amercer said:

---

The path where you see a gay boogie man around ever corner?

I swear this place has basically turned into a del web with a bunch of cranky old people talking about how it's too dangerous to get your mail after dark because of all the carjackings they see on the 10pm news.

---

Do you want to look at the demographics of major cities and compare them to what they were in 1960 because we can do that? I guarantee that explains 100% of the rise is violent crime.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that gays were your only boogie men.

Staff deleting lies.

amercer said:

---

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that gays were your only boogie men.

---

I only post data and facts, you seem to want to live in denial of reality.

ALL?

Emotional Support Cobra said:

---

milner79 said:

---

"we have a Dean of DEI pushing this stuff."

Elaborate, please.

---

I misspoke. We have a VP of DEI in the academic structure where I work as well as a vice dean.

This is a huge push in academia so not unique. I am here for being welcoming and providing a structured support system for first generation students etc. but the effort has gotten totally out of hand.

---

OK, thanks. I understand you to be saying the DEI vp is pushing inclusion generally. Not that there is a university official actively promoting the Dallas drag queen incident. (The later, were it the case, would really be disturbing.)

Emotional Support Cobra said:

---

My work promoted a family friendly drag event in the "other pride events" category of their Pride parade promotion. Completely sick and such an embarrassment that we have a Dean of DEI pushing this stuff.

---

at what point does a savvy lawyer and employee start pushing sexual harrassment charges on all of these companies focused on pushing this agenda. Discussing anything sexual at work falls directly under the definition of harassment in all of the training I have attended over the years. Please tell me why this behavior does not fit the definition

Ban check

Come on dude. Your sources in that infographic are crap.

1) Graphic about parasite: Post the whole study (FROM 1980)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7437971/

Let me cherry pick some data from 40 years ago.

2) 1/15 homosexuals is a pedophile. Again, an old study (1986), could not find in this archive of the journal:

https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/prxa/59/1

Of course, citing a title and author must have been too daunting a task for the maker of this graphic. If you can find it in the journal listing above, by all means, post.

Let me cite a different source for you with some data that is easy to track:

https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/victim-assistance/jwrc/keep-kids-safe/sexuality-of-offenders/

Quote:

---

Medical data backs up this psychological observation. In a 1994 study, researchers reviewed 352 medical charts, representing all of the children seen in the emergency room or child abuse clinic of a Denver children's hospital as a result of being sexually abused. In looking at charts for a one year period (from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992), the researchers found that the molester was a gay or lesbian adult in fewer than 1 percent of cases (2 of 269) in which the adult molester could be identified. (Jenny, Roesler, and Poyer, 1994).

---

3) Alcoholism. Hey, you got one there. I feel like I need a drink after reading your Facebook grandma infographic.

https://www.alcoholrehabguide.org/resources/lgbtq-alcoholism/

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/overview_2015.pdf

2015, just a little update from 1992. It is the study linked in the graphic



More to come in a second. I'm a big fan of facts. Aren't you?

Quote:

---

I only post data and facts

---

This is the funniest thing I've seen all day.

BlueAg2003 said:

---

Come on dude. Your sources in that infographic are crap.

1) Graphic about parasite: Post the whole study (FROM 1980)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7437971/

Let me cherry pick some data from 40 years ago.

2) 1/15 homosexuals is a pedophile. Again, an old study (1986), could not find in this archive of the journal:

https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/prxa/59/1

Of course, citing a title and author must have been too daunting a task for the maker of this graphic. If you can find it in the journal listing above, by all means, post.

Let me cite a different source for you with some data that is easy to track:

https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/victim-assistance/jwrc/keep-kids-safe/sexuality-of-offenders/

Quote:

---

Medical data backs up this psychological observation. In a 1994 study, researchers reviewed 352 medical charts, representing all of the children seen in the emergency room or child abuse clinic of a Denver children's hospital as a result of being sexually abused. In looking at charts for a one year period (from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992), the researchers found that the molester was a gay or lesbian adult in fewer than 1 percent of cases (2 of 269) in which the adult molester could be identified. (Jenny, Roesler, and Poyer, 1994).

