SSPX Announces Names of future bishops, including one American.

1,932 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by 747Ag
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This morning, the FSSPX announced the names of the four priests to be elevated to the episcopacy on July 1, 2026. Included are two French nationals, a Swiss, and an American. I can't say I know a tremendous amount of most of them, however I have been very blessed to have crossed paths with Fr Goldade on a few occasions, and to know some of his family quite well. He is a remarkable priest and I'm sure will be a worthy bishop of the Catholic Church.

The following are the names, home countries, and a short biography.

Fr. Pascal Schrieber, Switzerland
At 53 years of age, Father Pascal Schreiber was born into a Catholic family of five children originating from the canton of Aargau, Switzerland. In 1992, he entered the Herz Jesu Seminary in Zaitzkofen, Germany, before continuing his studies at cne, Switzerland, where he received priestly ordination in the summer of 1998. After five years of ministry in Germany and French-speaking Switzerland, he was entrusted in 2003 with the direction of a boys' secondary school in Mels, in German-speaking Switzerland. Two years later, he assumed responsibility for the girls' primary and secondary school in Wil, a ministry he exercised for nine years. Called in 2014 to Rickenbach, at the headquarters of the Swiss District, he first served there for two years as bursar before being appointed District Superior. Since August 15, 2020, he has been Rector of the Herz Jesu Seminary in Zaitzkofen, Germany, where he devotes himself to the formation of more than fifty future priests and brothers from sixteen countries. He speaks fluent German and French, and also speaks English.

Fr. Michael Goldade, United States
Originally from North Dakota and raised in St. Marys, Kansas, United States, Father Michael Goldade comes from a Catholic family of ten children, including three Sisters of the Society of Saint Pius X. At the age of eighteen, he entered the seminary in Winona, where he was ordained priest in 2004. He exercised his ministry in Armada, Michigan, for five years before being called to direct the retreat house in Ridgefield. In 2014, he was appointed Prior in Kansas City, where he oversaw both the priory, a large parish, a school, and a community of religious sisters. Added to these responsibilities, in 2021, was the office of assistant to the District Superior. Appointed in the summer of 2023 as Rector of Saint Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Virginia, he now oversees the formation of nearly one hundred seminarians. Aged 45, he speaks English, has studied French, and also possesses some knowledge of Spanish.

Fr. Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, France
A French national and born into a Catholic family of seven children, Father Michel Poinsinet de Sivry is 42 years old. He completed his priestly formation at the Seminary of Flavigny in France and then at cne, where he received priestly ordination in 2008. Beginning his ministry at Saint Joseph des Carmes School in southern France, he was entrusted in 2011 with the direction of Saint Louis Primary School in Paris. He fulfilled this office for five years while also serving a chapel in Seine-Saint-Denis and participating in the apostolate of Saint Nicolas du Chardonnet Church in Paris. He subsequently directed the Saint Jean-Baptiste de La Salle secondary school in Camblain-l'Abb, near Arras, for six years before being appointed Superior of the Benelux District in 2022, a position he still holds today. Besides French, he also speaks English and continues the study of German and Dutch.

Fr. Marc Hanappier
Father Marc Hanappier, a French national, was born in 1990 into a Catholic family of ten children blessed with several vocations: one of his brothers is a priest of the Society, another is a priest among the Capuchins of Morgon, and one of his sisters is a Dominican teaching sister of Saint-Pr. Formed at the seminaries of Flavigny and cne, he received priestly ordination in 2013. He began his ministry in France in education, first at the toile du Matin School near *****e, and later at Saint Michael's School near Chteauroux. In 2020, having been appointed professor at the seminary in Dillwyn, Virginia, he first spent a year in Scotland perfecting his command of English while also assisting in parish ministry. At the seminary, he principally teaches metaphysics and dogmatic theology, while also exercising pastoral ministry on Sundays in several chapels. He speaks fluent French and English, has studied German, and has also acquired a knowledge of Spanish.

