I can see the point that if you are not in favor of student bonfire, you should at least be neutral toward it and not against it. However, the perception exists around the state and country that even though the SB is not university sanctioned, it is still associated with Texas A&M and that is a big risk for all of us.
I know every precaution is being taken in regards to safety, but we all believed that prior to 11/18/99 too. Heaven forbid that another unexpected tragedy occurs ... not only will it be awful for the injured, but it would be the biggest black eye TAMU will ever suffer. And trust me, the naysayers will be back wondering why the administration didn't do anything to prevent it.
quote:
Considering the "old" Bonfire was done on students' own time almost exclusively with funds the leadership raised and resources they got donated, I fail to see much of a distinction (other than the fact that the University provided the stack site)
The University spent thousands of dollars annually towards Bonfire. In addition to having an advisor on staff, the University paid for maintenance and rehabilitation of the site, paid for security and emergency personnel during the building of Bonfire, paid for security and traffic control the night of the burning and trash cleanup afterward, the logistics of the event setup for the yell practice, etc, etc, etc.
I'm sure the cost of paying all the law enforcement folks must have been incredible.
[This message has been edited by AGnCS (edited 11/16/2004 12:20a).]