one MEEN Ag said:
Agree to disagree on who is reading personally into scripture here. And in general weighing in on the nuances of what money should go towards the actual church vs what money is frivolous and deserves to be sacrificed to the infinite need of 'for the poor.'
I've heard, 'money should be used for the poor' instead of everything under the sun that the church has ever bought across every church I've been a part of. Its an eye rolling argument because at the end of the day, if you have food and clothing and shelter you've got enough to come participate like anyone else in the services of the church. The first priority of the church isn't to ensure financial prosperity of the at large community. Every line item on a church budget can be squeezed harder to divert money to the poor until there is nothing left of the church.
Some guy donated the money for the show. Good for him. Do I think the show is the best edification of Jesus? No. Do I believe in the once saved always saved/heavy emphasis on rededication that protestant evangelical churches push that this type of spectacle reinforces? No. Do I think God considers this action as evil as the Israelites in the full depth of hypocrisy about sacrifices that you bring up? No. Do I think this guy is doing some mortal sin here by this? No.
So it just get chalked up to another case of trying to police how someone else spends their money.
You seem very hostile and seem to be taking things in ways that I am not saying them.
I think it would be best for you if I just choose not to continue the conversation.
I was just simply asking questions (and openly saying I don't know the situation) and you seem to take everything as an attack.
I don't know your personal situation and maybe this is some cross you've had to bear within your church and you have a different perspective than me on "the poor" that gets you going.
I'm not looking to have an argument man. Just a discussion.
This is a discussion forum.