Dammit
Voice app
"Commend"
Voice app
"Commend"
FTACo88-FDT24dad said:
This recent discovery is interesting in light of this discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/live/2SYFPf7ai4U?si=bdlhIxZt13BHrahE
94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:
This recent discovery is interesting in light of this discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/live/2SYFPf7ai4U?si=bdlhIxZt13BHrahE
Have you asked yourself why Protestants don't find this the least bit disturbing? I mean, it's not like he found a record of Joseph's first marriage that produced those 6 siblings.
FTACo88-FDT24dad said:94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:
This recent discovery is interesting in light of this discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/live/2SYFPf7ai4U?si=bdlhIxZt13BHrahE
Have you asked yourself why Protestants don't find this the least bit disturbing? I mean, it's not like he found a record of Joseph's first marriage that produced those 6 siblings.
I genuinely don't care what Protestants think about this.
94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:
This recent discovery is interesting in light of this discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/live/2SYFPf7ai4U?si=bdlhIxZt13BHrahE
Have you asked yourself why Protestants don't find this the least bit disturbing? I mean, it's not like he found a record of Joseph's first marriage that produced those 6 siblings.
I genuinely don't care what Protestants think about this.
Fair enough, but that wasn't the tone of the link.
Just another play for ecumenism which is ramping up. None of that gives justification for Vatican I/II. Second half of his video are just quote mines.FTACo88-FDT24dad said:94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:94chem said:FTACo88-FDT24dad said:
This recent discovery is interesting in light of this discussion:
https://www.youtube.com/live/2SYFPf7ai4U?si=bdlhIxZt13BHrahE
Have you asked yourself why Protestants don't find this the least bit disturbing? I mean, it's not like he found a record of Joseph's first marriage that produced those 6 siblings.
I genuinely don't care what Protestants think about this.
Fair enough, but that wasn't the tone of the link.
I was directing it more at the Orthodox posters who had posted above.
Captain Pablo said:
Dammit
Voice app
"Commend"
Severian the Torturer said:Captain Pablo said:
Dammit
Voice app
"Commend"
no problem brother, I tagged it so you'd see it but I've deleted it now.
Maximus of Tejas said:10andBOUNCE said:
As a protestant I am completely fine with authority within the Church as what Scripture outlines (Elders, Deacons, Discipline, etc.) in addition to our need to honor secular authority (1 Peter). Protestants were protesting the made up office of Pope and other things the was of "human tradition."
Weird that the Bible was clear on Elders and Deacons but for some reason when mysterious (or at best very convoluted) when it came to the papacy.
If there's one phrase I'm tired of hearing it's "the Bible is clear" lol. Ya I guess that's why the reformers all disagreed with each other pretty much immediately. Luther and Zwingli disagreeing on the Eucharist is pretty much all you need to know for the entire history of Protestantism.
AgLiving06 said:Maximus of Tejas said:10andBOUNCE said:
As a protestant I am completely fine with authority within the Church as what Scripture outlines (Elders, Deacons, Discipline, etc.) in addition to our need to honor secular authority (1 Peter). Protestants were protesting the made up office of Pope and other things the was of "human tradition."
Weird that the Bible was clear on Elders and Deacons but for some reason when mysterious (or at best very convoluted) when it came to the papacy.
If there's one phrase I'm tired of hearing it's "the Bible is clear" lol. Ya I guess that's why the reformers all disagreed with each other pretty much immediately. Luther and Zwingli disagreeing on the Eucharist is pretty much all you need to know for the entire history of Protestantism.
And likewise, I'm so tired of these pretty ill-informed takes from Romanists.
Let's state the obvious. At Marburg, Lutherans and Zwinglians agreed on 14 major points. The one they did disagree with on was the Lord's Supper.
So it's incorrect to make blanket statements that are so easily proven wrong.
Yes, Luther and Zwingli disagreed on a 15th point. History and Scripture show Zwingli was wrong. It's a shame Zwingli let his own views overshadow the history of the church and what Scripture says.
Likewise, I could point out that nobody in the Christian church agrees with the novel view of the Eucharist that Rome created as evidence that eccesialists groups such as Rome don't do much either.
FTACo88-FDT24dad said:10andBOUNCE said:
As a protestant I am completely fine with authority within the Church as what Scripture outlines (Elders, Deacons, Discipline, etc.) in addition to our need to honor secular authority (1 Peter). Protestants were protesting the made up office of Pope and other things the was of "human tradition."
Weird that the Bible was clear on Elders and Deacons but for some reason when mysterious (or at best very convoluted) when it came to the papacy.
And if the Bible was intended as a rule book for Christian ecclesial governance and praxis then that would be relevant. Thankfully that's not true.
CrackerJackAg said:
ho do you listen to? The Baptist, the transgendered Methodist, the reasonable enough sounding tradition Anglican, the Mormon or Jehovah's Witness?
Quote:
and how they view the Cross etc…
10andBOUNCE said:CrackerJackAg said:
ho do you listen to? The Baptist, the transgendered Methodist, the reasonable enough sounding tradition Anglican, the Mormon or Jehovah's Witness?![]()
10andBOUNCE said:
I can't help other people's misconceptions including yourself (shrug)
My theology is generally informed by the actual protestant reformation OGs so I cannot speak to the further offshoots. I understand your disdain towards them all though.
Maybe the actual reformers should have trademarked "Protestant" to better protect it's usage.
10andBOUNCE said:
I didn't know EO folk had any sense of humor