The Vatican with the most tone-deaf release possible given the timing

1,800 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by Quo Vadis?
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This should go over well without commentary from any world leaders who have been absolutely castigated for their opinions on illegal immigration
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quo Vadis? said:



This should go over well without commentary from any world leaders who have been absolutely castigated for their opinions on illegal immigration

Do as I say, not as I do.
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Abbott just found a new destination for the migrant buses.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder what vatican jail is like.. similar to vatican monkery right?
Scoopen Skwert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
swimmerbabe11 said:

I wonder what vatican jail is like.. similar to vatican monkery right?
Same but less sodomy.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In case you missed it, in 2003, the RCC listed 5 moral principals regarding immigration. Number 3 reads as follows,

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."
“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

In case you missed it, in 2003, the RCC listed 5 moral principals regarding immigration. Number 3 reads as follows,

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."

...which makes the irony so delicious.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
747Ag said:

PabloSerna said:

In case you missed it, in 2003, the RCC listed 5 moral principals regarding immigration. Number 3 reads as follows,

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."

...which makes the irony so delicious.
You wrote, "Do as I say, not as I do"

I guess I don't see the irony, maybe you can elaborate? I wrote what the RCC said publicly 24 years ago about controlling borders which they say is a moral principal. Do you understand something differently?


“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
lobopride
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

747Ag said:

PabloSerna said:

In case you missed it, in 2003, the RCC listed 5 moral principals regarding immigration. Number 3 reads as follows,

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."

...which makes the irony so delicious.
You wrote, "Do as I say, not as I do"

I guess I don't see the irony, maybe you can elaborate? I wrote what the RCC said publicly 24 years ago about controlling borders which they say is a moral principal. Do you understand something differently?





Maybe when the Pope calls this a "grave sin"

https://www.usccb.org/news/2024/pope-driving-away-migrants-grave-sin
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What part of this message do have a problem with?

"Everyone, he added, must join forces "to combat human trafficking" and "stop the criminal traffickers who mercilessly exploit the misery of others."

If you read the message in its entirety and factor in that sovereign nations have a right to regulate immigration at their borders - it all makes sense to me from a Christian moral perspective. How do you see it?
“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
lobopride
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I tried to give the Pope the benefit of the doubt in case he was differentiating a person's moral responsibility versus a government's, but his statement is so broad I was unable to do so.

Pope's actions: In a decree issued last month by the Holy See, the monetary sanctions and prison sentences for those who violate the strict security regulations of Vatican City have been considerably increased.

Pope's words: "It needs to be said clearly: There are those who systematically work by all means to drive away migrants, and this, when done knowingly and deliberately, is a grave sin," he said during his general audience Aug. 28.

Pope's actions: The document, signed by Cardinal Fernando Vrguez Alzaga, president of the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State, provides for monetary fines ranging from 10,000 to 25,000 euros (about $10,200 to $25,700) and prison sentences ranging from one to four years.

Pope's words: But migrants cannot be deterred from those deadly crossings "through more restrictive laws, nor through the militarization of borders, nor through rejections," the pope said. "Instead, we will achieve it by expanding safe and legal avenues for migrants, by facilitating sanctuary for those fleeing wars, violence, persecution and many calamities; we will achieve it by fostering in every way a global governance of migration based on justice, fraternity and solidarity."

I am not a Catholic, so my opinion of this Pope is irrelevant, but he looks at a minimum inconsistent with his own values if not fully hypocritical.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes or no question.

The Pope by decree of the magisterium, has stated clearly that a sovereign nation, which the Vatican is, has a right to control their borders. This is one of five moral principles to be factored into immigration policy.

Do you agree?
“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While I can agree that the narrative that has been spun by some that the Pope/RCC is pro undocumented immigrants all the way, no breaks- this is not a full understanding of their position.

It's rooted in the understanding that we (at some point in time) were all strangers in a land. Being a good neighbor is being able to do what you can- some can do more than others.

