Ok. Ok. I'm feeling this a little.Quote:
The series is centered around Detectives Liz Danvers and Evangeline Navarro who are looking to solve the case of six men that operate the Tsalal Arctic Research Station vanishing without a trace, when the long winter night falls in Ennis, Alaska. The pair will have to confront the darkness they carry in themselves and dig into the haunted truths that lie buried under the eternal ice.
No, I had Kristen Bell in a ****ed up version of Veronica Mars / True Detective mash up.20ag07 said:
Who had Jodie Foster on their True Detective S4 bingo card?!?!
The last one was miles better than the Season 2 disaster.Southlake said:
Has to be better than the last one.
Quote:
The pair will have to confront the darkness they carry in themselves and dig into the haunted truths that lie buried under the eternal ice.
I know people like to sh** all over it, and it is certainly not without blemish, but I still maintain that Season 2 was better than the vast majority of shows on TV....just nowhere near the original, which was damn near perfection in all aspects. I found Season 2 entertaining. Although I absolutely HATED the ending. Really wanted his boy to hear that message...what a depressing gut punch.Sooper Jeenyus said:The last one was miles better than the Season 2 disaster.Southlake said:
Has to be better than the last one.
Yeah, and Vince Vaughn. That season was hot garbage. Season 3 had Mahershala Ali and was a bit better than season 2, but still nowhere near season 1.MSFC Aggie said:
I can't even remember season 3. Season 2 had Colin Farrell, right?
Proposition Joe said:Quote:
The pair will have to confront the darkness they carry in themselves and dig into the haunted truths that lie buried under the eternal ice.
Sorry, I can't read this without laughing.
And I think Pizzolatto is rather overrated at this point. His plots are basic and for the most part plodding. He just surrounds himself with incredible actors and allows them to do their thing.
True Detective Season 1 was a tour de force in acting surrounded by a paper thin story. Woody and MM were just so good that you didn't notice/care about the plot holes.
Season 2's solid acting couldn't save the story.
Season 3 was similar to Season 1 in that it had a great leading character but a story that just fell flat.
I would watch the F out of this!Quote:
No, I had Kristen Bell in a ****ed up version of Veronica Mars / True Detective mash up.
Absolutely.Boo Weekley said:I know people like to sh** all over it, and it is certainly not without blemish, but I still maintain that Season 2 was better than the vast majority of shows on TV....just nowhere near the original, which was damn near perfection in all aspects. I found Season 2 entertaining. Although I absolutely HATED the ending. Really wanted his boy to hear that message...what a depressing gut punch.Sooper Jeenyus said:The last one was miles better than the Season 2 disaster.Southlake said:
Has to be better than the last one.
MSFC Aggie said:
I can't even remember season 3. Season 2 had Colin Farrell, right?
Not to mention a brilliant ****ing season leading up to that moment. Season 2 must be the biggest drop off in television history (next thread topic? ). Vince Vaughn was a tragic miscast in that role. So bad…TCTTS said:
I hear you, but that Carcosa set was incredible, and I loved how they incorporated Rust's hallucinations. Yes, how it played out was relatively familiar, but all the extra little flourishes really made up for it, I thought.
Yup. There's only 1 real True Detective.Sooper Jeenyus said:The last one was miles better than the Season 2 disaster.Southlake said:
Has to be better than the last one.
Sooper Jeenyus said:Not to mention a brilliant ****ing season leading up to that moment. Season 2 must be the biggest drop off in television history (next thread topic? ). Vince Vaughn was a tragic miscast in that role. So bad…TCTTS said:
I hear you, but that Carcosa set was incredible, and I loved how they incorporated Rust's hallucinations. Yes, how it played out was relatively familiar, but all the extra little flourishes really made up for it, I thought.
utah, get me two said:
Season 1 set the bar too high, Mcconaughey and Harrelson wet so natural and charasmatic in their roles that I don't even see them I see Rust and Hart. The setting of Louisiana (not New Orleans) the plot of the ant Christian cults and the entire atmosphere was beautiful. It's up their IMO as one of the best TV shows of all time
utah, get me two said:
Season 1 set the bar too high, Mcconaughey and Harrelson wet so natural and charasmatic in their roles that I don't even see them I see Rust and Hart. The setting of Louisiana (not New Orleans) the plot of the ant Christian cults and the entire atmosphere was beautiful. It's up their IMO as one of the best TV shows of all time
As a Season 2 apologist, I couldn't agree with this more. Could probably think of a long list of actors who would be better suited for it. David Harbour comes to mind. I also couldn't stand his wife (ginger chick from Yellowstone) and how she over-acted in it.Sooper Jeenyus said:Not to mention a brilliant ****ing season leading up to that moment. Season 2 must be the biggest drop off in television history (next thread topic? ). Vince Vaughn was a tragic miscast in that role. So bad…TCTTS said:
I hear you, but that Carcosa set was incredible, and I loved how they incorporated Rust's hallucinations. Yes, how it played out was relatively familiar, but all the extra little flourishes really made up for it, I thought.
Season 1 is incredible. Cinematography, acting, storyline, all of it. I want to revisit it soon, for a third viewing.YouBet said:
Never seen this show but plot description on this one is all kinds of intriguing.
Completely separate.aTmAg said:
Are the seasons separate? Or do they go together?