I guess I'll have to watch the footage of what wasn't on the interview to have an informed opinion

Ah, the proverbial spoke too soon! So this is what its about --- things not in the interview but known. I will read the link.

krowe said:

---

Is it not? Same principal as the colorado baker no? Or is it diffeRent

---

Why do you hate black people?

Eso si, Que es said:

---

They like money, just not black peoples money is what I am hearing.

(Am I doing it right Dems.)

---

That's what I'm hearing too. Blacks doing business with JP Morgan should pull all their money out.

Fightin_Aggie said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

Banks that don't like money.

What interesting times.

---

They like money, they like power and control more

---

And, it's now abundantly clear that Chase Bank is a RACIST organization. Cancel Culture Brigade needs to go to work.

It is notable though, that the 10/6/22 episode has been basically censored. This is not trustworthy stuff, and Kanye was certainly dead on right about what the media and Democrats do about "making blacks be a race" rather than looking at them as people. His attempts to explain it might have been clumsy, but he was basically talking aboout the de-facto plantation that the DNC-MSM and even Academia fusion keeps blacks on and which Trump disrupted the messaging of a bit. And what he said about celebrities in general in cases being pressured to tow a line range true.

People are not talking about Jason Whitlock's rather important closing commentary at the last 15 minutes of that Tucker night. He expanded on the above in clearer fashion clearly approving and Whitlock is great.

Kvetch said:

---

BAP Enthusiast said:

---

In a shocker, the other thread was deleted. Can't talk about specific things here at all in any context. Kanye found this out too just on a much larger scale.

---

Can't talk about the Catholics on this board? Weird. That was the conversation right before it got deleted.

---

*** Enough grandstanding on moderation. If you have comments on moderation, send them to Moderator at Texags. The boards aren't the place for it -- Staff ***

Deletions however if overdone only prove the point of what being suppressed. Its like calling 2020 the "most secure election in history" while deleting almost anything discussing it like the MSM went through for several months and YouTube still does very quickly after any speech.

Kanye may be a bit loopy, but he is dead on right about how the Left seeks to keep blacks pigeonholed as "a race" rather than a people or individuals.

titan said:

---

It is notable though, that the 10/6/22 episode has been basically censored. This is not trustworthy stuff, and Kanye was certainly dead on right about what the media and Democrats do about "making blacks be a race" rather than looking at them as people. His attempts to explain it might have been clumsy, but he was basically talking aboout the de-facto plantation that the DNC-MSM and even Academia fusion keeps blacks on and which Trump disrupted the messaging of a bit. And what he said about celebrities in general in cases being pressured to tow a line range true.

People are not talking about Jason Whitlock's rather important closing commentary at the last 15 minutes of that Tucker night. He expanded on the above in clearer fashion clearly approving and Whitlock is great.

---

You can't question black entertainers' unhealthy relationship with non-religious Jewish power brokers in Hollywood. Is that clear enough for you? https://t.co/tmHrEoaZ0V

— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) October 10, 2022

Whitlock also said this. Kanye's comments did not come out of left field and Whitlock knows that.

normalhorn said:

---

I knew someone would bring that up.

Here's the reply any of those banks kicking out Muslims? Since, uh, you know, they also say derogatory comments about those of the Jewish faith. Do you think old Lou Farrakhan got banned from his banks???? Wait a red hot minute he's a Democrat, right?

Nope? Ok. Move along….

---

Great point. Louis Farrakhan can talk all the sh* he wants and gets to keep his bankning relationships.

Think about how long this list would be... Three at the top of the list should be:

Maxine Waters - disparaged white people
Reverend Wright - "*********America"
Ilhan Omar - Antisemetic Tweets

I would not be surprised if Yeezy LLC has had plenty of suspicious activity and maybe even several SARs filed due to strange transactions over the years (purely speculation on my part).

From an AML perspective, social media and negative news searches are additional forms of KYC standards and firms may not want to do business with people with certain types of alerts. This combined with previous SAR reports etc, makes for an easy paper trail and support to remove Ye as a client from JPM's books.


Remember banking is no longer private due to the PATRIOT Act and our 'war on terror and 'war on drugs.'

tysker said:

---

I would not be surprised if Yeezy LLC has had plenty of suspicious activity and maybe even several SARs filed due to strange transactions over the years (purely speculation on my part).