More informant could be found at https://econe2026.ch/eveques or https://sspx.org/en
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like SSPx heretics need to bend the knee instead of going against their holy father.
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heretics? In what way?
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is all very sad, but everyone knew it was coming. No matter how many concessions the Vatican has made to this Order, they simply cannot embrace all the teachings of our Holy Church. Once again, they will suffer excommunication and separation from the church Christ founded on Earth.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

This is all very sad, but everyone knew it was coming. No matter how many concessions the Vatican has made to this Order, they simply cannot embrace all the teachings of our Holy Church. Once again, they will suffer excommunication and separation from the church Christ founded on Earth.

What teachings of Holy Church do they not embrace?
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
747Ag said:

fc2112 said:

This is all very sad, but everyone knew it was coming. No matter how many concessions the Vatican has made to this Order, they simply cannot embrace all the teachings of our Holy Church. Once again, they will suffer excommunication and separation from the church Christ founded on Earth.

What teachings of Holy Church do they not embrace?

If you are blind, I can't convince you what something looks like.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

747Ag said:

fc2112 said:

This is all very sad, but everyone knew it was coming. No matter how many concessions the Vatican has made to this Order, they simply cannot embrace all the teachings of our Holy Church. Once again, they will suffer excommunication and separation from the church Christ founded on Earth.

What teachings of Holy Church do they not embrace?

If you are blind, I can't convince you what something looks like.

I see (pun intended). A serious allegation has been made with nothing to back it up. Just a "if you don't know, I'm not telling you" sort of missive.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seriously, if you cannot see the rejection of church teaching, it's because you will never allow yourself to see it. So why argue? The Vicar of Christ will have the final word.
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Vicar of Christ himself does not accuse the Priestly Society of heresy. Literally no one has accused them of heresy. The debate is over an accusation of schism. Of course, from many perspectives it doesn't seem as though they actually commit schism (and they 100% do not intend to), but that's where the debate is.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I did not say heresy - I too think that is too strong. But rejecting of church teaching - well, the whole Order is built on rejecting a number of encyclicals.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fc2112 said:

I did not say heresy - I too think that is too strong. But rejecting of church teaching - well, the whole Order is built on rejecting a number of encyclicals.

If it's so obvious, help a brother out by providing an example.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As an aside, just to point out as the detractors have indicated... the conflict isn't about the Liturgy but doctrine and supposed/alleged changes to it. The Liturgy is but a symbol of this deeper conflict.
dg77ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The superior general of the FSSPX cannot validly elevate anyone to the episcopacy. They risk automatic excommunication. They know this, yet they are willing to proceed anyway. Very troubling. If they think the church is not following the Holy Spirit, the Spirit promised to guide us in all things, it would be better for them to unite their suffering to the Cross of Christ which we all know has value in changing the church. There are two many examples in the history of the church where suffering united to Christ's passion changed the direction of the church, and sadly we also have to many examples where man's impatience divided the church.
TeddyAg0422
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, very well said
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:

This is all very sad, but everyone knew it was coming. No matter how many concessions the Vatican has made to this Order, they simply cannot embrace all the teachings of our Holy Church. Once again, they will suffer excommunication and separation from the church Christ founded on Earth.

It is hard to take you seriously when you've been claiming they're already in a state of schism.
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dg77ag said:

The superior general of the FSSPX cannot validly elevate anyone to the episcopacy. They risk automatic excommunication. They know this, yet they are willing to proceed anyway. Very troubling. If they think the church is not following the Holy Spirit, the Spirit promised to guide us in all things, it would be better for them to unite their suffering to the Cross of Christ which we all know has value in changing the church. There are two many examples in the history of the church where suffering united to Christ's passion changed the direction of the church, and sadly we also have to many examples where man's impatience divided the church.

Not everything that is happening now will be viewed the same way in the future.

