TV is I can drop it the day after the national title game and not pick it back up until September. I know some cable companies are starting to not require contracts, but this is still a major perk.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree with you. Plus, I prefer using YouTube TV's interface to the traditional outlets. Also, like the ease of switching between the various apps on my Roku vs. changing inputs.
Tobias Funke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why don't you just use my brother's account? That's what I do, and I don't get charged anything. Seems like y'all are over-complicating this.
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not trying to derail but AT&T Now did that also. Started at $45 a month in August. Bumped to $55 last month, then January was $65. Even told me I had HBO with it, but wasn't on my list of programs.

Cancelled that immediately as well. I'd avoid that if you were considering.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.


Except with cable I'm stuck with it year round. Cord cutting I pay for it when I want to use it.
WoMD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And if you travel a lot for business you can bring your tv service with you with a firestick. I do this a lot with the Airbnbs I stay at for extended work trips, using at&t now. Apparently Hulu doesn't let you do that anyway, but the others do, so screw Hulu regardless.

Maybe the cable and satellite options allow this now, I don't know, but this is a huge reason why I'm sticking with it for now.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I got the notification last month that the price would be going up today, so I cancelled it for yesterday. It's a pain, but it's well-timed at least - now all I need to do is catch a bowl game at BWW and I'm set for the year.
Vernada
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bulldog73 said:

Dang, that's awful. The whole purpose for cutting the cord is to save money.
Well - normally to save money, people recognize they have to sacrifice something.

So we have two things happening - companies realigning their businesses to get in 'cord cutters' and cord cutters that don't want to pay for cable, but still want to watch exactly what they want to watch.
zooguy96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There will always be something less expensive. Had Sling for 2 years now, and prices have stayed constant. The minute things get too high is the minute I say screw it and just use rabbit ears.

TV is just not important enough for me to spend a ton of $$ on it.
WoMD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zooguy96 said:

There will always be something less expensive. Had Sling for 2 years now, and prices have stayed constant. The minute things get too high is the minute I say screw it and just use rabbit ears.

TV is just not important enough for me to spend a ton of $$ on it.

Slings offerings are the worst and most limited of all the options, so I would hope it's the cheapest. And don't you have to use rabbit ears to watch locals with sling anyway...?
zooguy96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WoMD said:

zooguy96 said:

There will always be something less expensive. Had Sling for 2 years now, and prices have stayed constant. The minute things get too high is the minute I say screw it and just use rabbit ears.

TV is just not important enough for me to spend a ton of $$ on it.

Slings offerings are the worst and most limited of all the options, so I would hope it's the cheapest. And don't you have to use rabbit ears to watch locals with sling anyway...?


Sling has everything I watch. Rabbit ears are not a problem. Just used the old conduit from the old satellite tv and placed an exterior antenna on the pole. Problem solved.

TV is just not big on my "must haves".
AggieChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I watch absolutely ZERO live TV outside of college football. So from the last week of August through the first week of January, I'll pay it. But I won't keep it one day longer than I need.

$250/yr is better than the $1200+/yr I was on the hook for when I had cable.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.

The shift to cord-cutting was never about a way to force content providers to charge less due to "unbundling". It was a way to force content buyers to have competition, driving prices down -- which it has. When people have different options they can jump to, they are't having to pay $100+ a month on their cable bill.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Champ Bailey said:

Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.


Except with cable I'm stuck with it year round. Cord cutting I pay for it when I want to use it.
I tend to think the services that help people cord cut are going to end up with contracts at some point in the future.

Being able to rely on a constant revenue stream is much better than forecasting when people might drop their service.
The Lost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beat40 said:

Champ Bailey said:

Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.


Except with cable I'm stuck with it year round. Cord cutting I pay for it when I want to use it.
I tend to think the services that help people cord cut are going to end up with contracts at some point in the future.

Being able to rely on a constant revenue stream is much better than forecasting when people might drop their service.
Yeah, its just going to turn into cable with a roku instead of cable with a box, especially once speeds pick up and live streams aren't delayed (my biggest beef with watching football on streaming services).

There will never be ala carte channels. Netflix/Apple/Hulu etc will go to weekly releases of one episode instead of dumping all season at once to keep people subscribed/internet hype.