From an AML perspective, social media and negative news searches are additional forms of KYC standards and firms may not want to do business with people with certain types of alerts. This combined with previous SAR reports etc, makes for an easy paper trail and support to remove Ye as a client from JPM's books.


Remember banking is no longer private due to the PATRIOT Act and our 'war on terror and 'war on drugs.'

---

I would not be surprised about this either. He's going to have nearly everything taken from him, including access to his kids.

tysker said:

---

I would not be surprised if Yeezy LLC has had plenty of suspicious activity and maybe even several SARs filed due to strange transactions over the years (purely speculation on my part).

From an AML perspective, social media and negative news searches are additional forms of KYC standards and firms may not want to do business with people with certain types of alerts. This combined with previous SAR reports etc, makes for an easy paper trail and support to remove Ye as a client from JPM's books.


Remember banking is no longer private due to the PATRIOT Act and our 'war on terror and 'war on drugs.'

---

A good example where the Neocons and GOP-E are only a lesser threat, not not a threat. In many ways Bush and Obama were Honorius and Arcadius in American history what those two were to Rome. (Or if go to the forward end of its history, Marius and Sulla).

Just so we're clear what's acceptable. pic.twitter.com/9QhHRyM5Pr

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 13, 2022

That kind of proves Jason Whitlock's point.

Notice that he said non-religious. Prager and Levin have said the same --- the issue is the the Left secular religion that gets substituted for God.

I haven't seen it mentioned, but y'all know Dimon is Jewish, correct?

I have no problem with Dimon. He's a ruthless business guy, which is fine, and I'd be shocked if he had anything to do with this, since JPM is whacking accounts for other folks for similar issues.

And yes, it's wrong and very likely illegal and against any civil rights issues. But these days, if you're a Christian OR a conservative, then anyone, anytime, can cut you off from doing business, and it's acceptable, especially to the Dems.

Of course, it's really funny since most Dems hate Jews, but Jews vote for the Dems. Candidly, I'm surprised the WH hasn't gone after Dimon yet because of his reasonable comments on Tuesday. The Dems already own BOA.

well well well if it isn't the consequences of ye's own actions

Ol georgie soros is at it again.

DargelSkout said:

---

In before a certain poster suggests he move it all to Bitcoin.

---

I think JPMorgan refusing Ye's business would qualify as an adverse event.

Kvetch said:

---

Sea Speed said:

---

What was the Kanye tweet about jews?

---

He made some reference to the Black Hebrew Israelite garbage that blacks are the real Jews. Basically said he can't be antisemitic because Jews are black.

Kanye seems like he is going through a bit of a manic episode. Between the tweets, the porn thing, and the Ticker interview, he's made it apparent that something's not quite right. Those around him should really try to reign him in a bit.

Also, if JP Morgan is debanking him specifically for those tweets, people should close their JP Morgan accounts. You can't start setting the precedent of debanking American citizens that have stupid opinions that you think are wrong.

---

P Diddy tried, and Ye doubled down on the Jewish folks.
From BMX's link earlier:

Tramp96 said:

---

Texags Leftists, Progressives, Liberals, and Concerned Moderates:

Please explain how this is different than the Woolworth's lunch counter?

---

Because it's OK to discriminate against Conservatives in the Woke Leftist Cult's Catechism.

the maga hat gotta be in Kanye's closet talking to him like the green goblin

— outlandish🌪 (@dreddykrueger) October 6, 2022

First it was Alex Jones and he was too crazy to defend. Then Michelle Malkin and she was too radical. Now it is Kanye... and many more I left out.

They are testing to see how far we will allow, and how much we will tolerate.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

First it was Alex Jones and he was too crazy to defend. Then Michelle Malkin and she was too radical. Now it is Kanye... and many more I left out.

They are testing to see how far we will allow much we will tolerate.

---

Big difference between the first and others. Even 9/11 ideas make more sense than Sandy Hook. Its a level of screwball that can't be effectively defended, like you said. I didn't know Malkin had been blackballed?

And Kanye -- -I guess its playing out. But they also seem to be going after Candace and she is not crazy.

titan said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

First it was Alex Jones and he was too crazy to defend. Then Michelle Malkin and she was too radical. Now it is Kanye... and many more I left out.

They are testing to see how far we will allow much we will tolerate.

---

Big difference between the first and others. Even 9/11 ideas make more sense than Sandy Hook. Its a level of screwball that can't be effectively defended, like you said. I didn't know Malkin had been blackballed?

