***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

986,793 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ProgN • 2:33p, 2/1/20
AG
Hirono really should be in a straight jacket in a padded cell. She is certifiably insane!
Reply Quote
8
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:46p, 2/1/20
AG
I think she's sane. Her problem is she's just a moron.
Reply Quote
9
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txagbear • 3:02p, 2/1/20
AG
txagbear said:
And most everyone paying attention would know that if the Dems were over target for a solid reason to impeach Trump, many in the GOP would stand in line to sign up for it.



lol


So what you are saying is this wasn't a solid reason.
Reply Quote
3
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MetoliusAg • 3:05p, 2/1/20
AG
MetoliusAg said:
Aaaand another shoe drops. Gonna need a bigger scorecard to keep track of all the corruption going on with Rudy, Trump, the GOP, and their many grifts.



Oh you were wrong again.
Reply Quote
12
Cartographer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EKUAg • 3:22p, 2/1/20
Send in Tulsi. At least she understands the issues and arguments placed in front of her.
Reply Quote
3
captkirk
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ProgN • 4:09p, 2/1/20
AG
Prognightmare said:
We can't ever let these people gain control again
Reply Quote
8
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 4:26p, 2/1/20
AG
captkirk said:
Prognightmare said:
We can't ever let these people gain control again


Right, the Democrat's media monopoly and poisoned justice system has given them the ability to act with impunity turning them into tyrants. We now know the media will cover for them no matter how blatant the corruption.
Reply Quote
5
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to captkirk • 6:43p, 2/1/20
captkirk said:
Prognightmare said:
We can't ever let these people gain control again



Exactly! Here's a small sample of the dumbasses I encounter regularly.
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ProgN • 7:30p, 2/1/20
I want to actually know what policy Trump has implemented that is so horrible?
Reply Quote
9
redline248
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:33p, 2/1/20
AG
Banning all Muslims and separating immigrant families, duh
Reply Quote
3
houag80
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:00p, 2/1/20
AG
The "slashing" of the three areas that ******* claims......did not happen. Twitter is a cesspool.
Reply Quote
4
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:43p, 2/1/20
Reply Quote
2
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:25a, 2/2/20
AG
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote
Reply Quote
1
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 11:28a, 2/2/20
AG
Proved what case Gary?
Reply Quote
5
aggieforester05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 11:31a, 2/2/20
AG
John Maplethorpe said:
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote


They failed to prove intent was to influence the election. What is so hard to understand about this?

Any president would be justified and obligated when such blatant corruption has been identified.

This would have been a back page story at best if it were a Democrat president.
Reply Quote
7
Agvet12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 11:33a, 2/2/20
AG
John Maplethorpe said:
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote


Maybe if the house did a better job in presenting facts, the witnesses used in the sham would've been more reliable. But y'all went with "mah feelings" instead of facts. Sucks to suck loser. Enjoy 5 more years.
Reply Quote
3
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 12:01p, 2/2/20
AG
You lost Gary. All three of your usernames lost.
Reply Quote
15
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to backintexas2013 • 12:04p, 2/2/20
AG
I guess that means he's wrong, wrong, and wrong.
Reply Quote
1
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggieforester05 • 12:29p, 2/2/20
AG
aggieforester05 said:
John Maplethorpe said:
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote


They failed to prove intent was to influence the election. What is so hard to understand about this?



The managers proved the case even with the unprecedented cover up ongoing. Republicans just wanted it over with. "Not impeach/remove worthy" is the only honest defense.

Is anybody but Trump saying "no QPQ" anymore? They all know he lied.
Reply Quote
2 edits
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:37p, 2/2/20
AG
Sorry Gary but the house managers proved nothing but their incompetence, but you already knew that.
Reply Quote
8
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:46p, 2/2/20
AG


Perfect call. Nothing wrong. But don't do it again.
Reply Quote
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 12:48p, 2/2/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
Sorry Gary but the house managers proved nothing but Trump's absolute hilarious guilt according to Republican jurors, they just don't want to remove him.


FIFY
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 12:50p, 2/2/20
AG
Yep, changing posts is the only way you can win. Congrats
Reply Quote
8
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 12:53p, 2/2/20
AG
Rockdoc said:
Yep, fixing my posts is the only way they'll make any sense.


