BREAKING: A Runbeck Election Services whistleblower claims approximately 300,000 illegal ballots for Katie Hobbs were inserted into the Arizona 2022 election without going through the lawful chain of custody.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 10, 2023
Runbeck
8,405 Views |
82 Replies |
Last: 19 days ago by flown-the-coop
About f***in' time.
I believe your questioning of Runbeck and potential problems was spot on.aggiehawg said:
About f***in' time.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
Stolen.
The more I dug into reaerching them, the more alarmed I became that basically the entire state of AZ's elections (Maricopa County being the largest population center) was in private hands with no supervision nor oversight. Further, even when asked to show their work, they refused because they are a private entity. This coming froma company with a website that repeatedly claims they have a fully auditable process for everything but then refuse to audit anything.richardag said:I believe your questioning of Runbeck and potential problems was spot on.aggiehawg said:
About f***in' time.
And they controlled absolutely every phase of the election, barring in person election day voting.
Thank you for your research, the information and questions you raised. Maybe the truth will come out whether good or bad. Our government should be absolutely geared towards transparency.aggiehawg said:The more I dug into reaerching them, the more alarmed I became that basically the entire state of AZ's elections (Maricopa County being the largest population center) was in private hands with no supervision nor oversight. Further, even when asked to show their work, they refused because they are a private entity. This coming froma company with a website that repeatedly claims they have a fully auditable process for everything but then refuse to audit anything.richardag said:I believe your questioning of Runbeck and potential problems was spot on.aggiehawg said:
About f***in' time.
And they controlled absolutely every phase of the election, barring in person election day voting.
We really need to rewrite our laws concerning libel and slander.
I have no doubt that massive fraud was committed in the 2020 Arizona election, and it was the basis for multiple Dem "victories."
However, by this time, I think all discernible, actionable vote fraud audit trails have very likely been thoroughly scrubbed. The whistleblower will have to provide irrefutable physical/electronic/written documentary proof for the accusation to gain traction. I strongly doubt such evidence exists in a judicially useful context.. I hope I am wrong.
However, by this time, I think all discernible, actionable vote fraud audit trails have very likely been thoroughly scrubbed. The whistleblower will have to provide irrefutable physical/electronic/written documentary proof for the accusation to gain traction. I strongly doubt such evidence exists in a judicially useful context.. I hope I am wrong.
In an election:
1 obvious cheating happens
2 courts drag their feet
3 the loser "wins" the election
4 proof is found years later and it's "too late to do anything about it"
5 nothing is fixed for the next election
6 repeat
This is what happens if citizens continue to allow the government to run elections.
1 obvious cheating happens
2 courts drag their feet
3 the loser "wins" the election
4 proof is found years later and it's "too late to do anything about it"
5 nothing is fixed for the next election
6 repeat
This is what happens if citizens continue to allow the government to run elections.
I forget her name now but a retired systems management woman was a poll worker in Maricopa County counting center for over a week after the 2020 election. Her testimony was that everytime they were told they were nearly donecounting, thousands and thousands of new mial in ballots would arrive from Runbeck overnight. That went on for ten days after the election.
When she asked the elections supervisor on site why didn't know how many ballots were still outstanding, she was told that Runbeck (who sent out all of those ballots and then collected them from the post office to scan) wouldn't tell them.
All despite a voter specific barcode being printed on the outside envelope that was scanned upon shipping and again upon being brought back from the main postal facility and drop boxes. IOW, Runbeck knew exactly how many ballots they sent out and how many had been returned and specifically who those voters were.
When she asked the elections supervisor on site why didn't know how many ballots were still outstanding, she was told that Runbeck (who sent out all of those ballots and then collected them from the post office to scan) wouldn't tell them.
All despite a voter specific barcode being printed on the outside envelope that was scanned upon shipping and again upon being brought back from the main postal facility and drop boxes. IOW, Runbeck knew exactly how many ballots they sent out and how many had been returned and specifically who those voters were.
Shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Who is the whistleblower reporting this to in terms of official authority that can and will do something about it?
I've always been ready to see these things come to light within an official investigation or court case. I realize the potential issues are the powers that be blocking anything from seeing the light of day, but wasn't the AZ Leg investigating and holding hearing on this for months?
Is this a new whistleblower that has never been heard from before? I'm not seeing any more information when clicking on the link.
I've always been ready to see these things come to light within an official investigation or court case. I realize the potential issues are the powers that be blocking anything from seeing the light of day, but wasn't the AZ Leg investigating and holding hearing on this for months?
Is this a new whistleblower that has never been heard from before? I'm not seeing any more information when clicking on the link.
No idea who this is nor whom they may be talking with regarding the opeations of Runbeck.
Just hope we finally get some transparency.
Just hope we finally get some transparency.
So what does 300,000 votes do? I can't remember the counts
AZ in 2020 for POTUS was a little over 10,000.fullback44 said:
So what does 300,000 votes do? I can't remember the counts
Your post is about 2022.
Then a little over 17,000 in the Governor's race.Manhattan said:
Your post is about 2022.
Better?
ETA: Margin in 2022 AG's race is 280 votes.
annie88 said:
Shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Yeah.
We ALL are.....
So if this is officially confirmed what would be the likely
Outcome? If we lived in a just world some people should be going to jail and at least the governor's election should be overturned.
Outcome? If we lived in a just world some people should be going to jail and at least the governor's election should be overturned.
aggiehawg said:Then a little over 17,000 in the Governor's race.Manhattan said:
Your post is about 2022.
Better?
ETA: Margin in 2022 AG's race is 280 votes.