Pope St John Paul II himself disobeyed a direct Vatican interdict not to consecrate new bishops, and did so anyway, with his reason being the good of the church back when he was Cdl Wojtyla during the Cold War.

St. Joan of Arc was excommunicated while she was executed for being a heretic, and wasn't canonized until almost 500 years late.

St Athanasius was heavily persecuted for daring to stand up to the heresy of Arianism, he was exiled 5 times and banished for 17 years.

The book is not closed on how the Church will ultimately remember the SSPX. Anecdotally, with heavy personal bias, when I look at what is "right" with the Church, I see a praxis that most closely resembles the SSPX, their clergy and their laity. When I see what is "wrong" with the Church I see a praxis that most resembles the most progressive wings of the post-Conciliar church, their clergy and their laity.

There's something to be said for that.

DISCLAIMER: I am against the canonization of these Bishops at this moment.
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dg77ag said:

The superior general of the FSSPX cannot validly elevate anyone to the episcopacy. They risk automatic excommunication. They know this, yet they are willing to proceed anyway. Very troubling. If they think the church is not following the Holy Spirit, the Spirit promised to guide us in all things, it would be better for them to unite their suffering to the Cross of Christ which we all know has value in changing the church. There are two many examples in the history of the church where suffering united to Christ's passion changed the direction of the church, and sadly we also have to many examples where man's impatience divided the church.

This is pretty close to my take, except I think you give the Holy Spirit too much credit. I prefer Pope Benedict XVI's comments on the mechanisms of the holy spirit, where the Church retains full autonomy, the Holy Spirit is just there to make sure that it doesn't go completely off the rails. As you know from our history we've been "off the rails" a few times, if not "completely off the rails".

I think it possible for the Holy Spirit work through those that have been excommunicated. Again, it's a time out, a punishment, not a total and eternal severing. Origen is one of the the greatest of our early church fathers and theologians and he was excommunicated and branded a heretic.
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While it is true that the Superior General cannot validly elevate someone to the episcopacy, this is because he himself is not a bishop. He is a priest. Fr David's Pagliarini. Now, there is no debate that either of the two bishops (Bp. Fellay and Bp. De Galarreta) could validly consecrate bishops. The concern is licity, not validity. Their argument is that there is a state of necessity, which many (including myself, obviously) find very compelling, and that they are only doing the minimum to survive the crisis and NOT create a parallel hierarchy. For example they do not pretend to assume jurisdiction nor elect their own pope nor consecrate as many bishops as they find "convenient." There are historical precedents for similar and related situations. These times are confusing, it's no wonder good and faithful Catholics are going to understand things differently and disagree, but we should at least strive to discuss these topics in charity and not throw out demonstrably false accusations.

Thanks and God bless
dg77ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for your response and correction.
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Their argument is that there is a state of necessity, which many (including myself, obviously) find very compelling, and that they are only doing the minimum to survive the crisis

Anyone who believes this argument is lying to themselves. This argument is incredibly laughable, to be frank, and it's simply an excuse. There is no crisis and there is no necessity for the illicit consecration of bishops. The fact that you don't like the results of Vatican II does not mean that you get to create your own bishops. I am an extremely Tradional Catholic, but what the SSPX is doing is gravely wrong. I believe that their members should be excommunicated for their own good so that they may see the error of their ways and repent for their disobedience and for the divisiveness they sow.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would they openly defy Pope on this after a clear warning from the Vatican?
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good and faithful Catholic here- what is the number one reason they are acting without Vatican approval? Is it age? I read that the Bishops (the one's you listed) are quite old. Otherwise, just operate within the Church and wait for the Vatican to send you a bishop.

ETA: This reminds me of the situation in China years ago, where the Chinese government would send a list of names to the Vatican for the Pope to pick one to be elevated to a Bishop. It doesn't work that way, but maybe THAT was the only way for the Catholic Church to continue in China at that time?
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PabloSerna said:

Why would they openly defy Pope on this after a clear warning from the Vatican?


