Refusing aid to migrants is a "grave sin" - Pope Francis

10,019 Views | 200 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by nortex97
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many lies can you cram into one post?
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please point to the lie...
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You may want to specify what the lie was next time...?
Probably something regarding Catholic Charities, but
I consider them to be one of the most cold hearted, evil organizations
in the world so am not rushing to their defense.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL, let them campaign on 'it's all lies that Haitians are doing bad things to animals, only to people.'



Christians must support Kamala. Oh, and infanticide is fake. Never happens. Well, ok, maybe 277 or more times, but otherwise.

Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.
Thanks for the response.
Now I'm getting out from between you and Nortex. that could be a danger area.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.
I apologize if I commingled Columbus and Springfield Ohio in my post. Let me know if you are accusing me of lying about something specifically about Haitians in Ohio. I forget, aren't you the poster who claims to teach kids in college about Karl Marx' impact on contract law, or am I misremembering that?
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, the claims that Haitians are eating pets is a lie and the claim that a "Haitian illegal immigrant" killed that kid is a lie and the parents are furious about how people like you have been politicizing that tragedy.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this


So Haitians as individuals will always eat cats, mud, and are all cannibals. You realize how sick you sound right now?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

Yes, the claims that Haitians are eating pets is a lie and the claim that a "Haitian illegal immigrant" killed that kid is a lie and the parents are furious about how people like you have been politicizing that tragedy.
On camera:


The kid's parent/dad didn't deny his son was killed by a Haitian (the facts of the wreck are easily obtainable/not in question), he is just so wrecked by it emotionally he is lashing out at Republicans. That's tragic, but your denial of it is pretty pathetic.



Other cases of Haitians killing Ohioans:


Anything else you are lying about today?

The higher risk of accidents/unsafe conditions are impacting how people commute, live, shop, and work in the area. Skyrocketing auto insurance rates, many public testimonials abound.
Quote:

The liberal media deny news about this, but videos of outrage by longtime residents have gone viral on X and TikTok. Most Haitians do not know how to drive, so car accidents in this small town have caused car insurance rates to skyrocket for everyone who lives there.
There are videos of residents complaining about pets disappearing, presumably taken for food by these migrants, who reportedly also decapitate ducks in the local park. Grocery store items are being opened up and consumed right off the shelves.
A 95-pound elderly woman testified at a public hearing, which is available on video, that "it is so unsafe. I have men that cannot speak English in my front yard screaming at me, throwing mattresses in my front yard, throwing trash in my front yard." She and her husband feel they are being forced out of their home of 45 years.
Independent journalist Tyler Oliveira has posted many video interviews of Springfield residents on X, including one viewed 1.7 million times of a black veteran explaining how he's been unable to obtain Medicaid while social services are overwhelmed by Haitian migrants. In another video showing an hours-long waiting line for benefits, an officer estimated that the ratio during the morning is 9-to-1 Haitians compared with locals.
I'd recommend any readers actually interested in the truth step outside the MSM bubble and check out what Haitian culture actually looks like and consider what the impact of 20K being flown into a small midwestern town might be. It is very un-Christian to support doing this to people, least of all with tax dollars.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this
This is an old racist trope used to stir up hatred toward immigrant groups. It's been done before and JD Vance and Donald Trump are doing it again. The current "rumors" likely started from an AMERICAN black woman (not a Haitian) who reportedly ate a cat in another city entirely. Even though the Springfield PD has said there have been no credible reports of this happening, people still run with it.

But it's the same deal as with the immigrant who killed the kid in a car wreck. It's all meant to rile up hate toward immigrants, except most of these immigrants are legal. It's pure racism, plain and simple.

Yet another characteristic of fascism that these people are flaunting in plain sight: unifying against a common enemy that people blame for society's problems.

It would be perfectly reasonable to raise concerns about how an influx of 20k people into a town of 50k has caused problems, such as strain on resources, increased auto accidents, and housing shortages. but that's not what's happening here.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this
This is an old racist trope used to stir up hatred toward immigrant groups. It's been done before and JD Vance and Donald Trump are doing it again. The current "rumors" likely started from an AMERICAN black woman (not a Haitian) who reportedly ate a cat in another city entirely. Even though the Springfield PD has said there have been no credible reports of this happening, people still run with it.

But it's the same deal as with the immigrant who killed the kid in a car wreck. It's all meant to rile up hate toward immigrants, except most of these immigrants are legal. It's pure racism, plain and simple.

