Our newer Maytag uses an agitator. I do not know if it's "direct drive" but I f'ing hate it.Old Sarge said:Speed Queen TC-5 for the win here.schwack schwack said:Quote:
If you can make them better with less water, I'm all for it.
I'm still not convinced that our washing machine really cleans clothes with so little water. I wish I had taken my Mom's old harvest gold Maytag units when she sold her house - that baby held a swimming pool of water & never required service.
edit: no fancy electronics either: pull the knob, turn the knob, push the knob.
We had a 17 year old set of Whirlpool Gold W/D that still worked but was showing some age. Knowing we intend to build a fish cabin/bay house in the next few years, and electronics fair poorly in that environment, we replaced them with a Speed Queen TC-5 washer and matching dryer. Prepped the old Whirlpools for storage for later.
The Speed Queen definitely cleans, with an old school direct drive agitator off of a transmission. No belts here. Can fill the tub as well, as it gets by standards by having the Eco Wash setting that you can reduce the amount of water if you want to. Loads take half the time of big names on the market for each similar type wash. Wife can have 6 full size loads knocked out starting mid-morning and finishing by dinner.
Speed queen has turning knobs and timers but the start button is electronic. Afraid we just aren't gonna get away from that nowadays.
Give me a non-agitator machine all day long. I will be **** canning this washer and putting it on the curb when we move and it's basically brand new. Don't even care.


