Entertainment
Sponsored by

Article: ESPN VS. CHARTER COULD BE THE END OF THE CABLE BUNDLE

7,379 Views | 77 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by superunknown
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An excellent writeup of The Rise and Fall of ESPN, including all the different cable phases that most of us have lived through.

MW03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe that Travis is exceptionally smart. And he is business savvy. Personally, I think Travis learned watching Trump's 2016 campaign and incorporated a lot of that messaging into his platform to drive attention, positive or negative.

That's why I mockingly put a "trigger warning" in my OP. Some people can't get past the salesman to see the product.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for this, it's one of the most detailed analyses I've seen on the feud.
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iowaggie said:

An excellent writeup of The Rise and Fall of ESPN, including all the different cable phases that most of us have lived through.


Good stuff.

I've said this before, but Comcast's Xfinity service has done a good job of bundling streaming services with traditional cable in an easy-to-use portal, all accessible by voice control. To me, it's the best of both worlds.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
boy09 said:

aTmAg said:

TRD-Ferguson said:

Makes me laugh when "Fox" anything triggers people. I don't disagree that Fox has its agenda. Let's be honest though. They ALL have an agenda. Yet Fox is the bogeyman. Turn all of it off and you'll feel better.
This applies to EVERYTHING. Including documentaries, scientific studies, non-fiction and fiction, books, etc.

One should try to identify the agenda and keep that in mind when consuming.
Do you enjoy anything?
One does not need to be oblivious to the world in order to enjoy stuff.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pro-tip. Don't start sentences with "One." It doesn't make you sound smart.
.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EclipseAg said:

Iowaggie said:

An excellent writeup of The Rise and Fall of ESPN, including all the different cable phases that most of us have lived through.


Good stuff.

I've said this before, but Comcast's Xfinity service has done a good job of bundling streaming services with traditional cable in an easy-to-use portal, all accessible by voice control. To me, it's the best of both worlds.
The services who pivot to make things as accessible as possible will do well. But the ones who stick to the ancient method of contracts and costly cable-box equipment will go the way of Blockbuster.

I don't regret dropping DISH 5 years ago for streaming cable at all. No box, no contract, no added fees, and better picture quality. I was visiting family last weekend and their cable provider was of course, Spectrum...so no ESPN for the A&M game. No problem! I just pulled up my YouTubeTV app and watched the game on the iPad. Can take it with me wherever I go.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:

Pro-tip. Don't start sentences with "One." It doesn't make you sound smart.
Good thing my content is plenty smart to make up for it.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Says the guy who considers Jon Stewart a valid news source.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Had exactly the same trajectory with his content. And to each their own, but it's painfully obvious he saw the money in faux outrage media and ran with it.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Xfinity/Comcast dropped Fox today.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iowaggie said:

Xfinity/Comcast dropped Fox today.

This a local thing? I'm in Houston with Xfinity, have the Nebraska Colorado game on now
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

Iowaggie said:

Xfinity/Comcast dropped Fox today.

This a local thing? I'm in Houston with Xfinity, have the Nebraska Colorado game on now


Unsure, but it does seem to be a regional thing. I'm checking X and you can tell the fan bases that are missing out. However, it appears that some fans found the Spanish announcer version.





There's also this:
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't forget that a lot of this stuff can be received over the air for free. Watched the Aggies today, unfortunately, with rabbit ears.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrong thread
BIMS O1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they didn't play 90 seconds of commercials for every minute of game coverage, the games would only last 3 hours.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
htxag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nm
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
htxag09 said:

Just another point in this. Why the hell does espn still act like normal games are 3 hours as far as the guide and scheduling? I mean per the guide this Texas Alabama game is already over. Still 10 minutes left in the 4th


Because the tracking and billing software has a really difficult time handling programming that crosses over a calendar day.
Madmarttigan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Commercials are longer and worse than they've ever been, it's insane
TXAG 05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BIMS O1 said:

If they didn't play 90 seconds of commercials for every minute of game coverage, the games would only last 3 hours.


