Entertainment
Sponsored by

Man of Steel

3,541 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by YouBet
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Ha, circa 2013, I'm trying to think who was popular enough at the time, would have had better chemistry with Cavill than Adams, and was in her mid-to-late 20s/early 30s...

Jamie Alexander?
Jessica Biel?
Emily Blunt?
Rose Byrne?
Natalie Dormer?
Rebecca Hall?
Anne Hathaway?
Evangeline Lily?
Rachel McAdams?
Natalie Portman?
Olivia Wilde?
Mary Elizabeth Winstead?

None of those names really stick out to me, but, given the circumstances, I would taken almost any of them over Adams (who, again, I generally like, just not for this).
Carey Muligan?

rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I'm literally pulling this stuff out of my ass on the spot.


Literally?!
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Back in the late 60's the sci-if writer Larry Niven penned an essay called Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex. It's an interesting hypothetical take on what would happen between Superman and Lois Lane during sex. It's not open source but you can find it on the web if you search for it. I won't post the link in case it's still under copyright.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

So, doing some quick digging and it looks like Zoe Saldana, of all people, was Snyder's second choice for Lois. Pretty interesting what-if, and I could actually see it...


That doesn't seem to fit to me, however I pretty much never complain about her getting any role considering how gorgeous she is.

Would watch that....a lot.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rhutton125 said:

Quote:

I'm literally pulling this stuff out of my ass on the spot.


Literally?!
Yes... luckily I crap flowers, so it's pretty nice.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I agree, there was some really good casting. I definitely would have taken Smallville Lex Luther over what we got in Batman vs Superman ANY day.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasTeleAg said:

I agree, there was some really good casting. I definitely would have taken Smallville Lex Luther over what we got in Batman vs Superman ANY day.
Top 5 worst casting ever. Terrible.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you're "reinventing" Lex Luthor for a new generation, I get the impulse to make him a tech god, a la Zuckerberg, Dorsey, Musk, etc. That could have been really cool. But when you then cast the actual guy who's already famous for playing Zuckerberg, it just comes across as lazy and uninspired and completely undoes the novelty of the reinvention.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

TCTTS said:

Ha, circa 2013, I'm trying to think who was popular enough at the time, would have had better chemistry with Cavill than Adams, and was in her mid-to-late 20s/early 30s...

Jamie Alexander?
Jessica Biel?
Emily Blunt?
Rose Byrne?
Natalie Dormer?
Rebecca Hall?
Anne Hathaway?
Evangeline Lily?
Rachel McAdams?
Natalie Portman?
Olivia Wilde?
Mary Elizabeth Winstead?

None of those names really stick out to me, but, given the circumstances, I would taken almost any of them over Adams (who, again, I generally like, just not for this).
Carey Muligan?



Yeah, she could have totally worked too.
Quad Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still think it's a little crazy that this movie is considered a bomb when it made $668 million on a $250 million budget.
I'm not a huge fan of the movie, but it still made a lot of money.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought it was you but maybe someone else who said when it was released that problem with going form Clark to Superman was he did not earn the cape. He just gets in the ship and BAM, he's got a costume and cape.

I thought that was a good take.

Also, someone DL the movie and increased the brightness/contracts and put parts of it on YouTube and it looks 10x better.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At the time, though, Warner Bros. had been killing it with the finales of the Harry Potter franchise and The Dark Knight trilogy each of the two years prior. And WB was expecting their streak to continue, with at least $800M for MoS, if not a billion, for what was considered the granddaddy of all superheroes. It may have been unfair to hold it to the standards of HP and TDK, but that's how the "failure" narrative came to be.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Superman has long been my favorite comic book character. Dating all the way back to Saturday morning cartoons in the early to mid '70s and a plastic Slurpee cup that I snagged on a trip to the local 7-11 with my grandmother when I was probably 4 years old. When that first movie came out in December '78, it was a gold standard in comic book movies. Of course, in those days comic book movies just really didn't exist, at least not on such a grand stage as a major Christmas-time cinematic release.

Superman: The Movie still stands up very well for me 42 years later. For years, I thought Superman II was an awesome movie ... but when I re-watched it not too long ago, it has become about as close to hot garbage as can be, well, excepting entries such as Superman III and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, that last which is legitimately one of the worst 5 movies ever made.

In 2006, I remember being so very pleasantly surprised to hear John Williams' Superman theme during the credits of Superman Returns. The movie was so-so, way better than the previous 2 entries and even better than Superman II.

In 2012, when I saw the first still image from the upcoming Man of Steel, it featured Superman standing in front of a crushed bank vault door. I knew next to nothing about the plot of the movie, but I did learn early on that John Williams was not doing the score (not that he had done a Superman score since 1978). The Superman theme that I had grown up with had been woven into all of those original movies plus Superman Returns. That theme went with Superman just as the Indiana Jones defines that Harrison Ford charcter, the Imperial March is closely associated with Darth Vader ... I could not really get enthused about a Superman movie without some form of John Williams' music.