And Kanye -- -I guess its playing out. But they also seem to be going after Candace and she is not crazy.

---

Not really free speech is free speech.

There are certain things you're not allowed to talk about...
I'll let yall figure out what they are.

I don't think the Alex Jones thing is a clear-cut free speech issue. That thread is long and do not really know the legalisms involved but he seems to have crossed real boundaries. It seems different from Pelosi's Jan 6 witch hunt. Now with Kanye, it is a concern --- -having watched Tucker's 10/6 episode there wasn't anything out of line, and its an open question how much unused material should be valid to reference.

titan said:

---

I don't think the Alex Jones thing is a clear-cut free speech issue. That thread is long and do not really know the legalisms involved but he seems to have crossed real boundaries. It seems different from Pelosi's Jan 6 witch hunt. Now with Kanye, it is a concern --- -having watched Tucker's 10/6 episode there wasn't anything out of line, and its an open question how much unused material should be valid to reference.

---

I really like you as a poster.

I strongly disagree with you on the free speech issue.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

titan said:

---

I don't think the Alex Jones thing is a clear-cut free speech issue. That thread is long and do not really know the legalisms involved but he seems to have crossed real boundaries. It seems different from Pelosi's Jan 6 witch hunt. Now with Kanye, it is a concern --- -having watched Tucker's 10/6 episode there wasn't anything out of line, and its an open question how much unused material should be valid to reference.

---

I really like you as a poster.

I strongly disagree with you on the free speech issue.

---

No problem, and not even that significant. Because it is only my impression. It doesn't even count as an informed opinion. (Like the Russia remarks do) Like I said--- I do not know the legalisms involved. Even the boundary of "yelling fire" has never been entirely clear to me.

TLDR: Don't worry, you are probably right to hold your position.

titan said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

titan said:

---

I don't think the Alex Jones thing is a clear-cut free speech issue. That thread is long and do not really know the legalisms involved but he seems to have crossed real boundaries. It seems different from Pelosi's Jan 6 witch hunt. Now with Kanye, it is a concern --- -having watched Tucker's 10/6 episode there wasn't anything out of line, and its an open question how much unused material should be valid to reference.

---

I really like you as a poster.

I strongly disagree with you on the free speech issue.

---

No problem, and not even that significant. Because it is only my impression. It doesn't even count as an informed opinion. (Like the Russia remarks do) Like I said--- I do not know the legalisms involved. Even the boundary of "yelling fire" has never been entirely clear to me.

TLDR: Don't worry, you are probably right to hold your position.

---

I don't have to defend his speech to defend his right to say it.

So JP Morgan de-banked the National Committee for Religious Freedom for inexplicable reasons but then said they’d let them back in if they SHARED THEIR DONOR LIST. pic.twitter.com/i4qfbhjFzO

— Rachel Bovard (@rachelbovard) October 13, 2022

The answer cannot be for conservatives to ghettoize themselves in small banks with limited depository, investment, and lending services because the major institutions have denied them access for voting for the wrong people or saying the wrong thing about vaccines.

— Rachel Bovard (@rachelbovard) October 13, 2022

TxAgPreacher said:

---

titan said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

titan said:

---

I don't think the Alex Jones thing is a clear-cut free speech issue. That thread is long and do not really know the legalisms involved but he seems to have crossed real boundaries. It seems different from Pelosi's Jan 6 witch hunt. Now with Kanye, it is a concern --- -having watched Tucker's 10/6 episode there wasn't anything out of line, and its an open question how much unused material should be valid to reference.

---

I really like you as a poster.

I strongly disagree with you on the free speech issue.

---

No problem, and not even that significant. Because it is only my impression. It doesn't even count as an informed opinion. (Like the Russia remarks do) Like I said--- I do not know the legalisms involved. Even the boundary of "yelling fire" has never been entirely clear to me.

TLDR: Don't worry, you are probably right to hold your position.

---

I don't have to defend his speech to defend his right to say it.

---

Alex Jones was sued for defamation and lost. He didn't have the right to say what he did.

Now that doesn't mean what happened to him after was justified.

So will Adidas drop "Ye"

This is all a bunch of B.S.

It is undeniable that this illustrates an advantage of a decentralized currency. I think as the US moves toward a social credit system instances like this will become more and more common.

nm