It Ends With Us Lawsuit

8,885 Views | 65 Replies | Last: 42 min ago by Faustus
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://apple.news/Ahjrw3rEoSL6I1ybd8hrNhQ

Quote:

. . . This lawsuit is a legal action based on an overwhelming amount of untampered evidence detailing Blake Lively and her team's duplicitous attempt to destroy Justin Baldoni, his team and their respective companies by disseminating grossly edited, unsubstantiated, new and doctored information to the media," Freedman said in a statement on Thursday.


Overwhelming, untampered, duplicitous, destroy, grossly edited, unsubstantiated, doctored, yada yada.

It's never a great sign when your attorney is doing triage with the press. I imagine Freedman is wishing he had Lively/Reynolds/retainers' phones' contents too, because it can't be much fun going to war with his clients' texts to the hired help sensationally providing headlines in the ruh roh suit.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Baldoni's side seems unhinged. Either his attorney is taking him for a ride or Baldoni is dumber then he looks and is directing his attorney throw every stupid allegation he can think of into a lawsuit so the press will cover it.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Either his attorney is taking him for a ride or Baldoni is dumber then he looks
Did the dude look anything other than dumb to you in the first place?


oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we are at the point where he realizes his career is completely torched, and is just hoping for hail Mary 1 or 2 percent settlement so he isn't financially insecure the rest of this life. He figures at some point it will be in Reynolds interest to settle. Reynolds might prefer scorched earth though. Gonna be fun to watch.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faustus said:

https://apple.news/Ahjrw3rEoSL6I1ybd8hrNhQ

Quote:

. . . This lawsuit is a legal action based on an overwhelming amount of untampered evidence detailing Blake Lively and her team's duplicitous attempt to destroy Justin Baldoni, his team and their respective companies by disseminating grossly edited, unsubstantiated, new and doctored information to the media," Freedman said in a statement on Thursday.


Overwhelming, untampered, duplicitous, destroy, grossly edited, unsubstantiated, doctored, yada yada.

It's never a great sign when your attorney is doing triage with the press. I imagine Freedman is wishing he had Lively/Reynolds/retainers' phones' contents too, because it can't be much fun going to war with his clients' texts to the hired help sensationally providing headlines in the ruh roh suit.
I'm picturing Jackie Chiles sitting at a desk somewhere trying to see how many long words he can use to issue a statement with no actual substance.

ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bangobango said:

Baldoni's side seems unhinged. Either his attorney is taking him for a ride or Baldoni is dumber then he looks and is directing his attorney throw every stupid allegation he can think of into a lawsuit so the press will cover it.


Yeah... It doesn't really matter if Nicepool is Baldoni or not. You can lampoon or satirize people all you want. It's free expression. What you can't do is hire a PR firm to spread rumors and false allegations to undermine someone because you may or may not have committed sexual harassment. That's getting into libel/defamation territory, and if those texts really exist about wanting to bury her, you're flirting with actual malice too.

If it comes down to, "She was being a ***** and taking over/He was sexually harassing women and being wildly inappropriate in the workplace," only one of those is really going to come with receipts, and it's the same one you can't legally do.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has to be the most ridiculous fking thing anyone has ever seen

Like- I don't know what he's trying to prove, other than she's a ***** and he hates her (which is the same thing she seems to be trying to prove).

She's directing this as much as he is. (Which seems to be the problem- he was not ever a legit director. Now- that's on her for working with him in the first place.)

For all the money that is being spent on PR here, lololol, no. PR is supposed to make you look good. Not just "slightly less worse".
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G.I.Bro said:

I kinda wonder what the thought process was. I mean you're messing with the wife of one of the biggest faces in Hollywood, I'm sure RR has enough pull to sink this guys career without a lawsuit. Did he think RR was so silly and fun that he wouldn't mind other men asking his wife about their orgasms?

this is like the Iran versus Iraq war where both sides suck and you just hope for mutually assured destruction.

there is no "good side" in this one. both are @#$#@$$@#
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

What's shocking is that neither side mentioned a thing about this while the movie was exploding at the box office last summer. It's almost like they were OK with the terrible behavior that had taken place because they didn't want to miss out on the movie making hundreds of millions of dollars. I hate to sound jaded, but it almost feels like these famous people are able to put aside personal grievances when there's a giant stack of cash being poured down their maws at the box office and then "remember" later that they hate each other.
Welcome to Hollywood for the last 80 years!
citizenkane06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's more about professionalism. There are a ton of people counting on them, so the work comes first.
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
well, been a minute since we posted about this topic. does that new website pretty much tank Lively's case or just add another layer to this whole onion?
GoAgs92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deadpool and Gossip girl should settle and end this debacle.
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anything juicy on there?

Too many words for me.
RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Blake Lively might be the most disliked person in Hollywood these days. Read an article about her new movie with Anna Kendrick is likely going to tank because people don't want to give BL the business.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No you didn't. At least not a real one.

It's going to Amazon Prime, where it doesn't do "business", and no one knows who watched except Amazon.

User name checks out though.
RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Umm, I have no reason to lie. In fact, I couldn't care less.

[url] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14369653/anna-kendrick-blake-lively-feud-revealed-simple-favor-justin-baldoni.html[/url]

The quotes from the article from people lead one to believe many won't be watching it. That's all my point was.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol. The Daily Mail.

Nothing in that "article" says the movie is going to tank.

It's just stirring up drama about whose name goes first on the title card.

Probably instigated by Justin Baldoni's PR people.

