Entertainment
Sponsored by

so uh....let's talk about die hard 3?

3,665 Views | 35 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by EMY92
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
came across this little tidbit in a youtube video and not sure how well known this is and thought it was crazy enough to share....

apparently the federal reserve heist in die hard 3 was so well planned and thought out the FBI got involved and question the screenwriter Jonathan Hensleigh

this was always my second favorite die hard next to the original and this makes it even better with finding this out!

here's an old article about it and i'll post a few highlights from it here....

https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2487019/the-bank-heist-in-die-hard-with-a-vengeance-was-so-well-planned-the-fbi-got-involved

Quote:

Here's how Hensleigh described his encounter with the FBI. Naturally, since he's the storyteller here, it's probably better to leave it in his own words.

"One day I got a call from the FBI. They were extremely concerned about how I knew so much about the Federal Reserve, and how the Federal Reserve's vaults were really close to a subway spur, and logistically about the aqueduct tunnel, etc ...

I said, 'Well guys, the reason why I know what the vault looks like in the Federal Reserve is because they let us down there. They showed it to us.

The reason why I know that a subway spur is very close to the vault and that you could actually tunnel through it is because they showed us the plans and the layout.

And the reason why I know there is an aqueduct tunnel coming down through Manhattan that you can drives these trucks through is because I read about it in the New York Times Sunday Magazine.

So I'm really not employed by Afghani terrorists. I really don't have any kind of secret proprietary knowledge that I shouldn't have."


Quote:

As he revealed, Jonathan Hensleigh was interrogated by the FBI and at one point, he was genuinely concerned that he was going to be arrested. Ultimately, though, it seems like the FBI was just trying to figure out how the hell he made it seem so plausible, which Hensleigh ultimately took as a compliment.

Hensleigh also noted that the FBI guy admitted that he planned to have a meeting to discuss the ways in which the facility could be improved, suggesting that they knew they need to get their guard up if folks like Hensleigh could devise semi-plausible ways for this heist to happen.
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He said Hey Zeus not Jesus
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not sure about if he was ever questioned by anyone, but I do remember that despite extensively writing about the military Clancy never actually served in the military.


Order of best Die Hard's: 1 > 3 > 2 > Whatever else they've come out with since
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Couldn't agree more with that order. First three are all fun, well made movies.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579 said:

Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
This is how I recall it and I could be wrong but I don't think so. The late 80's was a while ago.

Clancy was very, very, well researched and obviously a big brain, And as his acclaim grew he did get access to more sources that gave him some additional information (not necessarily anything classified just some insights).

The FBI spoke with him on a couple of occasions, not necessarily because they were accusing of him of anything, moreso because the intelligence agencies and DOD were interested in how he was coming to some of the conclusions he was in his storytelling (mainly along the lines of correctly projecting the capabilities of both the US and our adversaries).
Mega Lops
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As I was going to St. Ives,
I met a man with seven wives,
Each wife had seven sacks,
Each sack had seven cats,
Each cat had seven kits:
Kits, cats, sacks, and wives,
How many were there going to St. Ives?

MGS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David Happymountain said:

As I was going to St. Ives,
I met a man with seven wives,
Each wife had seven sacks,
Each sack had seven cats,
Each cat had seven kits:
Kits, cats, sacks, and wives,
How many were there going to St. Ives?


How do you dial 1?
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is such a great video that does show how ultimately Fishburne's people not only screwed him out of Pulp Fiction but also out of Die Hard 3. Tarantino does a fantastic job of breaking it down and what's great is Lawrence's guys did the "right thing" in terms of their strategy but talk about your all-time backfires.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Urban Ag said:

bluefire579 said:

Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
This is how I recall it and I could be wrong but I don't think so. The late 80's was a while ago.

Clancy was very, very, well researched and obviously a big brain, And as his acclaim grew he did get access to more sources that gave him some additional information (not necessarily anything classified just some insights).

The FBI spoke with him on a couple of occasions, not necessarily because they were accusing of him of anything, moreso because the intelligence agencies and DOD were interested in how he was coming to some of the conclusions he was in his storytelling (mainly along the lines of correctly projecting the capabilities of both the US and our adversaries).


In the epilogue/afterword of The Sum Of All Fears, Clancy mentions that his knowledge of how to build a nuclear bomb shown in the books comes completely from what he learned at the NYPL. Not sure if the FBI questioned him or not, but if you had heard that, I would guess it would either be about that or from how he basically tells you how to build a nuclear sub in THFTRO.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IIRC it was from a Newsweek interview.

Also, apparently Clear and Present Danger was just too close to home in regards to some of our operations in Columbia at the time as well, targeting FARC but concealing that behind the war on the cartels.

Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, the fed agencies have a long history of interviewing writers and film makers who hit on topics of relevance to national security. It's smart policy to pick brains. In the years following the 9/11 attack, the FBI and NSA quietly met with numerous Hollywood writers and authors in regards to fictional ideas they had for terrorist attacks (that would play out in books or film).
PDEMDHC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Die hard 3 proves you can fall 300 feet onto the deck of a ship without a single injury.
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Urban Ag said:

Also, the fed agencies have a long history of interviewing writers and film makers who hit on topics of relevance to national security. It's smart policy to pick brains. In the years following the 9/11 attack, the FBI and NSA quietly met with numerous Hollywood writers and authors in regards to fictional ideas they had for terrorist attacks (that would play out in books or film).
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Am I bad a human being for liking DH2 more than 3? I actually really liked it.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Orlando Ayala Cant Read said:

Am I bad a human being for liking DH2 more than 3? I actually really liked it.


