Entertainment
Sponsored by

Question re: 'A Few Good Men'

1,855 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by SgtBarbarossa
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Watched "A Few Good Men" again yesterday ... great movie.

I always have the same question, however. Not sure if anyone here knows the answer, but here goes:

Everyone is always cautioning Lt. Kaffee to be careful in his questioning of Lt. Kendrick and Col. Jessup, because if he goes too far, he could get severely disciplined.

And yet in their answers to Kaffee, both Kendrick and Jessup are disrespectful. Jessup even calls him a snotty little ******* from the stand.

Is that how military court works?

Kaffee is also an officer, and he is responsible for defending two Marines. Theoretically, they all work for the government of the U.S. Shouldn't Kaffee have the ability to be aggressive without fear of reprisal? And shouldn't those on the stand respect his rank?

Is military court that one-sided, or was that angle just played up for the movie?
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i'm not sure you can handle the truth.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One irony I find about the movie is that the defense is wholesale pushing for the Nuremberg Argument. Makes for a good movie, but when the aftermath of WWII settled the argument it does seem to deflate the movie a bit.
Chipotlemonger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think what they were implying by this is that after the trial is over, if he goes too hard at Jessup, then Jessup has a lot of power and friends up top and he would make Jack's career and life suck going forward.
Post removed:
by user
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not a documentary...
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kaffee was specifically cautioned against making accusations of misconduct without evidence. I thought the script was pretty clear about that.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

i'm not sure you can handle the truth.


EOT
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Kaffee was specifically cautioned against making accusations of misconduct without evidence. I thought the script was pretty clear about that.
It was. Crystal.

But civilian lawyers aren't hampered by that same guideline. So my question stands: Is that a factual representation of military trials -- that military lawyers have to be super careful not to impugn an officer?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah, thanks. I thought you were suggesting the existence of a double standard.
REMARCH11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EclipseAg said:

G Martin 87 said:

Kaffee was specifically cautioned against making accusations of misconduct without evidence. I thought the script was pretty clear about that.
It was. Crystal.

But civilian lawyers aren't hampered by that same guideline. So my question stands: Is that a factual representation of military trials -- that military lawyers have to be super careful not to impugn an officer?
Absolutely not. I'm AD and friends with several JAGs. Trust me, they would have torn COL Jessup apart on the stand.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm more confused by the speed at which the arrest turned into a trial. Seemed like there was almost no passage of time. The defense was clearly rushed.
The Milkman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's simply a matter of rank as well. Kaffee is only a lieutenant
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
REMARCH11 said:

EclipseAg said:

G Martin 87 said:

Kaffee was specifically cautioned against making accusations of misconduct without evidence. I thought the script was pretty clear about that.
It was. Crystal.

But civilian lawyers aren't hampered by that same guideline. So my question stands: Is that a factual representation of military trials -- that military lawyers have to be super careful not to impugn an officer?
Absolutely not. I'm AD and friends with several JAGs. Trust me, they would have torn COL Jessup apart on the stand.
Thanks ... that was the answer I was looking for.
AgLaw02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Military defense counsel operate under their own chain of command to ensure their independence.
SgtBarbarossa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.