Quote:

The quotes from the article from people lead one to believe many won't be watching it. That's all my point was.
They found one commenter on instagram who said they wouldn't watch.

Know what you're reading…

RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There were more comments than just one, but I don't really care either way.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You don't care so much you made three posts about it before you went to bed last night.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm now commenting on this thread because this topic is what my wife opened with this morning at the kitchen table. I don't really care what happens here but I feel compelled to tell the rest of you that.

This seems to have spiraled out of control. I just hope Lively wasn't banished from Taylor's box at the Super Bowl. That would bring me such despair.

RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What I find interesting is the comments section of websites like the Daily Mail. My 13 yo daughter watched Gossip Girl and by extension I had to watch a few episodes because our living room is right off the kitchen.

There are many articles about this feud on DM and I almost always go directly to the comments section to see what people think about it. What I find fascinating is how some of you appear to view this situation differently, but elsewhere most appear to be siding with her costar on DM. I just find it interesting. I don't know what to make of it. The contention that has emerged is likely more interesting than the actual movie.

Once again, I really don't care a whit about any of these people, nor have I ever watched a movie with BL in it other than a few episodes of GG that my daughter watched when I happened to be in the room. Once again, many of you appear to have a different take than most others if you go by large online periodicals.

Yes, I know, I must care because of my comments on this thread…blah, blah, blah.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightWingConspirator said:

What I find interesting is the comments section of websites like the Daily Mail. My 13 yo daughter watched Gossip Girl and by extension I had to watch a few episodes because our living room is right off the kitchen.

There are many articles about this feud on DM and I almost always go directly to the comments section to see what people think about it. What I find fascinating is how many of you defend BL with a passion reserved for her family, but elsewhere most appear to be siding with her costar on DM. I just find it interesting.

Once again, I really don't care a whit about any of these people, nor have I ever watched a movie with BL in it other than a few episodes of GG that my daughter watched when I happened to be in the room. Once again, many of you appear to have a different take than most others if you go by large online periodicals.

Yes, I know, I must care because of my comments on this thread…blah, blah, blah.



A bunch of jealous emo land manatees do NOT side with Blake Lively but do side with the alleged hunky former co-star?

No WAY!!!!
RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You may be right. Reread my post as I just edited it. Rereading it myself it came across not as I intended it.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Daily Mail (and its comment section) are not where you go to get your news of what's going on.

HTH

Like you, probably anyone commenting there has also never seen any Blake Lively movie ever, didn't see the first A Simple Favor (which was quite good), and certainly were never going to watch the next one on Amazon.

But again- getting your world takes from the Daily Mail's comment section is absolutely hilarious.

For a real take- neither of these people are going to win any kind of lawsuit ever. She filed hers as a PR move (which I'm absolutely not defending). He filed his in a worse PR move. The difference is, she can work again and he's not going to direct or act in anything without significant private investments.

I don't think you understand how stories get fed to places like The Daily Mail- which is exactly the whole gist of this entire story- That PR companies feed stuff to random websites and a bunch of trolls come out.
RightWingConspirator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

But again- getting your world takes from the Daily Mail's comment section is absolutely hilarious.


You have a very arrogant and condescending way about you.

Good day, sir. Let's hope our paths do not cross.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And you can go back to getting your news from the comment section of The Daily Mail.
98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

I'm now commenting on this thread because this topic is what my wife opened with this morning at the kitchen table. I don't really care what happens here but I feel compelled to tell the rest of you that.

This seems to have spiraled out of control. I just hope Lively wasn't banished from Taylor's box at the Super Bowl. That would bring me such despair.




I got roped into this the same way. Seems like Ryan Reynolds rep is taking a hit and things might be swinging Baldonis way according to my wife.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightWingConspirator said:

What I find interesting is the comments section of websites like the Daily Mail. My 13 yo daughter watched Gossip Girl and by extension I had to watch a few episodes because our living room is right off the kitchen.

There are many articles about this feud on DM and I almost always go directly to the comments section to see what people think about it. What I find fascinating is how some of you appear to view this situation differently, but elsewhere most appear to be siding with her costar on DM. I just find it interesting. I don't know what to make of it. The contention that has emerged is likely more interesting than the actual movie.

Once again, I really don't care a whit about any of these people, nor have I ever watched a movie with BL in it other than a few episodes of GG that my daughter watched when I happened to be in the room. Once again, many of you appear to have a different take than most others if you go by large online periodicals.

Yes, I know, I must care because of my comments on this thread…blah, blah, blah.



I'm dubious reading hundreds of comments following a tabloid piece is informative as to any broader audience. Juxtaposing them with the tens of posts on an entertainment forum of a college sports website does sound fascinating though.

This DM piece has 300 comments.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14374375/amp/blake-lively-taylor-swift-super-bowl-snub.html

Granted a number of them are likely from or spawned by the respective camp's online retainers, but you have to think at least some of the comments are by random people with opinions about the celebs at hand.

I'm not sure how the dichotomy with tabloid posters can be explained - taking at face value you have the commentator zeitgeist pigeon holed.

Level of education maybe? Targeted audience? A Google search with Daily Mail and Lively turns up a hilariously relentless parade of hit pieces on her, so maybe that plays into it.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RightWingConspirator said:

Quote:

But again- getting your world takes from the Daily Mail's comment section is absolutely hilarious.


You have a very arrogant and condescending way about you.

Good day, sir. Let's hope our paths do not cross.


This Lively Baldoni feud could not have come at a less fortuitous time. Do not let their discord color our interactions here.

I for one apologize for any remarks which could be construed as less than gentlemanly.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.