Sirs, what must I do to be saved?

2,880 Views | 82 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by Zobel
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TSJ said:

dermdoc said:

CrackerJackAg said:

dermdoc said:

I have a ton of Catholic/Orthodox friends. And numerous priests. We laugh about the perceived differences in soteriology.

We all believe basically the same thing with a different emphasis on Sacraments. When anybody starts saying Catholicism is a works based salvation deal I ignore them as they have no idea what they are talking about.

And when Catholics say Protestants believe all you have to do is believe in Jesus and repentance and true faith are not part of the process I turn them off also.




You have Orthodox Priest laugh at the "perceived differences in Soteriology"? I don't believe that is true. I assume you mean Catholic. I don't know any Orthodox Priest that would say that.

I would agree that Protestants have a really weird and inaccurate view towards Catholicism. I'm not Catholic but I hear it pretty regularly and I end up defending Catholics.

As a Protestant for the first 30 years of my life I fully understand Protestantism. The Orthodox are very different. It take a pretty reductionist mindset to come to that conclusion or you don't understand Orthodoxy.

Catholics and Traditional Protestants are basically the same to us. Whacky Protestant is a whole another thing all together and are not identifiable to me as Christianity following the same Christ I know.

I probably should have not used the term soteriology. My Orthodox friends and priest I know frequently talk theology. I misspoke. Sorry.


Derm, does Fr Joseph go to your meetings? He's told me he goes to local priest/minister meeting before.

In CS? We have one semi retired Methodist minister. No Orthodox people in our group. The Orthodox I know are in Beaumont where I practice. I have become pretty good friends with the Orthodox priest there. We enjoy talking theology.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
TSJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dermdoc said:

TSJ said:

dermdoc said:

CrackerJackAg said:

dermdoc said:

I have a ton of Catholic/Orthodox friends. And numerous priests. We laugh about the perceived differences in soteriology.

We all believe basically the same thing with a different emphasis on Sacraments. When anybody starts saying Catholicism is a works based salvation deal I ignore them as they have no idea what they are talking about.

And when Catholics say Protestants believe all you have to do is believe in Jesus and repentance and true faith are not part of the process I turn them off also.




You have Orthodox Priest laugh at the "perceived differences in Soteriology"? I don't believe that is true. I assume you mean Catholic. I don't know any Orthodox Priest that would say that.

I would agree that Protestants have a really weird and inaccurate view towards Catholicism. I'm not Catholic but I hear it pretty regularly and I end up defending Catholics.

As a Protestant for the first 30 years of my life I fully understand Protestantism. The Orthodox are very different. It take a pretty reductionist mindset to come to that conclusion or you don't understand Orthodoxy.

Catholics and Traditional Protestants are basically the same to us. Whacky Protestant is a whole another thing all together and are not identifiable to me as Christianity following the same Christ I know.

I probably should have not used the term soteriology. My Orthodox friends and priest I know frequently talk theology. I misspoke. Sorry.


Derm, does Fr Joseph go to your meetings? He's told me he goes to local priest/minister meeting before.

In CS? We have one semi retired Methodist minister. No Orthodox people in our group. The Orthodox I know are in Beaumont where I practice. I have become pretty good friends with the Orthodox priest there. We enjoy talking theology.


CS yes. Different group then.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dermdoc said:

The Banned said:

10andBOUNCE said:

Quote:

on what basis can you say they don't have a true faith?

Don't think we can say that

So then good works don't necessarily come out of a true faith? A true faith can have no good fruit?

Thief on the cross?

I am not the one to judge someone's true faith.


Not that you are, but in my experience the people who point to the thief on the cross as a defense of sola fide are very often themselves committing the sin of presumption. I understand the desire to be assured of your own salvation, but if you allow yourself to find solace in the fact that you're not as bad as THAT and he was saved by his faith, you're probably in big trouble.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

dermdoc said:

The Banned said:

10andBOUNCE said:

Quote:

on what basis can you say they don't have a true faith?

Don't think we can say that

So then good works don't necessarily come out of a true faith? A true faith can have no good fruit?

Thief on the cross?

I am not the one to judge someone's true faith.


Not that you are, but in my experience the people who point to the thief on the cross as a defense of sola fide are very often themselves committing the sin of presumption. I understand the desire to be assured of your own salvation, but if you allow yourself to find solace in the fact that you're not as bad as THAT and he was saved by his faith, you're probably in big trouble.

I hear what you are saying but I focus more on what Jesus did for me. I honestly think that when you get to that point, you produce fruit not from you but rather from Christ in you.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Angry Jonathan Zaludek
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Angry Jonathan Zaludek said:

(pisteu): The verb "to believe," meaning to have faith in, to trust, to rely on, to entrust.. (Total dependence and not just intellectual acknowledgement)


An evangelist several years ago spoke of a famous French tightrope walker named Charles Blondin. He did a lot of feats from high above the ground, including sitting on a chair balanced on a tightrope wire. One of his shows included pushing a wheelbarrow from one side of a canyon to another along thr Niagara River, 160 feet off the ground. Blondin asked the crowd, "who thinks I can do this wiith a person inside the wheelbarrow?". Lots of hands went up. He then asked for a volunteer, and every raised hand quickly lowered.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So you might say only those who had faith would get in the wheelbarrow? Raising the hand wasn't faith?
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Raising the hand" is not something I would put much stock into.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im doing a study of the book of Galatians: this is arguably the most important book in the New Testament for understanding the function and freedom of faith.

