To even include it means it's an important part of their group identity.

FDT92 said:

---

BTKAG97 said:

---

JohnFootball2 sounds like an unoriginal handle a Fed would use.

---

Was JohnnyUtah taken?

---

Unfortunately Johnny2wives was taken as well…

I've never seen these guys actually do or say anything that's actually bad. There may be something out there, but I just haven't seen it.

I'm convinced they're feds.

Created to look like a right wing group. They do nothing to change or fight the narrative. All the members are in shape and you never see their faces.

Yes 31 were "arrested," but were they charged with crimes? You'd think that if they were charged with anything and convicted, their IDs would be all over the place. There's not anything in the article linked above that mentions any of them by name. Usually they'll at least name a leader.

It's all a setup to push the narrative and to provoke people.

FroWins said:

---

I've never seen these guys actually do or say anything that's actually bad. There may be something out there, but I just haven't seen it.

I'm convinced they're feds.

Created to look like a right wing group. They do nothing to change or fight the narrative. All the members are in shape and you never see their faces.

Yes 31 were "arrested," but were they charged with crimes? You'd think that if they were charged with anything and convicted, their IDs would be all over the place. There not even anything in the article linked above that mentions any of them by name.

It's all a setup to push the narrative and to provoke people.

---

I think what most people mean when they say feds is there probably not 100% or even 50% feds but they are definitely sponsored by Fed money and their leader ship is definitely infiltrated or at least fed informants.

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.


Hopefully their masks fit well while marching

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

Ok

Quote:

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.

---

Weird how that works, isn't it?

fredfredunderscorefred said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.


Hopefully their masks fit well while marching

---

There have been Patriot Front threads posted here numerous times over the years. If you haven't heard about them, then that's your fault.

Gator92 said:

---

Feds...

---

Well duh. That's the only logical assumption. Just like this stupid fbi dude in this article:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/neo-nazi-child-grooming-abuse-omegle-1234734931/

Nanomachines son said:

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

---

Calling BS. These fakers are called out loudest of all on those platforms.

Nanomachines son said:

---

fredfredunderscorefred said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.


Hopefully their masks fit well while marching

---

There have been Patriot Front threads posted here numerous times over the years. If you haven't heard about them, then that's your fault.

---

I'm quite alright not knowing about them. Or any other weird groups that have no real significance like cat lovers of America. Now antifa that goes around torching buildings and destroying cities, that's a group that doesn't require venturing to the dissident sphere to know much about.

My favorite thing about this is how everyone thinks that the only way for a right wing group to be real is if they commit crimes as of right wing people aren't naturally far more law-abiding than left wing people.

Also, these are DISSIDENTS, not conservatives. Why would you think they ever represented you? They are far right, not libertarian and not conservative. They never had any intention of ever-representing normal Republicans, at all, ever. Apparently if you don't have big standard basic conservati political beliefs then you're a fed.

You all say this about Christian nationalists, white nationalists, America First, general dissidents or anyone who likes or wants anything outside of Reagan. Without dissidents, Trump would have never happened yet you all now call them feds, it's amazing.

Quote:

---

Also, these are DISSIDENTS, not conservatives.

---

If they are dissidents, are you suggesting their goal is overturning the government?

It is incredibly revealing that anytime a conservative sees a group of fit, well organized men doing something other than bitching online about hypocrisy, they go “nah, definitely not my guys. Nice try, fed.”

— John Doyle (@ComradeDoyIe) May 14, 2023

Right wing street activism is definitely real. Just because they're organized and not fat does not make them feds lol.

coconutED said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

---

Calling BS. These fakers are called out loudest of all on those platforms.

---

You're not on those platforms, I guarantee it. Why? Because every single one of those places are full people using language and terms that would get you an instant ban here. People on this forum are always shocked when they visit /pol/ for any reason as they see what 90% of the people actually post there.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Also, these are DISSIDENTS, not conservatives.

---

If they are dissidents, are you suggesting their goal is overturning the government?

---

No, their goal is completely reforming it. Dissidents are not anarchists, they are generally however, authoritarian.

Nanomachines son said:

---

You're not on those platforms, I guarantee it. Why? Because every single one of those places are full people using language and terms that would get you an instant ban here. People on this forum are always shocked when they visit /pol/ for any reason as they see what 90% of the people actually post there.

---

Thanks for telling me which websites I do and do not visit, I was worried for a moment that I was getting into some scary *****

Quote:

---

No, their goal is completely reforming it. Dissidents are not anarchists, they are generally however, authoritarian.

---

Authoritarian in the sense they want to ditch the Constitution or a large portion of it?