“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel like there was recently a thread that implies the amount of sodomy might be similar....
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

While I can agree that the narrative that has been spun by some that the Pope/RCC is pro undocumented immigrants all the way, no breaks- this is not a full understanding of their position.

It's rooted in the understanding that we (at some point in time) were all strangers in a land. Being a good neighbor is being able to do what you can- some can do more than others.




I would say the Pope is 99.97% pro- undocumented migrants and has used his voice to loudly critique virtually any and all attempts to stop illegals from reaching the country.

The only possible thing he has said is that possibly, and he doesn't know, but some might have to be sent back; but first of all they need to be welcomed.

I'm not sure how that jives with a country having sovereign control over their borders (hint, it doesn't) but it is the most "pro-sovereignty" thing he has said.

Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmerbabe11 said:

I feel like there was recently a thread that implies the amount of sodomy might be similar....


We call that a Synodal experience now
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

In case you missed it, in 2003, the RCC listed 5 moral principals regarding immigration. Number 3 reads as follows,

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."
2003 was two popes ago!
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
*sigh*

The rhetoric from Rome and other episcopacies has been mostly on welcoming the stranger with no discussion towards the rights of the state nor the duties of the immigrants. Vatican City is fully justified in this action, but the aforementioned rhetoric paints them as hypocrites. Would that the princes of the Church preach the fullness of Her teaching on a topic rather than snippets.
Scoopen Skwert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not very liberation theology of them.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scoopen Skwert said:

Not very liberation theology of them.
Yeah, well, it's a damnable communist "theology" so the less of it we hear from Church prelates the better.
Scoopen Skwert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
747Ag said:

Scoopen Skwert said:

Not very liberation theology of them.
Yeah, well, it's a damnable communist "theology" so the less of it we hear from Church prelates the better.
I was a direct witness to the sinful turn within the formation of priests. Therefore my disgust at the acceptance of homosexual acts and communism.

UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quo Vadis? said:

PabloSerna said:

While I can agree that the narrative that has been spun by some that the Pope/RCC is pro undocumented immigrants all the way, no breaks- this is not a full understanding of their position.

It's rooted in the understanding that we (at some point in time) were all strangers in a land. Being a good neighbor is being able to do what you can- some can do more than others.




I would say the Pope is 99.97% pro- undocumented migrants and has used his voice to loudly critique virtually any and all attempts to stop illegals from reaching the country.

The only possible thing he has said is that possibly, and he doesn't know, but some might have to be sent back; but first of all they need to be welcomed.

I'm not sure how that jives with a country having sovereign control over their borders (hint, it doesn't) but it is the most "pro-sovereignty" thing he has said.




I think the Pope has that element of hatred for America common among many born in Latin America. It is, like antisemitism, always lurking beneath the surface and the fact that Latin America has many failing governments drives some of that animus. The facts of failing governance and the evidence of so many fleeing is testimony that Spanish (read Catholic) colonization is far less successful than English (read Protestant) colonization. That's what really torques him, IMHO.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTExan said:

Quo Vadis? said:

PabloSerna said:

While I can agree that the narrative that has been spun by some that the Pope/RCC is pro undocumented immigrants all the way, no breaks- this is not a full understanding of their position.

It's rooted in the understanding that we (at some point in time) were all strangers in a land. Being a good neighbor is being able to do what you can- some can do more than others.




I would say the Pope is 99.97% pro- undocumented migrants and has used his voice to loudly critique virtually any and all attempts to stop illegals from reaching the country.

The only possible thing he has said is that possibly, and he doesn't know, but some might have to be sent back; but first of all they need to be welcomed.

I'm not sure how that jives with a country having sovereign control over their borders (hint, it doesn't) but it is the most "pro-sovereignty" thing he has said.




I think the Pope has that element of hatred for America common among many born in Latin America. It is, like antisemitism, always lurking beneath the surface and the fact that Latin America has many failing governments drives some of that animus. The facts of failing governance and the evidence of so many fleeing is testimony that Spanish (read Catholic) colonization is far less successful than English (read Protestant) colonization. That's what really torques him, IMHO.