Yet another characteristic of fascism that these people are flaunting in plain sight: unifying against a common enemy that people blame for society's problems.

It would be perfectly reasonable to raise concerns about how an influx of 20k people into a town of 50k has caused problems, such as strain on resources, increased auto accidents, and housing shortages. but that's not what's happening here.


Dude, they eat cats. They eat them in Haiti, and they eat them when they come over to the US. As I said, they eat dirt cookies that's a mix of dirt and fat.

This is a story much older than the recent Ohio flare up. Different cultures eat different things, as we remember from the Wuhan wet market, the Chinese eat things much more disgusting than cat.

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left. I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.

The vast majority of Haiti is Catholic. I'm a hardcore Catholic nationalist. I would love for them to be awesome. But they're not
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.


nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The current primary strongman of Haiti is known as "BBQ" for how he eats any rival…literally.



But hey, he wears a cross. Just some minor denominational differences. Lovely culture.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

The current primary strongman of Haiti is known as "BBQ" for how he eats any rival…literally.



But hey, he wears a cross. Just some minor denominational differences. Lovely culture.


There are videos of him on X literally eating people.

I will also point out that in 2004 the gang that deposed Haiti's first democratically elected President was named "the cannibals"
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.





Hey, just moderately curious, but what would cause something like that to happen in the early 19th century? Hmm? Why? Just racist people killing innocent whites? Totally nothing else happening? And how did nations like France respond? And how did that response change the situation in Haiti?

Also, "I don't care what every official in the city says, I just believe what validates my prejudices" is a hell of a tell.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this
This is an old racist trope used to stir up hatred toward immigrant groups. It's been done before and JD Vance and Donald Trump are doing it again. The current "rumors" likely started from an AMERICAN black woman (not a Haitian) who reportedly ate a cat in another city entirely. Even though the Springfield PD has said there have been no credible reports of this happening, people still run with it.

But it's the same deal as with the immigrant who killed the kid in a car wreck. It's all meant to rile up hate toward immigrants, except most of these immigrants are legal. It's pure racism, plain and simple.

Yet another characteristic of fascism that these people are flaunting in plain sight: unifying against a common enemy that people blame for society's problems.

It would be perfectly reasonable to raise concerns about how an influx of 20k people into a town of 50k has caused problems, such as strain on resources, increased auto accidents, and housing shortages. but that's not what's happening here.


Dude, they eat cats. They eat them in Haiti, and they eat them when they come over to the US. As I said, they eat dirt cookies that's a mix of dirt and fat.

This is a story much older than the recent Ohio flare up. Different cultures eat different things, as we remember from the Wuhan wet market, the Chinese eat things much more disgusting than cat.

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left. I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.

The vast majority of Haiti is Catholic. I'm a hardcore Catholic nationalist. I would love for them to be awesome. But they're not



How does incredible poverty influence people? Would you like to go through some less stellar moments in European history and the food choices made? Geo****ia is extremely common historically, particularly in populations with low iron and poor diet.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haiti had every right to fight off their genocidal colonizers, and the attempt to characterize them as savages for doing so is ridiculous.

No one disputes that Haiti is very poor and has an incredible amount of problems, but using that as an attempt to hate a nation of people is really gross.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

The claims in his post about the Haitian migrants in Springfield are absolutely lies.


Which ones. They're eating pets. Haitians eat cats. They eat mud cakes, they'll eat humans. You know this
This is an old racist trope used to stir up hatred toward immigrant groups. It's been done before and JD Vance and Donald Trump are doing it again. The current "rumors" likely started from an AMERICAN black woman (not a Haitian) who reportedly ate a cat in another city entirely. Even though the Springfield PD has said there have been no credible reports of this happening, people still run with it.

But it's the same deal as with the immigrant who killed the kid in a car wreck. It's all meant to rile up hate toward immigrants, except most of these immigrants are legal. It's pure racism, plain and simple.

Yet another characteristic of fascism that these people are flaunting in plain sight: unifying against a common enemy that people blame for society's problems.

It would be perfectly reasonable to raise concerns about how an influx of 20k people into a town of 50k has caused problems, such as strain on resources, increased auto accidents, and housing shortages. but that's not what's happening here.


Dude, they eat cats. They eat them in Haiti, and they eat them when they come over to the US. As I said, they eat dirt cookies that's a mix of dirt and fat.

