I've got to say first of all, too much emphasis is being placed on 2:42. That is only the official time, and not accurate. I know it sounds a certain way, has a "ring" to it, but don't overemphasize it. It's like celebrating Jesus's crucifixtion on Easter Sunday. The date is not exact, only commonly followed.
As for what else I've read, off campus Bonfire has been burned since Moses Hall burned it in '01. A congruence followed later. In addition, I say to hell with "off-campus Bonfire being spelled with a little b," or "It doesn't compare with 'Fightin' Texas yah yah'". Fact is, the current off-campus Bonfire is just as significant in origin, susceptibility to failure, and collective passions as the "real deal".
Last time I accompanied my boys to the collective off-campus Bonfire, I didn't see a single stack. While all logs of the stacks were touching the ground, the potential for outdoing it are there. Is it now as I'm reading only a single-stack, broad-and-wide tepee structure?
Why also must the "greypots" insist on calling themselves "redpots". What use is there in emulating oneself to a position that we all know was ridden with fallibility?
As for the batt article in which Loveless states that this will be one of the last times the families are involved...what someone before said about it being basically a reopened wound I agree with. The severity of losing a part of you can never possibly be less poignant. When others encourage you to caress a missing limb, is it not still gone? The damage has been done. The "Aggies" in our administration made their decisions about how to administer the families. "Involving" them is an afterthought. The real time for that has passed. What they do now in a semblance of "inclusion", or "remembering the fallen" as they say on the sweaters, is for public show.
Like It's been said, "If you want people to forget about a tragedy, you erect a statue." A&M's "desire" to involve the families is a sad misgiving. While the memorial is beautiful and owed to those lost, its cost was disgusting in the face of how they treated many of the families of those lost. The public sentiment was much more diligently controlled by A&M than the welfare of those necessitating care.
As far as I can tell, whatever is planned for this year is as worth doing with a few friends, in solemn moments of prayer, as would be allowing A&M to enjoy the fruits of a widespread gathering on their grounds which they can claim for their own.
These are matters for consideration of those promising young lives lost, not something A&M can put in a mailer about how many Aggies got together.
[This message has been edited by Bobunk RAB (edited 10/29/2009 4:25a).]