---

3) Alcoholism. Hey, you got one there. I feel like I need a drink after reading your Facebook grandma infographic.

https://www.alcoholrehabguide.org/resources/lgbtq-alcoholism/

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/overview_2015.pdf

2015, just a little update from 1992. It is the study linked in the graphic



More to come in a second. I'm a big fan of facts. Aren't you?

---

I believe it. 1st hand knowledge with a gay relative and his partner

BlueAg2003 said:

---

Quote:

---

I only post data and facts

---

This is the funniest thing I've seen all day.

---

I thought you people liked graphics and such. Huh guess not.

BlueAg2003 said:

---

Come on dude. Your sources in that infographic are crap.

1) Graphic about parasite: Post the whole study (FROM 1980)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7437971/

Let me cherry pick some data from 40 years ago.

2) 1/15 homosexuals is a pedophile. Again, an old study (1986), could not find in this archive of the journal:

https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/prxa/59/1

Of course, citing a title and author must have been too daunting a task for the maker of this graphic. If you can find it in the journal listing above, by all means, post.

Let me cite a different source for you with some data that is easy to track:

https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/victim-assistance/jwrc/keep-kids-safe/sexuality-of-offenders/

Quote:

---

Medical data backs up this psychological observation. In a 1994 study, researchers reviewed 352 medical charts, representing all of the children seen in the emergency room or child abuse clinic of a Denver children's hospital as a result of being sexually abused. In looking at charts for a one year period (from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992), the researchers found that the molester was a gay or lesbian adult in fewer than 1 percent of cases (2 of 269) in which the adult molester could be identified. (Jenny, Roesler, and Poyer, 1994).

---

3) Alcoholism. Hey, you got one there. I feel like I need a drink after reading your Facebook grandma infographic.

https://www.alcoholrehabguide.org/resources/lgbtq-alcoholism/

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/overview_2015.pdf

2015, just a little update from 1992. It is the study linked in the graphic



More to come in a second. I'm a big fan of facts. Aren't you?

---

the one I didn't buy was 51 percent of all domestic abuse cases are homosexuals
I cannot see how that is statistically possible

amercer said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

On top of that. I just typed "drag queen story hour" in Google.

And searched seven pages of headlines. Over two months worth of stories. Not one report of abuse towards kids.

Clean your own house.

---

Imagine that, the media covering up abuse. We have never seen this before!

---

Don't talk about the baptists that way!

---

No one in this board condones those actions of a few... well a few on this board have relished in it in their failed attempt to score gotcha points.

4) Graphic on average number of sexual partners

A link to your study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6243391/

Full text cannot be found as it is old.

Here is an article on data from 3 representative studies, including one with a dataset of 12,000 people. But I'm sure yours had 12,000 too, right?

https://medium.com/@neuropsychology/gay-promiscuity-statistics-partners-45fc370c0ca5

A far cry from a lifetime average of 1,000.

A 1994 study in the United States, which looked at the number of sexual partners in a lifetime, found 20% of heterosexual men had one partner, 55% had two to 20 partners, and 25% had more than 20 sexual partners.

Seidman, S. N.; Rieder, R. O. (1994). "A review of sexual behavior in the United States"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7619092/


5)Graphic on experiencing abuse

Hey! A study from this millennium!

https://openpsychologyjournal.com/contents/volumes/V3/TOPSYJ-3-36/TOPSYJ-3-36.pdf

A more recent study says the following (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3134495/)

Quote:

---

Studies revealed high rates of sexual abuse among bisexual female, lesbian, bisexual male, gay male, and heterosexual female adolescents (40%, 32%, 24%, 21%, and 17%, respectively), compared with 5% of heterosexual male adolescents reporting having been sexually abused.

---

The group experiencing the highest incidents is bisexual women.


https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2789482

The above study states 30% of LGBT individuals report childhood/adolescent sexual abuse compared to 13% reported by straight individuals.