The same reason Cdl Wojtyla did. The supreme law.
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Vox Clamantis said:

PabloSerna said:

Why would they openly defy Pope on this after a clear warning from the Vatican?


The same reason Cdl Wojtyla did. The supreme law.
And Cardinal Slipyj too
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Marksman said:

Quote:

Their argument is that there is a state of necessity, which many (including myself, obviously) find very compelling, and that they are only doing the minimum to survive the crisis

Anyone who believes this argument is lying to themselves. This argument is incredibly laughable, to be frank, and it's simply an excuse. There is no crisis and there is no necessity for the illicit consecration of bishops. The fact that you don't like the results of Vatican II does not mean that you get to create your own bishops. I am an extremely Traditional Catholic, but what the SSPX is doing is gravely wrong. I believe that their members should be excommunicated for their own good so that they may see the error of their ways and repent for their disobedience and for the divisiveness they sow.
The alleged novelties from Vatican II are a blip on the radar for them. Below is a story that illustrates not all is hunky dory with the human element of Holy Church. Note the cited priest is FSSP. And things have continued down the same path since the Age of Aquarius ended... but like the author of this post states at the end, whether you think this what has followed is sufficient or not is up to you. Personally, I do. And I do believe that there are canonical grounds to disobey the Pope under certain circumstances (SSPX has outlined it elsewhere).



Nota Bene... I attend a diocesan TLM.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It not the first time some group has rationalized their way into this situation.
SoulSlaveAG2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I honestly have no idea what's going on here. 747- we may need to do a virtual beer and discussion summit so you can edumacate me
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey Pablo, I appreciate your question, and I apologize in advance for the TLDR. I can not claim to speak for the FSSPX so take my response with a grain of salt. There are many factors, many of which overlap, and so that makes it difficult to say which would be "the number one reason." Obviously, the age does play a factor, because if they were much younger they could continue to "wait around," so to speak, to continue trying to work something with the Vatican before coming to this decision. I would note that there is no intention to *stop* working with the Vatican after the consecrations on the part of the SSPX, but this gives them the ability to continue administering to the faithful. I understand how that seems counterproductive, and I am sympathetic to that point of view, but I would say "desperate times… desperate measures." These two bishops travel the world constantly to ordain priests, administer confirmation, etc. That is extraordinarily difficult on anyone, but especially the aged and not in good health. Two of the bishops consecrated in 1988 died just in the past year or two. You could summarize the reasoning by appealing to the "crisis in the Church" argument, but that requires lengthy discussions of its own to parse through specifics. I can give a few examples of that some would point to, but these are just off the dome, not comprehensive, and may not even be the best examples.

Recently, a female "bishop" giving blessings in the Vatican. What are Catholics to make of it? Some would say it appears to be a tacit, if not explicit, approval of her so called "ministry." Traditionally, the Church would condemn any pretenders, but especially such extreme heretics and they certainly wouldn't allow them to operate inside of a Church.

There have been scandals regarding participation in false religions. You could look at the Pachamama scandal for example. But even if we consider that one as blown out of proportion, the Assisi meeting itself seemed as some false ecumenism.

I believe it was Amoris Laetitia that permitted not only blessings to couples of divorce and remarriage (what would traditionally be seen as adultery) but also to receive the sacraments. Traditionally, *unrepentant* public sinners were barred from the sacraments.

Further, look at the German "synodal way" and what that has lead to. I believe they just voted to ordain women as deacons (fact check me on that, but that's my understanding). This is something the Church has always condemned as impossible.

On a personal note, I have known at least 1 but I believe it was 2 or 3 priests who have told me things in confession that were explicitly contradicting the Churches teaching. I won't go into details on that, and I also don't necessarily expect you to "take my word for it" but it is relevant to me. I have never met an SSPX priest that would encourage or even permit certain things that they were.

You could even look at the vocations crisis.