But then ESPN wouldn't be paying us $50M+ a year.
BIMS O1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There has to be a way to do advertising without completely disrupting the flow of game coverage. Look at how golf has started doing a side "picture in picture" as an example. They are forcing so many ads in that the product less watchable.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AggieOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madmarttigan said:

Commercials are longer and worse than they've ever been, it's insane


I'm just tired of the commercials being insanely loud.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BIMS O1 said:

There has to be a way to do advertising without completely disrupting the flow of game coverage. Look at how golf has started doing a side "picture in picture" as an example. They are forcing so many ads in that the product less watchable.


There absolutely is. PIP ads, sponsored uniforms, etc.

I still think it won't matter. ESPN's issue isn't that they don't know how to advertise effectively, it's that they have paid out so much money for control that it's getting harder to make it back up once the product hits the field. Their answer the past 10 years has been to simply take hits with the customer experience, which is only aggravating the issue with people not wanting to sit through the length they require to show all their sponsors. It's a cascading failure that is picking up speed unless something drastic is done.

I think the main thing is to cut any fluff out of the broadcasting side. I would also try to incorporate betting into watching ESPN.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just to make this further Entertainment related, I can't help but think about The Morning Show (Season 3 starts Wednesday!) when this topic comes up. Billy Crudup pulls off his vision to start a streaming platform for the network only to have it flounder. It was more of a secondary story line on that show near the end of last season, but I'm interested to see how they play that out this season in light of real-world disruption happening right now.

Separately, we just switched from YTTV to Hulu Live a couple of weeks ago and the interface for Hulu Live when you have the ESPN+ addition is a chaotic nightmare. It took me several minutes to even find our game yesterday by manually scrolling forever to find it. Search wouldn't pull it up, my recording of it wouldn't play, and if selected from the live tv guide (which you can't get to from the interface!?) was showing the Notre Dame game.

I really do miss DTV. A simpler, but still tech forward time with superior picture quality over streaming. It's just too expensive. Something has to give in all of this and it will. And that might be me buying digital rabbit ears and cancelling live tv services over streaming. Literally, the only thing I watch live are sporting events and election nights.
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Just to make this further Entertainment related, I can't help but think about The Morning Show (Season 3 starts Wednesday!) when this topic comes up. Billy Crudup pulls off his vision to start a streaming platform for the network only to have it flounder. It was more of a secondary story line on that show near the end of last season, but I'm interested to see how they play that out this season in light of real-world disruption happening right now.

Separately, we just switched from YTTV to Hulu Live a couple of weeks ago and the interface for Hulu Live when you have the ESPN+ addition is a chaotic nightmare. It took me several minutes to even find our game yesterday by manually scrolling forever to find it. Search wouldn't pull it up, my recording of it wouldn't play, and if selected from the live tv guide (which you can't get to from the interface!?) was showing the Notre Dame game.

I really do miss DTV. A simpler, but still tech forward time with superior picture quality over streaming. It's just too expensive. Something has to give in all of this and it will. And that might be me buying digital rabbit ears and cancelling live tv services over streaming. Literally, the only thing I watch live are sporting events and election nights.
that's because the game was moved at the last minute due to ND getting delayed on ABC.

It was a similar nightmare on xifinity as somehow the guys ESPN package didn't include ESPN News. Just silly
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Just to make this further Entertainment related, I can't help but think about The Morning Show (Season 3 starts Wednesday!) when this topic comes up. Billy Crudup pulls off his vision to start a streaming platform for the network only to have it flounder. It was more of a secondary story line on that show near the end of last season, but I'm interested to see how they play that out this season in light of real-world disruption happening right now.