There really is zero reason to even vote … they do what they want .. if the other side were to cheat like them they throw them in jail w their controlled courts .. not worth going to the polls as long as this is all going on ! It's gonna be hard to vote going forward
Is that link down for everyone else?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/huge-runbeck-whistleblower-reveals-chain-custody-298942-maricopa-county-ballots-delivered-runbeck-election-day-not-exist-employees-allowed-add-family-members-ballots/
Found this from December last year?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/huge-runbeck-whistleblower-reveals-chain-custody-298942-maricopa-county-ballots-delivered-runbeck-election-day-not-exist-employees-allowed-add-family-members-ballots/
Found this from December last year?
I get the sentiment, but who would run it then?TexAgs91 said:
In an election:
1 obvious cheating happens
2 courts drag their feet
3 the loser "wins" the election
4 proof is found years later and it's "too late to do anything about it"
5 nothing is fixed for the next election
6 repeat
This is what happens if citizens continue to allow the government to run elections.
Runbeck is a private company. So, it appears they may be compromised.
Ag with kids said:I get the sentiment, but who would run it then?TexAgs91 said:
In an election:
1 obvious cheating happens
2 courts drag their feet
3 the loser "wins" the election
4 proof is found years later and it's "too late to do anything about it"
5 nothing is fixed for the next election
6 repeat
This is what happens if citizens continue to allow the government to run elections.
Runbeck is a private company. So, it appears they may be compromised.
The system is broken. It doesn't allow for tainted ballots to be tossed out when fraud has occurred. There is no recount anymore like the 2000 election. If you have 100s of thousands of pristine ballots that supposedly came in an envelope without being folded you do a recount end exclude those from the count.
Oh boy we got 'em! I expect big things to come from this!captkirk said:BREAKING: A Runbeck Election Services whistleblower claims approximately 300,000 illegal ballots for Katie Hobbs were inserted into the Arizona 2022 election without going through the lawful chain of custody.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 10, 2023
I'm waiting for this to be the lead story on MSNBC and CNN this morning...
This should outage every American. If it slips by without serious scrutiny and investigation, this country/government is lost for good. Arizona Republicans should be all over this and if proven true, a lot of people need to be in prison. Maybe even demand a special election for every office in question.captkirk said:BREAKING: A Runbeck Election Services whistleblower claims approximately 300,000 illegal ballots for Katie Hobbs were inserted into the Arizona 2022 election without going through the lawful chain of custody.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 10, 2023
Democrats cheating in elections in Arizona since the 1880's………..
Quote:
Johnny Ringo just wasn't just an ordinary outlaw: he was also interested in politics.
Even before moving to Arizona, he won an election as a Mason County (Texas) constable in 1878. After moving to Arizona, he wedged himself into local politics. For the 1880 election he was appointed a delegate to the Pima County Democratic Convention despite the fact he had no legal residence.
He then was appointed with Ike Clayton as an election official for the San Simon district, appointments which were subsequently officially revoked because of the residency problem. But this was not a setback for Ringo, who steamed ahead to oversee a very interesting election.
The San Simon district only had up to a dozen voters. However, election results showed 103 votes for the Democratic candidate to one for the Republican. This gave Democrats control of the territorial legislature.
This legislature formed Cochise County and also proved vital to overriding plans to send out the state militia against the cowboys. This allowed violence in the territory to increase, making Arizona truly an emblem of the wild West.
It was in this atmosphere that the famous gunfight near the O.K. Corral occurred in 1881.
At some point, folks on this board will start to listen to you.aggiehawg said:
About f***in' time.
Those that think Trump lost the election due to actual voting are just burying their heads in the sand.
If a bank didn't have guards, didn't require a picture ID for transactions and then came up with wildly crazy bank balances...and then refused to be audited because the numbers were in the banks favor...
Only an idiot would believe it when the bank says "nothing to see here... everything is fair and on the level".
Only an idiot would believe it when the bank says "nothing to see here... everything is fair and on the level".
Where the Concerned moderates at to defend this?
Just a reminder, Runbeck also provided mail in ballots in Fulton County, Georgia as well. How many of those ballots were no-conforming?
Arizona: Preliminary AZ Senate Forensic Ballot Audit Findings - over 200,000 'non-conforming' 2020 ballots
— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) September 5, 2023
Georgia: Court claim total of 'non-conforming' 2020 ballots still locked up - "nearly 150,000."
Pop Quiz: Who (legally) prints ballots for both Maricopa & Fulton County? https://t.co/aDbxljl5Iz pic.twitter.com/nADQUrAeZH
Didn't Kommie Hobbs get to certify their own election?
Yes. Refused to recuse herself in the governor's election in 2022.MaroonStain said:
Didn't Kommie Hobbs get to certify their own election?
Somehow I'm guessing this whistleblower will be labelled a nut and conspiracy theorist and discredited rather than be taken seriously and hailed as heroes as those the Dems like to use to oh, I don't know, secure impeachments for an overseas phone call.
About a month ago, I read that there was a new equity partner in Runbeck, one with GOP ties. Then again, AZ Republicans are more in the McCain wing than anything else, so I didn't even post it at the time. Didn't consider it that noteworthy at the time.4stringAg said:
Somehow I'm guessing this whistleblower will be labelled a nut and conspiracy theorist and discredited rather than be taken seriously and hailed as heroes as those the Dems like to use to oh, I don't know, secure impeachments for an overseas phone call.
Featured Stories
See All
10:14
9h ago
4.9k
Zach Clemence leads Texas A&M's 3-point barrage vs. South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
5:03
8h ago
1.1k
Game Highlights: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Reece Nygren
9:44
1d ago
2.5k
Shane Sdao's injury changed his perspective on baseball and life
by Ryan Brauninger
16:15
1d ago
2.1k