This study says that was most likely committed by a relative's heterosexual male partner. In fact the chances are over 100 times greater than being assaulted by someone who identifies as LGBT.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8008535/

Jenny, C., Roesler, T.A., & Poyer, K.L. (1994) re Children at Risk For Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?" Pediatrics Vol. 94, No. 1, 41-44.

6) Graphic on 2% of the population making up 33% of pedophile rapists

The link posted: https://archive.ph/sX8zg

The ol' peer reviewed journal, the American Family Association. Oh wait...sorry, not peer reviewed, nor a journal.

Quote:

---

The Journal of Sex & Married Therapy, in a study of male sex offenders against children, found that one-third of the offenders directed their sexual activity against males. And the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children.

This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population.

---

This a a quote from the article without a single citation, title of the studies, or authors. If he's talking about any of the Cameron studies, please feel free to read about how he tried to draw conclusions based on a sample set of a whopping 17 people. He has been discredited time and time again by major research organizations. If these folks had solid evidence in the form of research, why not cite the journals? Why would this information not be easily found all over the internet? Strange. I would think they'd be proud to showcase such groundbreaking work.

You aren't going to like this research study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3310141/

Blanchard explains: "The key comparisons produced results similar to those of Freund et al. They show that gay men (homosexual teleiophiles) and straight men (heterosexual teleiophiles) have similar penile responses to depictions of children in the laboratory," that is to say, relatively lowbut more important than their being relatively low, they're not really any different for gay and straight men.

Furthermore, "The responses of heterosexual teleiophiles to prepubescent girls were similar to the responses of homosexual teleiophiles to prepubescent boys (gold bar in top left panel vs. green bar in top right panel). The difference between these means was not statistically significant. The responses of heterosexual teleiophiles to pubescent girls were actually slightly higher than the responses of homosexual teleiophiles to pubescent boys (orange bar in top left panel vs. blue bar in top right panel). This difference was statistically significant; however, it is most likely trivial, because the heterosexual teleiophiles were generally a little more responsive than the homosexual teleiophiles." So it doesn't look like gay men are any more likely than straight men to be attracted to pubescent children.

Finally, "The middle panels and bottoms panels of the figure show that the stimuli depicting pubescent and prepubescent boys and girls worked as they should. The subjects who responded most to those stimulus categories responded as much or more, in absolute terms, as the subjects who responded most to adult men and women." In other words, we have reason to believe that this testing method is giving us real data when we use it to conclude that gay men are no more likely to be sexually interested in children than straight men are.


96% of child sexual abusers are men. 77% of them are married men. 93% described themselves as religious.

https://www.bishop-accountability.org/specialtopics/abuse-data/2002-04-Abel-Harlow-Child.pdf

61% of children are molested in their own home. 93% of children know their abuser. Fewer than 7% are committed by strangers. If only 2% of the population is gay (and let's say half of that is gay men...we know lesbians aren't committing much childhood sexual abuse)....there is some serious mathing that needs to be done. Numbers would indicate this is mostly being perpetrated by heterosexual males.

7) The graphic on 78% of individuals having an STD

Comes from this book from 1986, the contents of which I cannot find ANYWHERE:

https://www.amazon.com/Homosexual-Network-Private-Public-Policy/dp/0815957149

His only other book is entitled Gay, AIDS, and You. I'm sure it is very scientific. He is such a prolific writer and acclaimed researcher that his information CANNOT be found online. There is no actual research citation for this stat.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3575167/#:~:text=Self%2Dreported%20STI%20rates%20were,significantly%20differ%20from%20heterosexual%2DWSM.

Quote:

---

There was no statistically significant difference in heterosexual-MSW and gay-MSM's odds of reporting an STI.

---

A 2008 study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2377304/

Self-reported viral STD rates were significantly higher among bisexual women (15.0% to 17.2%) than among lesbians (2.3% to 6.7%).