If you like a variety of things, you'll pay about the same, maybe even more when you consider how much you pay for internet too.

There is no winning, just hopefully a little less losing.
Ronyaria
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WoMD said:

And if you travel a lot for business you can bring your tv service with you with a firestick. I do this a lot with the Airbnbs I stay at for extended work trips, using at&t now. Apparently Hulu doesn't let you do that anyway, but the others do, so screw Hulu regardless.

Maybe the cable and satellite options allow this now, I don't know, but this is a huge reason why I'm sticking with it for now.
I agree, Firestick is really cool and convenient for this purpose. I have got one for me too, and installed some apps on it which I found at https://www.firestickhow.com/best-firestick-apps.html Now I don't need anything else, it works just great!
Dr. Horrible
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The other thing I get away from with cord cutting is the monthly fee for the boxes. It might be cheaper on one tv, but you add $20-40 for extra boxes and streaming is better again.

FWIW, I've been really happy with youtube tv ever since I lost ps vue. Especially the native integration with google home and chromecast.
evan_aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
+1 for YouTube TV too.

I like the settings to record shows. My only gripe is that the TV guide could use a little help. I want to be able to slide right and see what's coming up 6-8 hrs later at night but still haven't figured that out.
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just started Youtube tv this weekend. My reason for cable all these years has been football. Youtube has that covered now, even the SEC network, so I cut the cord. Wanted to try it out now while there are still playoff games going so I can ensure the live game watching experience is up to par.

Love that I can easily pause service anytime (offseason) and pick it up again when I want.
TMoney2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Lost said:

Beat40 said:

Champ Bailey said:

Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.


Except with cable I'm stuck with it year round. Cord cutting I pay for it when I want to use it.
I tend to think the services that help people cord cut are going to end up with contracts at some point in the future.

Being able to rely on a constant revenue stream is much better than forecasting when people might drop their service.
Yeah, its just going to turn into cable with a roku instead of cable with a box, especially once speeds pick up and live streams aren't delayed (my biggest beef with watching football on streaming services).

There will never be ala carte channels. Netflix/Apple/Hulu etc will go to weekly releases of one episode instead of dumping all season at once to keep people subscribed/internet hype.

If you like a variety of things, you'll pay about the same, maybe even more when you consider how much you pay for internet too.

There is no winning, just hopefully a little less losing.
DVR killed all of this. It doesn't matter if they go to weekly releases. Live sports are the only content where it actually matters when you watch it. It's just as easy to wait until a season of a series is over (or a couple series) and subscribe for a couple months while you watch it.

They may give discounts for yearly subscriptions, but they're not going to go back to requiring contracts because the content distributors don't have monopolies anymore. That's the only reason it worked before. You had no choice if you wanted tv in addition to broadcast. If one starts to require a contract,... they'll become much less popular.

Oversaturation is going to cause the streaming service bubble to burst, its not going to magically cause them to solidify their positions so much that they feel comfortable putting the screws to their customer base. The barriers to entry used to be 100% insurmountable, but now new streaming services can enter the market if they have the capital.

Its different from how it was. That doesn't mean that everything becomes awesome, and we get to have a la carte cable while also having a million different channels to chose from and its super cheap. It does mean that it is very unlikely that things just go back to exactly where they were 10-15 years ago. Technologies and concepts exist that didn't exist back then. Its a bad bet that things will just regress.
CoolaidWade
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder what their subscriber numbers are after football season? I plan to cancel one day after the Super Bowl.
Dad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hulu plus live TV was a disaster at my house. It was hard to use (the guide sucked) and we often would have a grainy picture for several seconds after changing channels and it would often do that or freeze up in the middle of a football game. We had zero issues with the Hulu part it was the live part that sucked.

I switched to Youtube TV over the weekend and it is a million times better. The guide works way better and the dvr is endless (Hulu deletes your stuff after a short period) and I get the nice quality picture right away when I switch channels without any issues so far. It is also $11 less than Hulu after the price hike.

I recently bought an outdoor antenna but it is still in the box because I didn't know the best way to set it up. Now I am going to try hooking it up to what my directv dish was connected to like a poster mentioned on this thread. If that works well, I am going to drop Youtube during the offseason and just use the antenna plus Hulu no ads and my cousin's cable login for espn sports.
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As soon as I catch up on Letterkenny I am ditching Hulu. It's just a clunky experience. Also getting serious about cutting the cord this year.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TMoney2007 said:

The Lost said:

Beat40 said:

Champ Bailey said:

Bo Darville said:

I Have Spoken said:

It will be right up to the old cable bill before it is all said and done.