This is a story much older than the recent Ohio flare up. Different cultures eat different things, as we remember from the Wuhan wet market, the Chinese eat things much more disgusting than cat.

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left. I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.

The vast majority of Haiti is Catholic. I'm a hardcore Catholic nationalist. I would love for them to be awesome. But they're not



How does incredible poverty influence people? Would you like to go through some less stellar moments in European history and the food choices made? Geo****ia is extremely common historically, particularly in populations with low iron and poor diet.


So to be clear, you've fact checked Haitian diets and now certify Trump's claim as true?
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.





Hey, just moderately curious, but what would cause something like that to happen in the early 19th century? Hmm? Why? Just racist people killing innocent whites? Totally nothing else happening? And how did nations like France respond? And how did that response change the situation in Haiti?

Also, "I don't care what every official in the city says, I just believe what validates my prejudices" is a hell of a tell.



Just say "they had it coming to them" and save yourself the words next time
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

Haiti had every right to fight off their genocidal colonizers, and the attempt to characterize them as savages for doing so is ridiculous.

No one disputes that Haiti is very poor and has an incredible amount of problems, but using that as an attempt to hate a nation of people is really gross.


"Genocidal colonizers"? You think the French wanted to genocide the Haitians, but weren't able to complete the job? If the French wanted to genocide the Haitians, they'd be genocided.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember, the effects of anti-immigrant talk are by design

barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
Colonizers have tried to genocide the colonized since forever. And again, it doesn't have to mean killing every last person. It can also mean destroying entire societies such that they cannot function and will be gone within a generation.

I know I shouldn't be shocked by anything anymore, but it's really shocking hearing conservative Christians continuously defend these things (or deny them), and scold colonized people for resisting their own extermination. But if anything it's a lesson that history really never changes.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.





Hey, just moderately curious, but what would cause something like that to happen in the early 19th century? Hmm? Why? Just racist people killing innocent whites? Totally nothing else happening? And how did nations like France respond? And how did that response change the situation in Haiti?

Also, "I don't care what every official in the city says, I just believe what validates my prejudices" is a hell of a tell.



Just say "they had it coming to them" and save yourself the words next time


What was the life span of your average sugar plantation slave before the Haitian Revolution?
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
Colonizers have tried to genocide the colonized since forever. And again, it doesn't have to mean killing every last person. It can also mean destroying entire societies such that they cannot function and will be gone within a generation.

I know I shouldn't be shocked by anything anymore, but it's really shocking hearing conservative Christians continuously defend these things (or deny them), and scold colonized people for resisting their own extermination. But if anything it's a lesson that history really never changes.


Give me a break. They slaughtered anyone with a drop of white blood. The Belgians were absolutely deserving of getting killed by the Congolese but that doesn't mean the Stanleyville Massacre and murder of women and children was warranted.

Again, if the French had wanted to destroy the Haitians so that these gone within a generation; there would be no Haiti today. The French had the power to do so, and the Haitians could not have stopped them.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Haiti had every right to fight off their genocidal colonizers, and the attempt to characterize them as savages for doing so is ridiculous.

No one disputes that Haiti is very poor and has an incredible amount of problems, but using that as an attempt to hate a nation of people is really gross.


"Genocidal colonizers"? You think the French wanted to genocide the Haitians, but weren't able to complete the job? If the French wanted to genocide the Haitians, they'd be genocided.


What was the life span of the average sugar plantation slave on St. Domingue? And while they were alive, what were their conditions like?
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
Colonizers have tried to genocide the colonized since forever. And again, it doesn't have to mean killing every last person. It can also mean destroying entire societies such that they cannot function and will be gone within a generation.

I know I shouldn't be shocked by anything anymore, but it's really shocking hearing conservative Christians continuously defend these things (or deny them), and scold colonized people for resisting their own extermination. But if anything it's a lesson that history really never changes.


Give me a break. They slaughtered anyone with a drop of white blood. The Belgians were absolutely deserving of getting killed by the Congolese but that doesn't mean the Stanleyville Massacre and murder of women and children was warranted.

Again, if the French had wanted to destroy the Haitians so that these gone within a generation; there would be no Haiti today. The French had the power to do so, and the Haitians could not have stopped them.


Really? Maybe you should actually read a book about the Haitian Revolution.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.





Hey, just moderately curious, but what would cause something like that to happen in the early 19th century? Hmm? Why? Just racist people killing innocent whites? Totally nothing else happening? And how did nations like France respond? And how did that response change the situation in Haiti?