I liked 2 a lot too. But maybe I'm just that kind of movie's ***hole.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2 is good except for the proximity of the church to an airport. John Amos is great, and that movie probably made Dennis Franz's career.

3 is fun because it's New YOrk, and Sam Jackson was fresh off Pulp Fiction and rising, and Willis still gave a ***** And there was that blonde chick that you weren't sure if she was going to bang you or snap your neck.
The Dirty Sock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeremy irons is a solid villain. He was excellent in margin call
Scriffer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Definitely Not A Cop said:

Urban Ag said:

bluefire579 said:

Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
This is how I recall it and I could be wrong but I don't think so. The late 80's was a while ago.

Clancy was very, very, well researched and obviously a big brain, And as his acclaim grew he did get access to more sources that gave him some additional information (not necessarily anything classified just some insights).

The FBI spoke with him on a couple of occasions, not necessarily because they were accusing of him of anything, moreso because the intelligence agencies and DOD were interested in how he was coming to some of the conclusions he was in his storytelling (mainly along the lines of correctly projecting the capabilities of both the US and our adversaries).


In the epilogue/afterword of The Sum Of All Fears, Clancy mentions that his knowledge of how to build a nuclear bomb shown in the books comes completely from what he learned at the NYPL. Not sure if the FBI questioned him or not, but if you had heard that, I would guess it would either be about that or from how he basically tells you how to build a nuclear sub in THFTRO.

When i was in school, I got to have dinner with Jim Olson from the Bush School. He was telling lots of crazy stories, and towards the end of the evening, I asked how the CIA felt about Clancy.

He chuckled, looked down, and said "we don't like him very much." He said they had tossed the house several times and always came up empty. Clancy always told them he was just an old insurance man who liked to do research.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Surprised this hasn't been shown yet. I think I like this ending better.
guadalupeag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bluefire579 said:

Urban Ag said:

Also, the fed agencies have a long history of interviewing writers and film makers who hit on topics of relevance to national security. It's smart policy to pick brains. In the years following the 9/11 attack, the FBI and NSA quietly met with numerous Hollywood writers and authors in regards to fictional ideas they had for terrorist attacks (that would play out in books or film).



Say what you want about Mel Gibson, but the son of a ***** knows story structure.
guadalupeag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dp
43rd Street Posse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man you could NOT do this scene today.

bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
43rd Street Posse said:

Man you could NOT do this scene today.


Was surprised they could do that scene in 1995.
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
great, now I have to think about that water jug problem again
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scriffer said:

Definitely Not A Cop said:

Urban Ag said:

bluefire579 said:

Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
This is how I recall it and I could be wrong but I don't think so. The late 80's was a while ago.

Clancy was very, very, well researched and obviously a big brain, And as his acclaim grew he did get access to more sources that gave him some additional information (not necessarily anything classified just some insights).

The FBI spoke with him on a couple of occasions, not necessarily because they were accusing of him of anything, moreso because the intelligence agencies and DOD were interested in how he was coming to some of the conclusions he was in his storytelling (mainly along the lines of correctly projecting the capabilities of both the US and our adversaries).


In the epilogue/afterword of The Sum Of All Fears, Clancy mentions that his knowledge of how to build a nuclear bomb shown in the books comes completely from what he learned at the NYPL. Not sure if the FBI questioned him or not, but if you had heard that, I would guess it would either be about that or from how he basically tells you how to build a nuclear sub in THFTRO.

When i was in school, I got to have dinner with Jim Olson from the Bush School. He was telling lots of crazy stories, and towards the end of the evening, I asked how the CIA felt about Clancy.

He chuckled, looked down, and said "we don't like him very much." He said they had tossed the house several times and always came up empty. Clancy always told them he was just an old insurance man who liked to do research.

Hah, I had that exact same exchange with him when I took his course my senior year.
CajunAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
toucan82 said:

great, now I have to think about that water jug problem again
Lol, I thought the exact thing too!
In my experience, there's no such thing as luck.
Baba Ganoush
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CajunAg97 said:

toucan82 said:

great, now I have to think about that water jug problem again
Lol, I thought the exact thing too!

Fill the 5 gallon jug with water from the fountain then use it to fill up the 3 gallon jug. The 5 gallon jug now contains 2 gallons and the 3 gallon jug contains 3 gallons.

Dump out the 3 gallon jug and then pour the remaining 2 gallons from the 5 gallon jug into the 3 gallon jug. The 5 gallon jug is now empty and the 3 gallon jug now contains 2 gallons.

Fill the 5 gallon jug with water from the fountain one more time then use it to fill up the 3 gallon jug. Since the 3 gallon jug already contained 2 gallons, you can only pour 1 gallon into it. Leaving the 5 gallon jug with 4 gallons.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
toucan82 said:

great, now I have to think about that water jug problem again


It shows up almost verbatim in the star wars video game knights of the old republic in 2003.
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

toucan82 said:

great, now I have to think about that water jug problem again


It shows up almost verbatim in the star wars video game knights of the old republic in 2003.
Just a thought experiment of empty space....
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bluefire579 said:

Didn't Clancy initially have the same kind of conversations with the feds stemming from his early books with stuff he just researched at the library? Feel like I remember reading that somewhere.
When "The Hunt For Red October" hit it big, book and movie, I recall a rumor that the story was actually true and the US had indeed gotten its hands on a Soviet boomer when the crew defected. The rumor also centered on the CIA and DoD being questioning Clancy to find out where he had gotten the information.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.