Finally, a major point for me, is that the FSSP was promised bishops in 1988. It has been almost 40 years and they still have not been given a bishop. Same with the ICKSP and every other "Ecclesia Dei" group.

When the laity see these things, what can they do but look to priests that hold to the orthodox Catholic faith?

Why are the bishops of the FSSPX acting to consecrate bishops now? Well, they are getting old. They seek only to do the "bare minimum" of what is necessary to preserve the tradition of the faith. That is why they are only consecrating 4 auxiliary bishops, although it would be much more convenient to consecrate 8, 10, 12, etc. Ask an SSPX priest in San Antonio who the bishop is and they will tell you "Abp. Gustavo of course." I recently attended a catechism class in Kansas and the SSPX brother made a major point of this. The bishops of the SSPX hold no juridical authority.

Sorry for the TLDR. These are just some of my thoughts, not necessarily representative of the SSPX. If you want to hear from them there are some excellent articles, books, and podcast series that explain things from their point of view in much greater detail including canon law, the crisis, other examples of this kind of thing in happening in Church history, the response, the intention, etc. Let me know if you'd like me to share some and I'd be happy to post a few examples!

God bless you, my friend.
The BQ Jock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Virtual beer and discussion? Count me in, hombre! Lol
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SoulSlaveAG2005 said:

I honestly have no idea what's going on here. 747- we may need to do a virtual beer and discussion summit so you can edumacate me
For realz
SoulSlaveAG2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The BQ Jock said:

Virtual beer and discussion? Count me in, hombre! Lol


We can make it happen. 747 and I used to hang at the pub before he decided to abandon me for a more temperate climate
747Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SoulSlaveAG2005 said:

The BQ Jock said:

Virtual beer and discussion? Count me in, hombre! Lol


We can make it happen. 747 and I used to hang at the pub before he decided to abandon me for a more temperate climate
Then you moved too.
PabloSerna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well thank you for that summary of points. I can think of a response to each and I think we have aired a few out on this board. No need to derail the thread.

I read somewhere, I may be able to find it, written by a fellow who was former SSPX that made a point about the age of the remaining bishops. That Rome had held off ordaining other SSPX priest in order to bring them back into the fold- so to speak, once these bishops passed on.

It would be a way to let it run its course and then have to come home to Rome once the leadership aged out. I can think of a few women religious orders that have gone that way. So that sort of approach is not without precedent.

I wish we could all get along better and focus on the mission. However, I can see for some the mission is what is happening within their own parish and what they see as scandalous in the news. So I get that.

It may be because the religious order I am most familiar with has never split and is incredibly tolerant of so called progressives and conservatives. However, they (Dominicans) make it a point to stay together. That has given us some freedom to express our "study" of scripture and the current events going on in our world. The laity, sisters, nuns, brothers, and friars have insisted on dropping "1st, 2nd, and 3rd Order" from the vocabulary- although some have clung onto it with all they got. We say "Dominican Family."

I can't help but think we suffer in a similar way when we cannot see past the gender of the Archbishop of Canterbury giving a blessing that any person can give. There was no liturgical rite going on there just a prayer and blessing. However, some see it as more than what the Pope emphasized it was "… to work towards overcoming our differences, no matter how intractable they may appear."

God bless you too!
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
747Ag said:

Vox Clamantis said:

PabloSerna said:

Why would they openly defy Pope on this after a clear warning from the Vatican?


The same reason Cdl Wojtyla did. The supreme law.

And Cardinal Slipyj too

it's always the Slavs.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
747Ag said:

Vox Clamantis said:

PabloSerna said:

Why would they openly defy Pope on this after a clear warning from the Vatican?


The same reason Cdl Wojtyla did. The supreme law.

And Cardinal Slipyj too

Y'all keep pointing that out as if it's a "gotcha". But equating the "emergency" of a suppressed Church behind the Iron Curtain to the "emergency" of an Order that has its panties in a wad because a visitor to the Vatican pretended to be an ordained minister is laughable.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.