I started crying in front of my kids when we watched the Disney version and they nailed the Father Christmas scene so well with Lord Commander Mormont from GoT.Madmarttigan said:
Disney version one of my favorite movies and a fantastic score as well.
Watched that while visiting a friend in Dallas the night it came out. Was like the whole world changed.AustinAg2K said:
How has this thread gotten to a second page without the "Chronic What Clea of Narnia"?
It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?ChipFTAC01 said:
When I was scrolling down and saw Meryl Streep I thought, "Holy cow! Meryl Streep as the witch?! That's swinging for the fences."
But Aslan? Come on!
Dr. Mephisto said:maroon barchetta said:
It's Netflix. It's 2024. Of course they will make changes because reasons.
Lucy will be black and gay, Edmund will be trans, Susan will be an activist, and Peter will be a beta soy spouting about enviromentalism.
Mr. Tumnus will be called a "pan-sexual ally" (see what I did there?) and the villainous White Witch will be . . . well, it's right there in the name, isn't it?
meh. It's a not a very funny satire.Faustus said:Dr. Mephisto said:maroon barchetta said:
It's Netflix. It's 2024. Of course they will make changes because reasons.
Lucy will be black and gay, Edmund will be trans, Susan will be an activist, and Peter will be a beta soy spouting about enviromentalism.
Mr. Tumnus will be called a "pan-sexual ally" (see what I did there?) and the villainous White Witch will be . . . well, it's right there in the name, isn't it?
That's pretty funny.
Going to be a bit tough to shave off the mane if he isn't.Faustus said:
It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?
lFaustus said:It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?ChipFTAC01 said:
When I was scrolling down and saw Meryl Streep I thought, "Holy cow! Meryl Streep as the witch?! That's swinging for the fences."
But Aslan? Come on!
This was probably the most obvious tweak Greta was going to make to the dogma.
Faustus said:It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?ChipFTAC01 said:
When I was scrolling down and saw Meryl Streep I thought, "Holy cow! Meryl Streep as the witch?! That's swinging for the fences."
But Aslan? Come on!
This was probably the most obvious tweak Greta was going to make to the dogma.
Quote:
It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?
Quote:
Quad Dog said:meh. It's a not a very funny satire.Faustus said:Dr. Mephisto said:maroon barchetta said:
It's Netflix. It's 2024. Of course they will make changes because reasons.
Lucy will be black and gay, Edmund will be trans, Susan will be an activist, and Peter will be a beta soy spouting about enviromentalism.
Mr. Tumnus will be called a "pan-sexual ally" (see what I did there?) and the villainous White Witch will be . . . well, it's right there in the name, isn't it?
That's pretty funny.
agdoc2001 said:Going to be a bit tough to shave off the mane if he isn't.Faustus said:
It's ok to have a Jesus allegory embodied as an animal, but that animal had better be male?
Faustus said:Quad Dog said:meh. It's a not a very funny satire.Faustus said:Dr. Mephisto said:maroon barchetta said:
It's Netflix. It's 2024. Of course they will make changes because reasons.
Lucy will be black and gay, Edmund will be trans, Susan will be an activist, and Peter will be a beta soy spouting about enviromentalism.
Mr. Tumnus will be called a "pan-sexual ally" (see what I did there?) and the villainous White Witch will be . . . well, it's right there in the name, isn't it?
That's pretty funny.
The Pan double entendre was a fun twist as a way of expressing his disdain. Just tipping my hat to the clever play on words.