A 2018 study: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304751

Quote:

---

Results.

---

Quote:

---

Among those who were HIV-negative at baseline (n = 16 757), 29% tested positive for any STI during the study period, compared with 38% of people living with HIV. Stratified by birth sex, STI positivity was 32% among men and 11% among women. By SOGI, STI positivity was 35% among gay and bisexual cisgender men, 15% among heterosexual cisgender men, 11% among cisgender women, 25% among transgender women, 13% among gay and bisexual transgender men, 3% among heterosexual transgender men, and 26% among nonbinary people.

---

78% is just an insanely stupid number to even claim.

8) 23% of children with lesbian parents have been sexually abused

BY WHO? The lesbians?

Your link: https://archive.ph/5UPbM

Lifesite...a completely unbiased scientific website. https://www.lifesitenews.com/

The 2012 "study" by Mark Regnerus, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Austin has been discredited by his peers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study

Quote:

---

The study was met with considerable criticism from many academics[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-cbs-1][1][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-letter-4][4][/url] and scholarly organizations.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-brief-5][5][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-6][6][/url] Most notably, only two children in the study had actually lived with homosexually partnered parents for their entire childhoods. Many of the non-heterosexual parents were in previous heterosexual marriages, and had then gone on to be in a same-sex relationship at some point. Regnerus removed the effects of divorce, infidelity, single parenthood from his heterosexual control group, but not from the gay parent group. Thus, negative outcomes could be attributed to family disruption and divorce, as opposed to homosexual parenting. More importantly, large studies of twins separated at birth and raised in different environments found that they grew up to be just as similar as those raised together, and large adoption studies found that adopted children correlated with their biological parents for genetic reasons, not their adoptive parents. Thus, parents tend to have limited environmental effects on their children's behavior, and negative outcomes very likely correlate with shared genes between parents and children. A 2015 reanalysis raised serious questions about the validity of the study, suggesting misclassification of families, inconsistency in answers suggesting mischief, and evidence many respondents did not live with their non-heterosexual parents. When these cases were excluded the differences largely vanished.

---

Why manipulate data?? Hmm.

Quote:

---

In July 2012, over 150 scientists wrote a letter to the editor of Social Science Research criticizing the study and raising concerns about the journal's peer review process.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-letter-4][4][/url]

In the November 2012 issue of the journal, an audit was published by Darren Sherkat of Southern Illinois University regarding the peer-review process with respect to the Regnerus study (as well as another study from the same issue). The audit concluded that the peer-review process failed in these instances because of "both ideology and inattention" by the reviewers; he added that of the six reviewers, three of them were on record as opposing same-sex marriage.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-22][22][/url] Sherkat also dismissed the study as "bull****" in an interview and argued that its definition of gay fathers and lesbian mothers should have "disqualified it immediately" from being considered for publication.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-23][23][/url]

In August 2013, sociologist Philip N. Cohen wrote on his blog that Wright relied on paid consultants to review the paper and failed to disclose this when the study was first published. He also called for the paper to be retracted and for Wright to step down.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-24][24][/url]

---

Quote:

---

The first peer-reviewed and published criticism is the Cheng and Powell, 2015 review.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-reassess-25][25][/url] The authors state that they identified a large number of potential measurement errors and other methodological choices which led to erroneous results. They state that even small differences in coding can profoundly shape empirical patterns, and that after repeating the analysis with sound methods, the "differences in being raised by gay/lesbian and heterosexual parents are minimal."[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-reassess-25][25][/url]

---

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26004484/

Quote:

---

The second such peer reviewed criticism is by Stanford University Sociology professor Michael J. Rosenfeld which also brings out the methodological flaws in Regnerus study. It was published in Sociological Science.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Family_Structures_Study#cite_note-reassess1-26][26][/url]

---

https://sociologicalscience.com/download/volume-2/september/SocSci_v2_478to501.pdf


There is not a single other study that even has a statistic of this type. If you remember back to the previous statistic about 96% of abusers being men, that leaves us 4% who are women. Very few of those are lesbians. I don't have an exact number because there really aren't studies out there for it. But you want me to believe, based on a study that has been ripped to shreds, that 23% of kids of lesbians have experienced abuse (again...doesn't say from who...could be their uncle's best friend's bowling buddy...but I know it's suggesting from the lesbian). Doesn't track with the stats out there.

