Predestination vs free will

2,552 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by AgLiving06
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"On the other hand, predestination is a doctrine of assurance for those who are Christians. Once you have accepted the invitation and entered, you can know that God has chosen you and therefore He will not let you go."

I wonder then what happened to Judas? Clearly he was chosen by Christ himself. Walked with Christ for some time and lived in community with the very first apostles. He witnessed miracles, heard the preaching, and was present at the very first Eucharistic event (the last supper).

The same can be said of Thomas, yet he still doubted until he was given a chance to place his hands in the wounds of Jesus resurrected. Then he believed not when he entered.

With all due respect, I don't think predestination means the same thing to me as it does to you.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

"On the other hand, predestination is a doctrine of assurance for those who are Christians. Once you have accepted the invitation and entered, you can know that God has chosen you and therefore He will not let you go."

I wonder then what happened to Judas? Clearly he was chosen by Christ himself. Walked with Christ for some time and lived in community with the very first apostles. He witnessed miracles, heard the preaching, and was present at the very first Eucharistic event (the last supper).

The same can be said of Thomas, yet he still doubted until he was given a chance to place his hands in the wounds of Jesus resurrected. Then he believed not when he entered.

With all due respect, I don't think predestination means the same thing to me as it does to you.

I have thought about Judas and as I said I could be wrong. What is your take on predestination?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is God's well laid out plan for the salvation of man.

Not all will choose this, even some who have been baptized, called, or even ordained. The thief on the cross gives us hope that even up to our last breath we can still choose. God's predestined plan (the primacy of Christ and the primacy of grace) does not negate man's free will.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Forgot to add… Your comment about Jesus not letting you go is true. How that all works out at the time of judgement is something else.

I believe this is where purgatory makes sense. What clouded some good peoples eyes preventing them for freely choosing God, maybe because of bad examples, is now more clear- the beatific vision. Only God knows our heart and I believe his mercy would win the day and they be allowed to make good before walking the streets of heaven.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

It is God's well laid out plan for the salvation of man.

Not all will choose this, even some who have been baptized, called, or even ordained. The thief on the cross gives us hope that even up to our last breath we can still choose. God's predestined plan (the primacy of Christ and the primacy of grace) does not negate man's free will.

I agree with your definition of predestination. Where we disagree is whether you can lose your salvation after you are truly saved.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chuckd said:

Quote:

On the other hand, predestination is a doctrine of assurance for those who are Christians. Once you have accepted the invitation and entered, you can know that God has chosen you and therefore He will not let you go.

And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed believed were ordained to eternal life. Acts 13:48

Interesting read on read on Acts 13 48

https://redeeminggod.com/bible-theology-topics/acts-1348/
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will read it. Something else that interests me is that Judas was part of the twelve that were commissioned by Christ, sent out in pairs to preach the word and heal the people in Jesus' name.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"whether you can lose your salvation after you are truly saved."

Just so I'm clear, when does this happen for the average person, say a 2 year old baby? Or a 44 year old person living in the jungles of South America where the word of God has not been preached?
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PabloSerna said:

"whether you can lose your salvation after you are truly saved."

Just so I'm clear, when does this happen for the average person, say a 2 year old baby? Or a 44 year old person living in the jungles of South America where the word of God has not been preached?

First of all, I believe in ultimate reconciliation so in both cases, those people are ultimately reconciled to God through the atonement of Christ. I personally do not think God punishes those who either are not old enough or have not heard the Gospel. Of course He could, but He is just, merciful, and loving. And He created them in His image.

Secondly, salvation does not just mean an escape from punishment. It means a changed, more fulfilling life. It is ontological not judicial. Here and now.

The Kingdom of God is here. Now.

What are your beliefs on the situations you mentioned?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Almost posed this question on the Hell thread, but curious your take as I know you love your free will. I am bringing these examples up only since it has been included in my 2026 reading plan so far. I love these examples of God's sovereignty when they show up like this. In Ezra it is seen that God persuades or even overrules the will of those kings in power. First in Ezra 1 with Cyrus and then again in 6 with Darius. How do you reconcile the free will of these individual kings and the sovereignty of God?

