aggiehawg said:

---

Thanks for posting that. But DOJ really needs to go after that phantom voter generator called ERIC. Sure they are a private non-profit but can sill open a grand jury investigation and subpoena the hell out of them.

---

I'll see if I can find it, but I THINK ERIC is being investigated. I just can't remember who. IF it was DOJ I know we'd know.

I remember reading it about three weeks ago and was in a position where I couldn't share but wanted to. Naturally I forgot.

I'll do what I can to find it.

This is one more item I've been enlightened due to your efforts.

Quote:

---

State Owned / Non Profit - ERIC, Inc.

---

Quote:

---

I'll see if I can find it, but I THINK ERIC is being investigated. I just can't remember who. IF it was DOJ I know we'd know.

I remember reading it about three weeks ago and was in a position where I couldn't share but wanted to. Naturally I forgot.

I'll do what I can to find it.

---

Thank you. That would be much appreciated. Been waiting a long time for ERIC to be disbanded and go away for good.

Quote:

---

https://duckduckgo.com/?origin=funnel_home_bing&t=h_&q=Investigation+of+State+owned+NON-PROFIT+ERIC&ia=web&assist=true

---

Looking back on my memory, I believe several states withdrawing from ERIC MAY have been the topic I was remembering.

This link may help some.

I'll chat with my congressman this afternoon on the way home. Sounds like I know the man, I don't. They've been pretty cordial since I've moved to my new address in FW.

Quote:

---

Looking back on my memory, I believe several states withdrawing from ERIC MAY have been the topic I was remembering.

---

That is certainly helpful but not dispositive as ERIC still has the voter rolls from those withdrawing states. So their ability to disseminate that info to whomever with bad intentions is eliminated.

Ex-C.I.A. Chief Asks to Keep Justice Dept. From Steering Case to Favored Judge

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/us/politics/trump-doj-investigation-judge-cannon-brennan-cia.html

John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director, sought on Monday to prevent the Justice Department from steering a sprawling investigation into political adversaries of President Trump to a judge in Florida who issued rulings favorable to Mr. Trump during his classified documents case.

The request, addressed to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, was extraordinary. It would be highly unusual for a chief judge to block a colleague from overseeing an investigation. But a lawyer for Mr. Brennan argued that under the circumstances, she had the authority and a duty to do so.

will25u said:

---

Ex-C.I.A. Chief Asks to Keep Justice Dept. From Steering Case to Favored Judge

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/us/politics/trump-doj-investigation-judge-cannon-brennan-cia.html

John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director, sought on Monday to prevent the Justice Department from steering a sprawling investigation into political adversaries of President Trump to a judge in Florida who issued rulings favorable to Mr. Trump during his classified documents case.

The request, addressed to Chief Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga of the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida, was extraordinary. It would be highly unusual for a chief judge to block a colleague from overseeing an investigation. But a lawyer for Mr. Brennan argued that under the circumstances, she had the authority and a duty to do so.

---

Says alot about how today's system behaves...very very little of it good.

And here is,

We the People v. Dominion Voting Systems

RE: DOMINION EMAILS CONFIRM

Forensic experts testifies under oath that the election system in Gwinnett County, Georgia, Colorado, Michigan and other swing states were remotely accessed from Belgrade, Serbia by Serbian… pic.twitter.com/jYlnagafMz

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) December 23, 2025

Of all the initial claims immediately after the 2020 election, the alleged CIA raid on European company's servers that were remotely accessing the servers was the one I was most skeptical of. It was hard for me to believe that would not have been detected. That particular company was something like Scytyl or similar name, company out of Spain with facilities in Frankfort.

So why would a foreign company remotely be involved in US Presidential elections? How would that even be allowed?

We'll guess what? According to their own website, Scytyl did in fact contract and perform election services in multiple states. In and of itself, not dispositive but I found it very curious that was even allowed.

Your statement that you were very curious that it's allowed suggest that it is. If so, that's staggering.

As usual, I shouldn't be surprised!

I still think you ought to write a book! At least go and teach Kardashian how to pass the Bar!!!

fasthorse05 said:

---

Your statement that you were very curious that it's allowed suggest that it is. If so, that's staggering.

As usual, I shouldn't be surprised!

I still think you ought to write a book! At least go and teach Kardashian how to pass the Bar!!!

---

You would be surprised by all of the weird crap you can find on these companies websites. Took me a full day to explore the Runbeck site and get a firm grasp on what all they did. Basically, Runbeck was one stop shopping for any election office to damn near completely outsource their elections. With zero oversight.

That was quite egregious in Maricopa County. Runbeck touched much more ballots than Maricopa officials did.

Within Brennan's letter there is a link to another letter his lawyers previously sent to John Durham.

Do not miss it. I cannot believe he included this in his outline to the FL court.https://t.co/AMUymar7WY https://t.co/cJWXJjnR6M

— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) December 23, 2025