So when MoS came out in June 2013 ... I was pumped to see it but didn't expect to truly love the movie like I do the original movie from '78. Then, the depiction of Krypton, Russell Crowe's take on Jor-El, and everything related to Krypton was just so different from the sterile look of these things depicted in the original movies, and I loved it. Absolute perfection. The movie did a good thing from there, in that it didn't follow a linear timeline in telling the story of Clark Kent and Superman. We first see him as a rookie on a shrimp boat that gets called in to an oil rig disaster; later we see young Clark Kent, so it was kind of all over the place, and that worked for me. (In an aside, audiences don't ever need to see another depiction of young Kal-El's arrival on Earth and being adopted by the Kent's, growing up in Kansas, all of that, much like we never need to see another mugging in an alley resulting in the deaths of Bruce Wayne's parents).

I loved the depiction of Krytonic technology in this movie. I thought General Zod and his cohorts were far better realized than in Superman II. I generally liked Kevin Costner and Diane Lane as Pa and Ma Kent; Pa's death was poorly handled as opposed to the original movie, and it really didn't resonate on any emotional level as it should have. Amy Adams as Lois Lane didn't move the needle for me, but she is a better looking woman than was Margot Kidder.

And since I commented so much about a concern over the lack of John Williams' theme in the score by Hans Zimmer? Yeah, I never missed the JW theme. Zimmer's work is not hummable for this movie, but it works well. Zimmer did some of his best work with both MoS and Batman Versus Superman.

While I do enjoy BvS quite a bit, that movie should never have been made at the time that it was made. To me, that movie's existence is purely a result of Marvel's unprecedented success with a slate of lesser-known characters. DC showed a remarkable lack of patience in developing their own series. There should have been solo films from each of their primary characters before considering anything like either BvS or Justice League. Granted, doing so takes time, and they were well behind on the scoreboard, but there was not a game clock winding down in the 4th quarter.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

I thought it was you but maybe someone else who said when it was released that problem with going form Clark to Superman was he did not earn the cape. He just gets in the ship and BAM, he's got a costume and cape.

I thought that was a good take.

Also, someone DL the movie and increased the brightness/contracts and put parts of it on YouTube and it looks 10x better.

Yeah, that was one of my biggest issues. I just remember seeing this awesome shot in the trailers of Superman emerging from the ship, thinking what a cool moment that's going to be on screen...



... but then upon seeing the movie itself, thinking how utterly unearned that moment felt in execution. The Jor-El hologram is basically like "Here's your suit" five minutes after meeting Clark, and then two seconds after that... SUPERMAN. I don't have a quick fix for how they should have handled it in-story as-is, but in a completely different iteration, yeah, I would have made a whole thing of Clark either having to "earn" the suit somehow, or treat it like the original movie, where he's basically in hibernation in the Fortress of Solitude for a few years, learning, growing, etc, and then finally emerges as Superman. I think the latter is less dramatic, and they definitely needed to do something new this go around, but anything would have been better than what we got.

What sucks is that the sequence leading up to that moment/reveal is so good, with Jor-El giving the history of Krypton and all that. And even the way he reveals the suit to Clark at the end of that spiel is awesome. But there should have been another other beat or sequence or something between the end of that sequence and the above shot. Just some kind of earn-it challenge or test or lesson or something; like a mini Yoda-with-Luke-on-Degobah kind of thing, at the very least.
Max Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a much better movie than it's given credit for, I've always enjoyed it. Cavill was basically perfect casting for Superman, to me anyway. The trailer was great, I remember how psyched I was after seeing it the first time. It's good, about 80% of the way to being great. In someone else's hands it could have been better. Pa Kent's death was terrible.

Amy Adams was the only real bad casting I can think of. She and Cavill had no chemistry together, nothing at all. She's a terrific actress but this wasn't the right role for her. Shannon and Crowe were great.

I hope we get another Superman film with Cavill. I think the reason the films might not do as well financially as many others is Superman is a really difficult character to make as compelling as someone like Batman.
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


like a mini Yoda-with-Luke-on-Degobah kind of thing, at the very least.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was one letter off!

Also, I'm changing my name to "Louis Degobah" just to irk you.
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well... I guess... at least you used paragraphs in that wall of text, so that is something.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasTeleAg said:

Well... I guess... at least you used paragraphs in that wall of text, so that is something.
I had a lot to say about Superman movies ...
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was a good post!
bearamedic99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why does no one ever mention the intact but empty hibernation pod on the Kryptonian ship? It was such a tease that no one mentions.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearamedic99 said:

Why does no one ever mention the intact but empty hibernation pod on the Kryptonian ship? It was such a tease that no one mentions.
We discussed it alot in the original thread.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.