In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing: "Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. 3 Whoever is among you of all his people, may his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and rebuild the house of the Lord, the God of Israel he is the God who is in Jerusalem.
- Ezra 1:1-3

And they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with joy, for the Lord had made them joyful and had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, so that he aided them in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel.
-Ezra 6:22

And then Proverbs 21:1 obviously speaks to what happened in Ezra as well.
The king's heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10andBOUNCE said:

Almost posed this question on the Hell thread, but curious your take as I know you love your free will. I am bringing these examples up only since it has been included in my 2026 reading plan so far. I love these examples of God's sovereignty when they show up like this. In Ezra it is seen that God persuades or even overrules the will of those kings in power. First in Ezra 1 with Cyrus and then again in 6 with Darius. How do you reconcile the free will of these individual kings and the sovereignty of God?

In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing: "Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. 3 Whoever is among you of all his people, may his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and rebuild the house of the Lord, the God of Israel he is the God who is in Jerusalem.
- Ezra 1:1-3

And they kept the Feast of Unleavened Bread seven days with joy, for the Lord had made them joyful and had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, so that he aided them in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel.
-Ezra 6:22

And then Proverbs 21:1 obviously speaks to what happened in Ezra as well.
The king's heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will.


I agree completely. But if God is good what is the purpose of pre ordaining people He created to ECT hell? Makes zero sense.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
10andBOUNCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You didn't answer my question. This is not about pre-ordaining people to hell. It is about free will and what are we to do when we have examples of God "stirring up" and "turning the heart" of kings. This must be a blatant violation of human free will.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10andBOUNCE said:

You didn't answer my question. This is not about pre-ordaining people to hell. It is about free will and what are we to do when we have examples of God "stirring up" and "turning the heart" of kings. This must be a blatant violation of human free will.


Can the human refuse the "stirring up"? And if not, how can a human refuse God's desire for them to be saved?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10andBOUNCE said:

You didn't answer my question. This is not about pre-ordaining people to hell. It is about free will and what are we to do when we have examples of God "stirring up" and "turning the heart" of kings. This must be a blatant violation of human free will.


And sorry, but double predestination will always be the number 1 issue of Calvinist theology. Coupled with an ECT hell (meditate on that concept for about half an hour) it is truly horrible. And I do not think BIblical.
If ECT hell exists, it should be preached about 24/7 because that would be the main purpose of life. Avoiding ECT hell. Would easily Trump feeding the poor, taking care of the sick, visiting the prisoner, etc.
None of those would really matter compared to avoiding ECT hell.
And I do not see Jesus, Paul, Peter, or anyone in the NT preaching 24/7 on how to avoid ECT hell.
Maybe it is me.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

dermdoc said:

AgLiving06 said:

So Once Saved, Always saved?

Simply believe once, and then go about your business, since you're now "predestined to persevere?"

Not at all. If you are truly saved, you are changed. My experience is you do not want to sin anymore.

I would say "Once truly saved, always saved".


Ok. Lets test this.

Lets say I believe for 15 years. I don't want to sin anymore.

However, after that I fall into temptation and give into sin and fall away.

Was I never truly saved? I just thought I was saved, but turns out no?

Well, under your belief system, you could fall in or out of faith every day. I don't think Scripture supports that.


That's a non-answer as well as incorrect.

I'm asking about your claims.

How do you address the scenario I gave you, which is a very real scenario for tons and tons of people.

I do not believe they were ever really saved if they truly reject Christ and the Holy Spirit. I know we differ on that. And I could be wrong,

In my own experience, I believe a lot of self professed Christians reject the church and formal religion. They still are emdued with the Spirit and produce fruits.

And can we please keep this civil?


I've kept it civil?

You've made multiple claims or used certain words on here, that lead me to want to understand your position.

So far you've not answered twice. The first time you avoided it all together, the second time, you answered the question you wanted to answer instead of mine.

Again my question is this:

Lets say I believe for 15 years. I don't want to sin anymore.

However, after that I fall into temptation and give into sin and fall away.