CDUB98 said:

---

Don't need more laws. The law is already there. Indecency with a child.

Arrest them and charge them.

---

Marshall word be good

BallerStaf2003 said:

---

On top of that. I just typed "drag queen story hour" in Google.

And searched seven pages of headlines. Over two months worth of stories. Not one report of abuse towards kids.

Clean your own house.

---

Yeah, guess you aren't going to follow the kids after their formative years.

So if they didn't go gay or ruin themselves in the measly 3week window, I guess it is ok. This is what gays like yourself will never understand. It takes a LOT to raise a child.

You have to be sure not to be too heavy handed, because you don't want them to be an abuser (if they are boys) and you don't want to have to spank your daughter (because you don't want to teach them that it is ok to be hit).

More than that, raising a child is a sacrifice. You sacrifice the amazing life you could be living without them for the greater reward of kisses and hugs from your children. Knowing they are little pieces of you that will continue on in this world after you have left it

So, In your process of self love, while loving who you are as a gay man, don't ever expect to preach to those who gave you life. You exist because of them. They may have held you in their arms and gave you warm kisses to send you to sleep, and put bandaids on your boo-boos.

I'm sad that you can't continue that. It really is what life is all about.

Tanya 93 said:

---

BlueAg2003 said:

---

Come on dude. Your sources in that infographic are crap.

1) Graphic about parasite: Post the whole study (FROM 1980)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7437971/

Let me cherry pick some data from 40 years ago.

2) 1/15 homosexuals is a pedophile. Again, an old study (1986), could not find in this archive of the journal:

https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/prxa/59/1

Of course, citing a title and author must have been too daunting a task for the maker of this graphic. If you can find it in the journal listing above, by all means, post.

Let me cite a different source for you with some data that is easy to track:

https://www.zeroabuseproject.org/victim-assistance/jwrc/keep-kids-safe/sexuality-of-offenders/

Quote:

---

Medical data backs up this psychological observation. In a 1994 study, researchers reviewed 352 medical charts, representing all of the children seen in the emergency room or child abuse clinic of a Denver children's hospital as a result of being sexually abused. In looking at charts for a one year period (from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992), the researchers found that the molester was a gay or lesbian adult in fewer than 1 percent of cases (2 of 269) in which the adult molester could be identified. (Jenny, Roesler, and Poyer, 1994).

---

3) Alcoholism. Hey, you got one there. I feel like I need a drink after reading your Facebook grandma infographic.

https://www.alcoholrehabguide.org/resources/lgbtq-alcoholism/

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/overview_2015.pdf

2015, just a little update from 1992. It is the study linked in the graphic



More to come in a second. I'm a big fan of facts. Aren't you?

---

the one I didn't buy was 51 percent of all domestic abuse cases are homosexuals
I cannot see how that is statistically possible

---

https://vawnet.org/sites/default/files/materials/files/2016-08/ImplicationsforCounseling.pdf

I'm willing to bet the wording should be "51% of same sex couple relationships"

From the above info, I was looking for the 1993 source listed.
(again older and no longer valid unless a study was done by LGBTQ influenced scientists or it supports their position.)

Heterosexual couples 95% of men are the abuser

50% of lesbians reported being a victim of domestic violence by a female partner.
50% also reported being the abuser.

Anecdotal case.
A poster on this thread has reported domestic abuse on these forums.



Don't bother posting any stats - they will ALWAYS be defended and deflected.
All of us straight bigots need to understand the following.

Being gay is virtuous - who you have sex with is the most important guiding factor in life.