While the Book of Hebrews (specifically Hebrews 11) gives you the definition of faith ("the assurance of things hoped for"), Galatians gives you the mechanics of faithhow it actually works in your relationship with God.

Galatians is a perfect study for identifying what faith is:
1. It Defines Faith as "Trust over Effort"
In Galatians, Paul is writing to people who thought they needed to "add" something to their faith (like following religious laws or rituals) to be truly right with God.
* The Lesson: Galatians identifies faith as reliance, not performance. Paul famously asks, "Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?" (Galatians 3:2).
* Identification: You identify faith here by what it stops doingit stops trying to earn God's favor and starts resting in what Christ already did.
2. It Explains the "Exchanged Life"
Galatians contains one of the most powerful definitions of the "life of faith" in the entire Bible:
> "I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me." (Galatians 2:20)
>
* Identification: Faith isn't just a belief you hold in your head; it is the "oxygen" of your daily life. It is the act of letting Christ's life replace your own struggle.
3. It Shows Faith as the "Key to the Prison"
Galatians 3 describes the Old Testament Law as a "guardian" or a "prison" that kept us boxed in until faith arrived.
* The Lesson: Before faith came, we were "held captive under the law" (Galatians 3:23).
* Identification: Faith is identified as the arrival of freedom. It is the transition from being a "slave" (trying to follow rules to stay safe) to being a "son or daughter" (being loved because of whose family you belong to).
4. It Links Faith to Love
Often, people worry that "faith alone" means you can just do whatever you want. Galatians corrects this by showing what "true" faith looks like in action.
* The Lesson: "For in Christ Jesus... the only thing that counts is faith working through love" (Galatians 5:6).
* Identification: You identify real faith by its "fruit." If faith is the root, love and the "Fruit of the Spirit" (Galatians 5:22-23) are the evidence that the faith is alive.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for that.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Taking a faith story and putting it on the screen makes it much more powerful

Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think you're starting with a lot of presuppositions and then reading them into the text here.

Galatians is not a systematic theology or a description of mechanisms of salvation or faith.

It doesn't define faith as trust over effort. This is a false dichotomy that you (or chatGPT?) put forward without really any defense. And I'm not sure what "truly right with God" means?

Faith as reliance versus performance isn't in the text. The contrast between "works of the law or by hearing with faith" is not doing versus trusting, and it definitely isn't works versus faith. It is works of the Torah versus hearing with faith. Works of the Torah as a stand-in for being a Jew, because following the Torah is what made you a Judaean, ie, a Jew.

The Torah isn't a "prison" and you can't put "prison" in quotes because the word isn't in the text. A guardian or tutor is what is described there, "held captive" is not as of a prisoner, but as of a ward - St Paul uses the same phrase in 2 Cor 11:32 to describe a king guarding a city, or in Phil 4:7 of the Spirit guarding our hearts and minds. St Peter uses it as of God protecting us. So the Torah was our guardian. Which is exactly what it was - a way to separate a people from a fallen world to be a light to the rest of the world. It was guard rails so that God could dwell with those people without destroying them due to their sin, and a way to deal with that sin and its effects when it happens. The Torah was a guardian ... why? for some abstract freedom? No - the Torah was the trainer, the teacher, for us toward or unto Christ.

If you miss the key distinction that this is not about faith vs works but about keeping the Torah (i.e being a Jew) vs faithfulness to Christ you miss the whole thing, which is why you misread Galatians 5:6. You ellipsed out the entire point. It doesn't say "For in Christ Jesus... the only thing that counts is faith working through love". It has two complete thoughts, set one after the other:

"For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any power, but only faith working through love."

What this quite literally means is neither being a Jew nor a Gentile has any power. Which is why he precedes this sentence by sayign - "if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you" and "you who would be justified by the Torah have fallen away from grace." The Torah doesn't justify, it never says it does.

Galatians isn't a faith vs works book. Its a Torah / Jew vs faith book.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Straight from the text of chapter 3, titled By Faith, or works of the law?
I didn't mention chapter 5.

Galatians 3:2-3 ESV
[2] Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? [3] Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?

The Torah isn't a "prison" and you can't put "prison" in quotes because the word isn't in the text.

Galatians 3:22-25 ESV
[22] But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
[23] Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law imprisoneduntil the coming faith would be revealed.
[24] So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith.
[25] But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian

And I'm not sure what "truly right with God" means?