Was I never truly saved? I just thought I was saved, but turns out no?

I'm not asking for your opinion of what you think I believe (which was incorrect). I'm not asking about "self-professed Christians [who] reject the church and formal religion."

I'm asking about self-professed Christians who fall away.

To use your terminology, were they "truly saved" for the period they were Christians and later not? Were they never "truly saved?" Something else?

Again, simply trying to understand your positions.



I believe they were never truly saved. And I gave my opinions. Not claims. And said I could be wrong.

Feel like I am in a court room.

Sorry! I've been listening to the Supreme Court cases on transgender sports all day so legal mind right now!

--------
You won't like my response now though.

What you've just articulated is the de facto Calvinistic response to salvation. That's why I was trying to give you as many outs as possible.

Only the elect will be saved and persevere and those who aren't elect will eventually fall away because they never had the true saving faith. Or said differently, those who persevere in their faith were the elect, and those who don't weren't.




Did you read my post that everyone is offered salvation? And they decide? But once they truly have saving faith and are emdued with the Holy Spirit, I believe there is nothing that can undo that.

I am not an attorney but am friends with a ton.
You are forgiven.

Now docs on the other hand…


I don't actually think a Calvinist would necessarily have a problem with that either.

They would simply say "everybody was offered salvation, but only the elect will persevere."

You're materially in the same spot as a Calvinist in that "only those with "true saving faith" will sustain.
--------
Beyond the theological issues I have with Calvinism, what you describe, and what they similarly describe seems to turn their faith inward.

How do you know you are "truly saved" except to constantly be inwardly judging your actions. When you're in a valley you begin to doubt whether it's saving faith. When at those peaks, another believers baptism because you know it.

----------
This is why I'd argue the historical church and by default Lutheranism has Baptism correct. Baptism isn't tied to our peaks and valleys, but to the promise gave us throughout the scriptures. When your in a valley you cling with all your might to your baptism, and when at a peak you remember the baptism that saves.

Can you fall away? Yes, but that doesn't mean you didn't have true faith. Can you come back? Yes absolutely.

We disagree on once truly saved, always saved. I could be wrong.


Because you've sort of created a "truly saved" definition. From what I can tell, you use a more restrictive definition than I do.

I simply believe all can be saved. That everybody can receive true salvation from God because he offered it to all. That some will reject it either immediately or over time does not discount the true nature of it.

As I think more about it, I think of Matthew 13:

That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat beside the sea. 2 And great crowds gathered about him, so that he got into a boat and sat down. And the whole crowd stood on the beach. 3 And he told them many things in parables, saying: "A sower went out to sow. 4 And as he sowed, some seeds fell along the path, and the birds came and devoured them. 5 Other seeds fell on rocky ground, where they did not have much soil, and immediately they sprang up, since they had no depth of soil, 6 but when the sun rose they were scorched. And since they had no root, they withered away. 7 Other seeds fell among thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked them. 8 Other seeds fell on good soil and produced grain, some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty. 9 He who has ears, let him hear."

"18 "Hear then the parable of the sower: 19 When anyone hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what has been sown in his heart. This is what was sown along the path. 20 As for what was sown on rocky ground, this is the one who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy, 21 yet he has no root in himself, but endures for a while, and when tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately he falls away. 22 As for what was sown among thorns, this is the one who hears the word, but the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and it proves unfruitful. 23 As for what was sown on good soil, this is the one who hears the word and understands it. He indeed bears fruit and yields, in one case a hundredfold, in another sixty, and in another thirty."


From what I understand, you're arguing that the bolded section is not "true grace or salvation" from Christ because they eventually fell away

I would argue you're making a claim and words to what Jesus said. He doesn't discount the bolded group. He doesn't claim their faith was different. In fact, he points out the joy they receive. Yet when challenged or persecuted, they give in and fall away.

It seems then, that you've looked at this category and determined they did not have true saving faith/salvation and that's not something that Jesus says. The only distinction he makes is the length of time with which they have faith...not a distinction between those kinds of faith (i.e. saving vs other).
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.