Highly recommend the book below

11,104 Views | 149 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by dermdoc
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And here is a link discussing what the early church believed

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2017/04/indeed-many-universalism-early-church/

The problem is that both sides have their dogmatic supporters. There was, and always has been, a plurality of views on eternal destinies.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TeddyAg0422
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Both sides have supporters, but there's relatively so few supporting universalism rather than ECT. There are maybe 8 to 10 early fathers supporting universalism (and it's maybe even thought these were more ambiguous on the matter rather than supporting it outright). On the other hand, there are easily at least 30+ fathers that taught ECT, either implicitly or explicitly. ECT has been by far and away the most popular view Hell throughout the entire existence of Christianity.
I know there's also the opinion that the eastern fathers were more open to universalists ideas. While this is true when comparing them to the west, ECT was still the popular view in the east. Out of 30 major eastern fathers, only ~8 supported universalism. In the west, the only argument that could really be made would be for Ambrose, but that doesn't work; Ambrose took a similar view to how Pope Francis did recently where they said they'd like to hope Hell is empty.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TeddyAg0422 said:

Both sides have supporters, but there's relatively so few supporting universalism rather than ECT. There are maybe 8 to 10 early fathers supporting universalism (and it's maybe even thought these were more ambiguous on the matter rather than supporting it outright). On the other hand, there are easily at least 30+ fathers that taught ECT, either implicitly or explicitly. ECT has been by far and away the most popular view Hell throughout the entire existence of Christianity.
I know there's also the opinion that the eastern fathers were more open to universalists ideas. While this is true when comparing them to the west, ECT was still the popular view in the east. Out of 30 major eastern fathers, only ~8 supported universalism. In the west, the only argument that could really be made would be for Ambrose, but that doesn't work; Ambrose took a similar view to how Pope Francis did recently where they said they'd like to hope Hell is empty.


I can handle ECT if the belief is people choose hell themselves via free will. Like CS Lewis and the majority of Christian theologians and Christian denominations.

I can not handle ECT hell without free will choice of people created by a loving Father.

And I believe the majority of church fathers who believed in ECT hell would agree with me.

I will also say that I believe ECT hell has less Scriptural suppprt than annihilationism and possibly even Christian Universalism. Lots of eisegeses going on.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TeddyAg0422
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Absolutely, I 100% agree with you. I don't hold to the Calvinist view at all and think it's false and evil.

And you're right, I think the ECT fathers would agree with you that ECT without free will is wrong.
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, we have been through this, Calvinists are the scourge of Protestantism.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10andBOUNCE said:

Yes, we have been through this, Calvinists are the scourge of Protestantism.
Not my words my friend.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TRL-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that's the case why did he tell the thief on the cross while being crucified, "today, you will be with Me in Paradise"?
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRL-Ag said:

If that's the case why did he tell the thief on the cross while being crucified, "today, you will be with Me in Paradise"?
Sorry and maybe it is me, but what does that mean to ultimate reconciliation?

Are you against the other crucified guy getting to enjoy the presence of God after being punished?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TRL-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not at all! We've all fallen short.

My question was in regards to your comment about us laying in waiting. I need to watch your video you shared unless you would like to break it down a little.

Our soul goes & our body joins at the rapture?
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRL-Ag said:

Not at all! We've all fallen short.

My question was in regards to your comment about us laying in waiting. I need to watch your video you shared unless you would like to break it down a little.

Our soul goes & our body joins at the rapture?
I do not believe in the rapture.

The whole "Left Behind" stuff is not Biblical.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.