I tried to tell cord cutters this years ago. One way or another you're going to pay for content.


Except with cable I'm stuck with it year round. Cord cutting I pay for it when I want to use it.
I tend to think the services that help people cord cut are going to end up with contracts at some point in the future.

Being able to rely on a constant revenue stream is much better than forecasting when people might drop their service.
Yeah, its just going to turn into cable with a roku instead of cable with a box, especially once speeds pick up and live streams aren't delayed (my biggest beef with watching football on streaming services).

There will never be ala carte channels. Netflix/Apple/Hulu etc will go to weekly releases of one episode instead of dumping all season at once to keep people subscribed/internet hype.

If you like a variety of things, you'll pay about the same, maybe even more when you consider how much you pay for internet too.

There is no winning, just hopefully a little less losing.
DVR killed all of this. It doesn't matter if they go to weekly releases. Live sports are the only content where it actually matters when you watch it. It's just as easy to wait until a season of a series is over (or a couple series) and subscribe for a couple months while you watch it.

They may give discounts for yearly subscriptions, but they're not going to go back to requiring contracts because the content distributors don't have monopolies anymore. That's the only reason it worked before. You had no choice if you wanted tv in addition to broadcast. If one starts to require a contract,... they'll become much less popular.

Oversaturation is going to cause the streaming service bubble to burst, its not going to magically cause them to solidify their positions so much that they feel comfortable putting the screws to their customer base. The barriers to entry used to be 100% insurmountable, but now new streaming services can enter the market if they have the capital.

Its different from how it was. That doesn't mean that everything becomes awesome, and we get to have a la carte cable while also having a million different channels to chose from and its super cheap. It does mean that it is very unlikely that things just go back to exactly where they were 10-15 years ago. Technologies and concepts exist that didn't exist back then. Its a bad bet that things will just regress.
Maybe. Everything tends to consolidate at some point. All it take is a bad economic run and the bigger fish will look to buy out the smaller fish. Plenty of historical evidence across multiple industries as support. The question is, what keeps the streaming industry from consolidating in the case of a bad economic run?

If the services start consolidating, we may not go back to contracts, but I would guarantee price increases and that people will be right back where they started.
boy09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CoolaidWade said:

I wonder what their subscriber numbers are after football season? I plan to cancel one day after the Super Bowl.
I had Sling pretty much just to get Redzone. I've already cancelled, but my billing cycle runs until the 28th. Unfortunately the last day of the NFL regular season was Dec. 29th, so i had to pay for another full month of service just to watch Redzone on the final day of the season...
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We found it hard to justify YTTV (hate the company) and Hulu-Live prices and fell to Sling for now, since PSvue's death is eminent.

After looking at our viewing all we really watch live outside of College Football season is FoxNews.
* If Fox News created an ala carte Fox News/Business channel I could probably shut down streaming live.

If we get to where we can't stand Sling I would probably have to go to YTTV even though I hate the company.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think I pay $60 for my Fubo.tv with sports package, but it's worth it.
7nine
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie-beta said:

Hulu plus live TV was a disaster at my house. It was hard to use (the guide sucked) and we often would have a grainy picture for several seconds after changing channels and it would often do that or freeze up in the middle of a football game. We had zero issues with the Hulu part it was the live part that sucked.

I switched to Youtube TV over the weekend and it is a million times better. The guide works way better and the dvr is endless (Hulu deletes your stuff after a short period) and I get the nice quality picture right away when I switch channels without any issues so far. It is also $11 less than Hulu after the price hike.

I recently bought an outdoor antenna but it is still in the box because I didn't know the best way to set it up. Now I am going to try hooking it up to what my directv dish was connected to like a poster mentioned on this thread. If that works well, I am going to drop Youtube during the offseason and just use the antenna plus Hulu no ads and my cousin's cable login for espn sports.

Having the same issue but just havne't been sure if it's Hulu or my internet. I have gig so it damn sure shouldn't be my internet.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.