You're welcome.

Poopslap bet Bolton's book confirms Trump has been lying?
Reply Quote
Zombie Jon Snow
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggieforester05 • 12:54p, 2/2/20
AG
aggieforester05 said:
John Maplethorpe said:
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote


They failed to prove intent was to influence the election. What is so hard to understand about this?

Any president would be justified and obligated when such blatant corruption has been identified.

This would have been a back page story at best if it were a Democrat president.

Yep. Here's how it plays out with Obama much like his many controversies:


Press: Mr. President we understand you withheld aid from Ukraine and asked them to also investigate possible political corruption there.... can you tell us about this?

Obama: Yes I withheld the aid so they would investigate possible corruption there, but we are planning to release that aid soon and we look forward to working positively with Ukraine as they investigate these matters that may in fact involve political issues here in the US.

Press: One follow-up do you think this is a conflict of interest for you as it involves a different political party candidate that may run against you?

Obama: No. Thanks, you guys have a great day.



And that would be the end of it.

Reply Quote
11
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 12:55p, 2/2/20
AG
You poopslapping yourself wouldn't be an improvement.
Reply Quote
7
hairloom
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 12:58p, 2/2/20
John Maplethorpe said:
Rockdoc said:
Yep, fixing my posts is the only way they'll make any sense.


You're welcome.

Poopslap bet Bolton's book confirms Trump has been lying?
you've already proven to be John WELCHER maplethorpe. Why would anyone ever trust your Welching ass again? You've been reduced to etcetera and lot Y levels.
Reply Quote
5
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hairloom • 1:07p, 2/2/20
AG
hairloom said:
John Maplethorpe said:
Rockdoc said:
Yep, fixing my posts is the only way they'll make any sense.


You're welcome.

Poopslap bet Bolton's book confirms Trump has been lying?
you've already proven to be John WELCHER maplethorpe. Why would anyone ever trust your Welching ass again?


Link? This did not happen.

The bet in question was contingent on witnesses. The Senate vote on impeachment hasn't even happened either.

Reply Quote
lobopride
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:14p, 2/2/20
Schiff got owned so hard with that response by Sekulow that Democrats were getting excited that slavery was coming back.
Reply Quote
1
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:17p, 2/2/20


DO IT (gif)
Reply Quote
3
4stringAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 1:18p, 2/2/20
AG
John Maplethorpe said:
Rockdoc said:
Yep, fixing my posts is the only way they'll make any sense.


You're welcome.

Poopslap bet Bolton's book confirms Trump has been lying?


And why is Bolton to be taken at his word? He's trying to sell a book and suckers with TDS will gobble it right up.
Reply Quote
8
1 edit
John Maplethorpe
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4stringAg • 1:26p, 2/2/20
AG
Quote:
And why is Bolton to be taken at his word? He's trying to sell a book and suckers with TDS will gobble it right up


We don't have to take him at his word. He can be cross examined, he has contemporary notes and documents, corroborating testimony from other witnesses, the complaint reported to NSA lawyers, etc...

It's laughable at this point that anybody would believe Trump. Nobody will back up his version under oath.
Reply Quote
Agvet12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4stringAg • 1:26p, 2/2/20
AG
It still won't directly implicate anything lol the substance isn't worth the hype.

Isn't the same guy who made a 100$ bet that trump would be removed and still hasn't paid up? Lol
Reply Quote
5
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to John Maplethorpe • 1:30p, 2/2/20
John Maplethorpe said:
Lamar Alexander's take:

Quote:
I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven and that does not meet the United States Constitution's high bar for an impeachable offense.....

There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a 'mountain of overwhelming evidence.'


TLDR: He's obviously guilty. The managers proved the case, more witnesses would just be beating a dead horse. I just don't think it merits removal from office.

https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2020/1/alexander-statement-on-impeachment-witness-vote
That's all you have left?

One senator in a purple state hedging his bets a bit?

That's what you are going to hang your hat on?

You poor, poor thing.
Reply Quote
7
Cassius
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to backintexas2013 • 1:34p, 2/2/20
backintexas2013 said:
You lost Gary. All three of your usernames lost.
Reply Quote
6
First Page Last Page
Page 255 of 264 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.