No matter what horrible acts are done to children if it is done by LGBTQ+ it will be deflected with - "the Church" and "Republican politicians"

A study is too old unless it is done by a member of the LGBTQ+ community.

Drag shows are an artform and have nothing to do with being gay.

No matter how many examples you show of abhorrent behavior it's always just "some fringe person"

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

amercer said:

---

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that gays were your only boogie men.

---

I only post data and facts, you seem to want to live in denial of reality.

---

Yeah those "facts" are really holding up.

Quote:

---

the one I didn't buy was 51 percent of all domestic abuse cases are homosexuals
I cannot see how that is statistically possible

---

You are correct. A completely bunk stat, but he knows that. Let me get to the final two graphics on there.

The AIDS stat. First, sir, you are disgusting. Does it make you feel like a good person to throw out a disease that has ravaged families and communities as a weapon in your argument?

https://archive.ph/scA5b links to an article from https://www.cnsnews.com/


The article you posted actually does not say that. It says

Quote:

---

The 67% of all new HIV cases is for 2013 and the 54% living with HIV is for 2011, the latest years, according to the CDC, for that particular data.

---

So whoever made this can't even accurately quote their source. I'm sure they were very concerned with this 13% discrepancy.

As of 2016, the number remains around 54% of those living with HIV who are gay/bisexual men.

From hiv.gov

Quote:

---

According to the latest estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 34,800 new HIV infections occurred in the United States in 2019.a Annual infections in the U.S. have been reduced by more than two-thirds since the height of the epidemic in the mid-1980s. Further, CDC estimates of annual HIV infections in the United States show hopeful signs of progress in recent years. CDC estimates show new HIV infections declined 8% from 37,800 in 2015 to 34,800 in 2019, after a period of general stability.

Much of this progress was due to larger declines among young gay and bisexual men in recent years. From 2015 to 2019, new infections among young gay and bisexual men (ages 13-24) dropped 33% overall, with declines in young men of all races, but African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos continue to be severely and disproportionately affected.

---

I'm sure you'll be happy to hear that new cases are steeply declining. Again, just a gross stat to throw out there.

And my favorite one. The domestic violence stat. 2% of the population commits 51% of domestic violence? Oh I can't wait to break this one down. If this was true we'd all have. DV rap sheet that's a mile long.

Your source: Newsweek, October 4, 1993

Um. Ok? So do we get the article name or author? Origin of the actual stat? Nope. Ok. Moving on. I guess I could buy it on eBay and have a look:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/313655273668

Quote:

---

In the United States, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics in 1995 women reported a six times greater rate of intimate partner violence than men.[31][32] The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) indicates that in 1998 about 876,340 violent crimes were committed in the U.S. against women by their current or former spouses, or boyfriends.[33]

---

There is little information on perpetrators of DV other than the following:

Quote:

---

Ninety percent of people who commit violent physical assault are men. Males perpetrate 95% of all serious domestic violence.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online. http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/

---

Quote:

---

The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that 95% of reported assaults on spouses or ex-spouses are committed by men against women.

Source: Douglas, H. (1991). Assessing violent couples. Families in Society, 72 (9): 525-535.

---

Now, I will say those are very old stats as it is documented that cases of female on male abuse are on the rise. But again, heterosexual perpetrators…women assaulting men. More stats here:

https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS

https://injepijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40621-019-0182-2

Quote:

---

Current or former male intimate partners commit the majority of homicides of females and fifty to 60 % of these homicides are perpetrated with firearms. Most murder-suicides involve intimate partners and the vast majority of these cases are women murdered by intimate partners using a firearm.

---

Do better next time. At least pull a little accurate research in.

Sorry Groomers!

JUST IN: 5th Circuit will allow Texas to enforce law against minors attending drag shows. Majority: Southwick (GWBush), Engelhardt (Trump). Partial dissent: Dennis (Clinton). Doc: https://t.co/gcOFfEASwR

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) November 6, 2025

Anyone that wants to take their child to a drag show is delusional.