Galatians 3:11-12 ESV
[11] Now it is evident that no one is justified before God by the law, for "The righteous shall live by faith." [12] But the law is not of faith, rather "The one who does them shall live by them."
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Straight from the text of chapter 3, titled By Faith, or works of the law?

that "title" is a translator's helping frame, and isn't part of the original text. But the point remains - the contrast St Paul is drawing is between faith and works of the Law, literally the Torah (nomos in Greek). it's not faith vs works, but works of the Torah.
Quote:

I didn't mention chapter 5.

well, maybe you didn't write that post? but it's in there - you (or someone or something) wrote "* The Lesson: "For in Christ Jesus... the only thing that counts is faith working through love" (Galatians 5:6)."

believe it or not, i have the same bible. so quoting words isn't sufficient to make a case, here.
Quote:

Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?

yes - I will again tell you the framing here is about the gentile Galatians becoming Judaeans - Jewish. Go back a bit, look at Chapter 1 and 2. At St Paul frames it that there is no other gospel, then establishes he didn't receive the gospel from men but Christ directly, and then he picks up an argument with St Peter, where he says "If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?" He didn't say "how could you force faithful people to do good works?" or "do some rituals". But "live like Jews." What describes how to be a Jew, the way of life of the Jews? The Torah, translated into Greek as nomos, Latin as lex, and English as Law. Hence - how can you force Gentiles to follow Torah.

He says - "We ourselves are Jews by birth and not Gentile sinners; yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified." This is the introduction to the whole thing. The punctuation isn't in the original, so it seems to me this "we" is part of the former argument or speech - St John Chrysostom reads it this way. So he (St Paul) continues to Peter - that they are Jews by birth and not gentiles - yet they know that a person is not justified or made righteous by the works of the Torah, because by works of the Torah no one will be made righteous. Why do "we" know that? He includes others in this. We know this because St Paul writes this letter as from himself, not from him and another (like St Timothy). So who is we? The other Jews. And why do "they" know that the works of the Torah don't make you righteous? Because the Torah doesn't say they do, and it never was aimed at that. I'm belaboring this a bit for a couple of reasons.

One, it's in the context immediately preceding the portion you read. Two, it frames the whole argument St Paul is about to make. Three, the verse and chapter breaks and titles of sections aren't part of the original letter, so whatever break the translators and people who put verse and chapter marks thought seemed natural aren't truly part of the text. This is one, continuous letter. We should read it that way.

So immediately after saying that Jews know the Torah doesn't make you righteous, and they know that they were found to be sinners in spite of being both Jewish and keeping the Torah as they worked to be made righteous or justified in Christ. Then St Paul turns to himself - I - he does not nullify the Torah by teaching what he teaches, because righteousness or justification (same word) does not come through the Torah. If it did, Christ would not have needed to die.

Immediately after making this point he is where the quote from you comes in. Where is St Paul talking about faith vs works? Or trusting or some mechanism or whatever? It's not there man, that is a theological debate that came over a thousand years later.

Instead he's saying - when I came with my gospel to you, and you received the Holy Spirit, was it because you heard what I taught or because you followed the Torah? Literally "works of the Torah" or "by hearing with faith". You started with the Spirit, do you now need the flesh? Did God do miracles through you following the Torah? or through you hearing the gospel? Together with the before passages, the point is: if Christ Jesus died to make us righteous, and nowhere in the Torah does it say the Torah can make you righteous, and my gospel didn't require you to become Jewish and follow the Torah...then what are you doing?
Quote:

Galatians 3:22-25 ESV
[22] But the Scripture imprisoned everything under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.
[23] Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law imprisoneduntil the coming faith would be revealed.
[24] So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith.
[25] But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian

Yes? The word "prison" isn't there. It's actually, in my opinion, and extremely misleading translation. The word there translated as "imprisoned" is enclosed, shut up. "Prison" implies like.. a jail, a place where the guilty are kept after they are sentenced. This isn't the sense here. There are words for prison - desmoterion, phulake, but that's not here. Being under watch is common, but the act of jailing is not.

Imprisoned here is a sense of being confined, but the confinement is enclosed, like in a net (this word is used to describe the miraculous catch -- enclosure, same word-- of the fish by the apostles when St Peter is first called). It's not punitive justice, but custody, with a guard set over them. a prison guard is a guard but is very different than a guardian! a guard serving garrison duty isn't a jailer, and neither is a shepherd. This is confirmed by the Law or Torah as our paidagogos, literally the instructor or tutor for children.

There's a sense that patients are "imprisoned" in wards, or students are "imprisoned" in school. And while some schools are prisons, I think that saying "enclosed in a school" or hospital is "imprisoned" is an abuse of the language. And neither sense makes the hospital or school a prison.

The Torah restrained sin by identifying it as sin, kept Israel separate and distinct, and prepared it for Christ. It also limited freedom by restriction. I think the best way to read this is is closer to quarantine or guardianship to contain and deal with the damage of sin, and minimize it, and teach from it, until the problem can be solved. Once Christ came, the tutor is no longer needed.

Quote:

[11] Now it is evident that no one is justified before God by the law, for "The righteous shall live by faith." [12] But the law is not of faith, rather "The one who does them shall live by them."

Yes, I know what St Paul wrote. I don't know what you mean when you say "truly right with God". You wrote:
Quote:

"In Galatians, Paul is writing to people who thought they needed to "add" something to their faith (like following religious laws or rituals) to be truly right with God."

But since I don't know what you mean when you said that, I don't understand exactly what you (or chat GPT as the case may be) is getting at.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.