I think he, like everyone is a product of his environment. He was formed in a hotbed of outright marxism and liberation theology in post WWII Argentina. He's only 8-9 years younger than Che Guevara, and both grew up in practically the same area. I don't think he likes anything that has to do with tradition, hierarchy, or nobility, likely because it reminds him of the colonial church. I don't think his biases are purposeful, but they're ingrained none the same.

My job as a Catholic is to take what is good from Pope Francis, and meditate on what I don't agree with or understand, I owe him at least that much. I can say that he has made me more aware of the poor, and the unjustly marginalized during his papacy.
The Banned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTExan said:

Quo Vadis? said:

PabloSerna said:

While I can agree that the narrative that has been spun by some that the Pope/RCC is pro undocumented immigrants all the way, no breaks- this is not a full understanding of their position.

It's rooted in the understanding that we (at some point in time) were all strangers in a land. Being a good neighbor is being able to do what you can- some can do more than others.




I would say the Pope is 99.97% pro- undocumented migrants and has used his voice to loudly critique virtually any and all attempts to stop illegals from reaching the country.

The only possible thing he has said is that possibly, and he doesn't know, but some might have to be sent back; but first of all they need to be welcomed.

I'm not sure how that jives with a country having sovereign control over their borders (hint, it doesn't) but it is the most "pro-sovereignty" thing he has said.




I think the Pope has that element of hatred for America common among many born in Latin America. It is, like antisemitism, always lurking beneath the surface and the fact that Latin America has many failing governments drives some of that animus. The facts of failing governance and the evidence of so many fleeing is testimony that Spanish (read Catholic) colonization is far less successful than English (read Protestant) colonization. That's what really torques him, IMHO.


Just to give props to how blessed we are by God to be in this country: all other "Protestant" colonies kind of suck too. Australia and NZ are lost to woke ideology. India never really took off. The African colonies failed. I know it's easy to look at it as Protestant vs Catholic, but the reality is that America alone has been so lucky. The same America that included Maryland (Mary Land) to start and later incorporated very Catholic Texas which houses Texas A&M, which houses the largest Catholic student population in the cmuntry.

Francis has issues America for its success, I'm almost certain. But I think it has more to do with national/racial pride than denominational.

PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scoopen Skwert said:

747Ag said:

Scoopen Skwert said:

Not very liberation theology of them.
Yeah, well, it's a damnable communist "theology" so the less of it we hear from Church prelates the better.
I was a direct witness to the sinful turn within the formation of priests. Therefore my disgust at the acceptance of homosexual acts and communism.





Whoa- that is some loaded tea there- care to elaborate?
“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I chuckled out load when I read the first part of this then realized you are being serious.

I know quite a few folks from Latin America and will be sure to ask them (in a serious voice) "why do you hate us??"

“Falsehood flies and the truth comes limping after it” -Jonathan Swift, 1710
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

I chuckled out load when I read the first part of this then realized you are being serious.

I know quite a few folks from Latin America and will be sure to ask them (in a serious voice) "why do you hate us??"


Anti-Americanism is an old saw and cultural theme among both European and Latin American intellectuals-denizens of universities who see the vibrancy, dynamism and excesses of American capitalism as being assaults on their identities. The European Union's economy has lost a lot of ground in the past 2 decades against the US economy in terms of growth for a variety of reasons, but the Euro has lost value. I spent a couple of weeks in Italy in 2011 and the ratio was $1.39 US to 1 Euro. It is now $1.03 to 1 Euro. It is the same with Latin American currencies, almost all having lost value, especially the Mexican peso.
For common people who benefit from trade with America or tourism, it may be quite different, but the intellectuals and academics of these countries are not our friends, including the current pope.
It was quite different under John Paul II, who came from eastern Europe.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is my beloved Vatican once again supporting national sovereignty and totally not focusing on the US while turning a blind eye to China

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.