Trying to understand what you are saying here.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

No, their goal is completely reforming it. Dissidents are not anarchists, they are generally however, authoritarian.

---

Authoritarian in the sense they want to ditch the Constitution or a large portion of it?

Trying to understand what you are saying here.

---

Perhaps you would care to peruse their manifesto?

https://patriotfront.us/manifesto/

Thank you.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

No, their goal is completely reforming it. Dissidents are not anarchists, they are generally however, authoritarian.

---

Authoritarian in the sense they want to ditch the Constitution or a large portion of it?

Trying to understand what you are saying here.

---

Either ditch it or return to the laws in place in 1795.

The laws in place in 1795 includes the Constitution and the first eleven amendments.

Nanomachines son said:

---

fredfredunderscorefred said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.


Hopefully their masks fit well while marching

---

There have been Patriot Front threads posted here numerous times over the years. If you haven't heard about them, then that's your fault.

---

So says are resident federali.

JohnFootball2 said:

---

FDT92 said:

---

BTKAG97 said:

---

JohnFootball2 sounds like an unoriginal handle a Fed would use.

---

Was JohnnyUtah taken?

---

Unfortunately Johnny2wives was taken as well…

---

This is one of many socks named after JFF. Same poster, same crap posts.

Nanomachines son said:

---

There have been Patriot Front threads posted here numerous times over the years. If you haven't heard about them, then that's your fault.

---

So clearly a sock... i.e. Fed.

aggiehawg said:

---

The laws in place in 1795 includes the Constitution and the first eleven amendments.

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell. They want the laws as they were written, word for word with the original intention.

JamesBREI06 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

fredfredunderscorefred said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

They don't. Patriot Front is an explicit white nationalist group. They may allow some hispanics based upon the pictures here in the Vice article but absolutely no one else.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88q4zg/patriot-front-31-arrested

They are extremely strict about who they do and do not allow in.

---

And you know this personally how?

FTR: Vice went bankrupt and is now owned by Soros.

---

Because I've been in the dissident sphere for almost a decade. These guys have been around for a while and formed as a direct result of what happened at Charlottesville.

If you're not on Telegram, /pol/, rw Twitter, Gab, etc. then you're going to be clueless about the dissident right sphere. 95% of Texags knows nothing about what goes on in that arena because none of you go to these places.

If you don't go to any of the places then you really shouldn't even comment on this.

---

Well that certainly didn't sound like a fed answer. LOL.

---

So it's a group almost nobody has heard of and an overwhelming conservative politics board has never heard of them and indeed mocks them….and they're the most dangerous threat to democracy ever.


Hopefully their masks fit well while marching

---

There have been Patriot Front threads posted here numerous times over the years. If you haven't heard about them, then that's your fault.

---

So says are resident federali.

---

Based, I must be doing something right.

Quote:

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell.

---

What? Are you accusing me of something there?

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell.

---

What? Are you accusing me of something there?

---

Go read the naturalization act of 1790 and get back to me. I don't think you realize what I'm implying.

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

The laws in place in 1795 includes the Constitution and the first eleven amendments.

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell. They want the laws as they were written, word for word with the original intention.

---

Enlighten me, what's racist about the constitution?

RGLAG85 said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

The laws in place in 1795 includes the Constitution and the first eleven amendments.

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell. They want the laws as they were written, word for word with the original intention.

---

Enlighten me, what's racist about the constitution?

---

If we actually followed what the Constitution said and what the early laws said, 95% of the conservatives here would call it racist. And by follow, I don't mean modern interpretations, I mean follow exactly what the Founders said about diversity, race, and religion. That's what Patriot Front wants, but it's obviously not what you all want. You want what some random later judge said the Founders intended, which is not at all what they said.

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell.

---

What? Are you accusing me of something there?

---

Go read the naturalization act of 1790 and get back to me. I don't think you realize what I'm implying.

---

YOU have a problem.

Quote:

---

Congress first defined eligibility for
citizenship
by
naturalization
in this law, and limited this important right to "free white persons." In practice, only white, male property owners could naturalize and acquire the status of citizens, whereas women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants could not.

---

LINK

aggiehawg said:

---

Nanomachines son said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Yes and you would be calling every single law in existence from that time period racist as all hell.

---

What? Are you accusing me of something there?

---

Go read the naturalization act of 1790 and get back to me. I don't think you realize what I'm implying.

---

YOU have a problem.

Quote:

---

Congress first defined eligibility for
citizenship
by
naturalization
in this law, and limited this important right to "free white persons." In practice, only white, male property owners could naturalize and acquire the status of citizens, whereas women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants could not.

---

LINK

---

This is what Patriot Front wants.