Separately, we just switched from YTTV to Hulu Live a couple of weeks ago and the interface for Hulu Live when you have the ESPN+ addition is a chaotic nightmare. It took me several minutes to even find our game yesterday by manually scrolling forever to find it. Search wouldn't pull it up, my recording of it wouldn't play, and if selected from the live tv guide (which you can't get to from the interface!?) was showing the Notre Dame game.

I really do miss DTV. A simpler, but still tech forward time with superior picture quality over streaming. It's just too expensive. Something has to give in all of this and it will. And that might be me buying digital rabbit ears and cancelling live tv services over streaming. Literally, the only thing I watch live are sporting events and election nights.


Man.

You like being miserable, don't you.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
maroon barchetta said:

YouBet said:

Just to make this further Entertainment related, I can't help but think about The Morning Show (Season 3 starts Wednesday!) when this topic comes up. Billy Crudup pulls off his vision to start a streaming platform for the network only to have it flounder. It was more of a secondary story line on that show near the end of last season, but I'm interested to see how they play that out this season in light of real-world disruption happening right now.

Separately, we just switched from YTTV to Hulu Live a couple of weeks ago and the interface for Hulu Live when you have the ESPN+ addition is a chaotic nightmare. It took me several minutes to even find our game yesterday by manually scrolling forever to find it. Search wouldn't pull it up, my recording of it wouldn't play, and if selected from the live tv guide (which you can't get to from the interface!?) was showing the Notre Dame game.

I really do miss DTV. A simpler, but still tech forward time with superior picture quality over streaming. It's just too expensive. Something has to give in all of this and it will. And that might be me buying digital rabbit ears and cancelling live tv services over streaming. Literally, the only thing I watch live are sporting events and election nights.


Man.

You like being miserable, don't you.


Yes, I must be a sadist.
FtWorthHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MW03 said:

When (not "if" according to Travis) ESPN loses this battle, it will be 10x as expensive to watch sports,

Isn't the more likely outcome that the amounts the leagues get paid fall dramatically?
DallasAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Youtube TV (which I have) is just cable over broadband, but since they have lower overhead from traditional cable companies (ie they don't own or have to worry about cable lines, installs or satellites) they can be more competitive when negotiating with content providers.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Milwaukees Best Light said:

If I could get the Astros and Rockets without buying 75 other channels too, it would be great.
WTF MLB.TV insists on their ridiculous black out rules is beyond me. The best part is there is only a single cable subscriber that has Bally sports to watch the Royals. If you don't have spectrum TV, you can't watch.

Just get MLB.TV and a VPN. I did this a few years ago when the Royals were still good and it worked great.
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

Milwaukees Best Light said:

If I could get the Astros and Rockets without buying 75 other channels too, it would be great.
WTF MLB.TV insists on their ridiculous black out rules is beyond me. The best part is there is only a single cable subscriber that has Bally sports to watch the Royals. If you don't have spectrum TV, you can't watch.

Just get MLB.TV and a VPN. I did this a few years ago when the Royals were still good and it worked great.
The blackout rules are there because the regional sports networks pay A LOT of money to the teams for exclusivity.
Frok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FtWorthHorn said:

MW03 said:

When (not "if" according to Travis) ESPN loses this battle, it will be 10x as expensive to watch sports,

Isn't the more likely outcome that the amounts the leagues get paid fall dramatically?


It depends, is the demand for sports consumption still there? If so some service will pick it up with some sort of new bundling model.

However I do wonder if there is as much interest in younger folks with sports. My kids don't really watch much sports at all. At their age I was already hooked.

Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frok said:

FtWorthHorn said:

MW03 said:

When (not "if" according to Travis) ESPN loses this battle, it will be 10x as expensive to watch sports,

Isn't the more likely outcome that the amounts the leagues get paid fall dramatically?


It depends, is the demand for sports consumption still there? If so some service will pick it up with some sort of new bundling model.

However I do wonder if there is as much interest in younger folks with sports. My kids don't really watch much sports at all. At their age I was already hooked.




Were the games taking 4.5 hours when you were that age?
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.