Also, "I don't care what every official in the city says, I just believe what validates my prejudices" is a hell of a tell.



Just say "they had it coming to them" and save yourself the words next time


What was the life span of your average sugar plantation slave before the Haitian Revolution?


I believe it was around 20. However, the life expectancy for the average Frenchman was 25 at the same time.

Presently Haitian life expectancy is 64 years, vs 82 for France.

Nearly the same proportion.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
Colonizers have tried to genocide the colonized since forever. And again, it doesn't have to mean killing every last person. It can also mean destroying entire societies such that they cannot function and will be gone within a generation.

I know I shouldn't be shocked by anything anymore, but it's really shocking hearing conservative Christians continuously defend these things (or deny them), and scold colonized people for resisting their own extermination. But if anything it's a lesson that history really never changes.


Give me a break. They slaughtered anyone with a drop of white blood. The Belgians were absolutely deserving of getting killed by the Congolese but that doesn't mean the Stanleyville Massacre and murder of women and children was warranted.

Again, if the French had wanted to destroy the Haitians so that these gone within a generation; there would be no Haiti today. The French had the power to do so, and the Haitians could not have stopped them.


This is absolutely not true. Polish legionaries and German settlers sided with the Haitians as did a large number of mixed race people. The brutality was against the French.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quote:

I don't know why the rush to defend Haiti from the left.
Because the local police has stated multiple times there have been no credible reports of immigrants eating people's cats. You can't just spread unsubstantiated rumors and get away with it.
Quote:

I remember the outrage when Trump called it a "****hole" years ago.
because it was racist. and a sitting president shouldn't say things like that. we all know Haiti is poor and has a ton of problems, but it does not mean things like this need to be said.


It's not racist, haiti is a ****hole country. Haiti is racist. They killed all the whites, and when they were all gone they went ahead and killed all the mixed race just to be safe.

I don't care what the local police say, there are too many reports from locals about animals disappearing that fits into line with what Haitians are literally known for to be just smoke.





Hey, just moderately curious, but what would cause something like that to happen in the early 19th century? Hmm? Why? Just racist people killing innocent whites? Totally nothing else happening? And how did nations like France respond? And how did that response change the situation in Haiti?

Also, "I don't care what every official in the city says, I just believe what validates my prejudices" is a hell of a tell.



Just say "they had it coming to them" and save yourself the words next time


What was the life span of your average sugar plantation slave before the Haitian Revolution?


I believe it was around 20. However, the life expectancy for the average Frenchman was 25 at the same time.

Presently Haitian life expectancy is 64 years, vs 82 for France.

Nearly the same proportion.


No. What was the life expectancy of a man brought into slavery on St. Domingue and sent to work on a sugar plantation? How long did they survive on average? The answer for sugar plantations was 2-3 years. 7 years on average if you include coffee and tobacco plantations. We have records of punishments that include amputation, staking individuals out so they could be swarmed by insects, burned alive, raped as punishment, etc, by the "Christian" gentlemen of France.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

Quo Vadis? said:

barbacoa taco said:

wow, where have I heard this statement before? hmm


There's a huge difference between the 18th century and the 21st. You could get away with genocide back then, you can't now.
Colonizers have tried to genocide the colonized since forever. And again, it doesn't have to mean killing every last person. It can also mean destroying entire societies such that they cannot function and will be gone within a generation.

I know I shouldn't be shocked by anything anymore, but it's really shocking hearing conservative Christians continuously defend these things (or deny them), and scold colonized people for resisting their own extermination. But if anything it's a lesson that history really never changes.


Give me a break. They slaughtered anyone with a drop of white blood. The Belgians were absolutely deserving of getting killed by the Congolese but that doesn't mean the Stanleyville Massacre and murder of women and children was warranted.

Again, if the French had wanted to destroy the Haitians so that these gone within a generation; there would be no Haiti today. The French had the power to do so, and the Haitians could not have stopped them.


This is absolutely not true. Polish legionaries and German settlers sided with the Haitians as did a large number of mixed race people. The brutality was against the French.


Yes, you're right. The ones that helped them kill the other Europeans they allowed to live. However you'll notice this quote doesn't say Frenchmen:

""For our declaration of independence, we should have the skin of a white man for parchment, his skull for an inkwell, his blood for ink, and a bayonet for a pen!"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.