95LawAg said:
fka ftc said:
95LawAg said:
fka ftc said:
95LawAg said:
oh no said:
unless you want to defend why you voted for the invasion and state your case on why we needed these 8 million unvetted migrants in less than 3 years from over a 170 countries to claim asylum (even though they aren't seeking asylum) and please explain how Americans are benefiting from not having a border, you are derailing the semi-official invasion thread. James Woods explains why Japan doesn't have an invastion problem. First part is their culture, second part is not inviting an invasion of people that hate them like the one you support.
You posted the tweet extolling the benefits of a homogenous, indigenous culture. I challenged the notion of America ever having such a culture - past, present, or future.
Now you've introduced a new topic about how I might have voted. That would seem different from discussing the tweet you posted and I responded to.
Back to the subject at hand, how has being an island nation affected immigration in Japan? Is it not easier to cross a land border? There are many factors beyond the US not having a homogenous, indigenous culture.
Most of our immigrants prior to the last 50 years or so arrived by boat.
Valid point, but those were also primarily legal immigrants. The discussion at hand is about illegal immigration, the "invasion." Illegal immigration is more difficult into an island nation.
I am assuming you believe all the Cubans in Miami just walked across the land bridge in the mid 20th century AD?
No, but I believe they had a 'more difficult' journey than crossing over land. Not to imply that the illegal journey across the desert is easy.
less than 90 miles of relatively calm, warm water vs trekking through the Darian Gap facing terrorists and cartels.
Me thinks you have a poor, very poor understanding of this topic. Regardless, the border both by sea and by land should be guarded against all intruders. Unauthorized visitors should be detained. Any attempt to avoid detention should be met with lethal force.
All detained individuals should be returned to the country from which they entered or their country of origin. Any costs incurred should be offset against any aid the US government provides to that country.
And that is just the start of what needs to be done.