Dysfunctional Harris campaign

7,221 Views | 70 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Owlagdad
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

beanbean said:

LMAO I remember dems talking about what an awesome pick Walz was. Going to appeal to the average Joe.


I distinctly remember Barbacoa Taco saying "cope harder" when we were trashing it.

Haven't seen that dude post in weeks.


Crying tears of soy like the rest of the betas.
Deputy Travis Junior
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coog97 said:

They didn't pick Shapiro for obvious "reasons."

I am very glad they inexplicably chose the Walz clown instead of Mark Kelly.

Sure, let's go with the awkward, closeted goofball from one of the most consistently deep blue states in the union rather than the military man, famous Astronaut and husband of a very sympathetic figure in Gabby Giffords, who happens to be a senator from an important swing state.

Great call!!!


Yea I ultimately don't think it would have mattered as the down ballot voting showed that people were sick of democrats top to bottom, but wow, what a stupid pick. In an election in which Kamala knew she needed to appear at least somewhat moderate, she picked a hyper progressive goofball from a deep blue state who put tampons in school bathrooms. Kelly or Shapiro at least makes it interesting.

It's hard to overstate just how bad Kamala is at politics. She doesn't know how to build and manage a good team, read a room, build a coherent and palatable platform, manage a campaign, or speak in public. She's just awful. Part of me thinks That the democrats resigned themselves to defeat after Biden pissed down his leg, and opportunistically gave Kamala a chance thinking "we'll either be pleasantly surprised or rid ourselves of a liability that we can't publicly toss aside because she checks too many victimhood boxes."
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harris had a terrible track record. Harris was a terrible campaigner.

Walz had a mostly terrible but certainly irrelevant track record. Walz was a terrible campaigner.

Entire Harris/Walz campaign was poorly run.

You can't polish a turd.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Harris was candidate for 110 days.

She got a bump from the Democratic Party convention. That was about three days.

She had a good debate. That was about three-day bump.

Trump lost the news cycle with Puerto Rico joke. That was a two-day bump.


Harris campaign won the news cycle on 8 days.
Trump campaign won the news cycle on 102 days.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

I think Harris was candidate for 110 days.

She got a bump from the Democratic Party convention. That was about three days.

She had a good debate. That was about three-day bump.

Trump lost the news cycle with Puerto Rico joke. That was a two-day bump.


Harris campaign won the news cycle on 8 days.
Trump campaign won the news cycle on 102 days.
The Harris support was fake and manufactured, just like she is. The sane people saw through this and finally enough got tired of the outright gaslighting.
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biz Ag said:

Dan Scott said:

Why would they do an event in Maine so close to election?


Makes no sense. Somebody somewhere is going to write a book about what an abject disaster her campaign was.
See if this helps:
Somebody somewhere is going to write a book about what an abject disaster her Vice Presidency and Presidential campaign was were.
texag84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aborted a pro-abortion rally. Yep, that's dysfunctional all right
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79 said:

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

Impossible. Many of the screeching, blubbering idiots on these post-election videos say she ran a great campaign. Best ever, even.

Perfect and awesome, flawless even. At least one talking head going on and on about how she couldn't believe the cackler lost.
Tragic that Democrat voters accept Democrats lying in their positive assessments of the Harris-Walz Presidential campaign which should be described as a debacle, fiasco, imbroglio at best. The overwhelming electoral and popular vote for Donald Trump along with the dramatic increase in support across most voter categories should have given any pro-Harris politicians and Analysts pause before complimenting her run for President.

Sports analysts would not be able to get away with saying the Coach of a football team had a perfectly executed game plan in a Home Game his team lost 65 to 15. Why are Democrat news analysts and Democrat elected officials allowed to get away with this?
Biz Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scruffy said:

Did she really pick him?
Or was he forced upon her same how she was picked by committee to be president nominee once Biden poo'd the bed in the first debate?


Either way, how in the eff did anyone think choosing someone to the LEFT of Harris was a winning play? Cray cray.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
WolfCall said:

rab79 said:

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

Impossible. Many of the screeching, blubbering idiots on these post-election videos say she ran a great campaign. Best ever, even.

Perfect and awesome, flawless even. At least one talking head going on and on about how she couldn't believe the cackler lost.
Tragic that Democrat voters accept Democrats lying in their positive assessments of the Harris-Walz Presidential campaign which should be described as a debacle, fiasco, imbroglio at best. The overwhelming electoral and popular vote for Donald Trump along with the dramatic increase in support across most voter categories should have given any pro-Harris politicians and Analysts pause before complimenting her run for President.

Sports analysts would not be able to get away with saying the Coach of a football team had a perfectly executed game plan in a Home Game his team lost 65 to 15. Why are Democrat news analysts and Democrat elected officials allowed to get away with this?
Our MSM truly is Iraqi Information Minister in quality. Even Berlin was not getting this level of lies from Goebbels in the last years. He tried to mobilize the city with medium doses of the truth.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:


Unfortunately for her, she's out of a job too.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Epic
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scruffy said:

Did she really pick him?
Or was he forced upon her same how she was picked by committee to be president nominee once Biden poo'd the bed in the first debate?
Can't have someone outshine her. Walz was about the only one on earth that met those qualifications.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still think he was chosen deliberately because they knew she wouldn't win and they wanted another scapegoat. But either way Trump won.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unfortunately for her, she's out of a job too.

Apparently, she's a comedian/influencer that has a lot of other gigs. This is just one thing she does so she'll be fine. But I think she can do this for quite a bit longer.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there anybody not employed by the MSM that kamala gets along with? Seriously, anybody???
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
doubledog said:

Who could have predicted this....

Quote:

'Not a healthy environment': Kamala Harris' office rife with dissent

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/30/kamala-harris-office-dissent-497290
Some news never seems old.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember before she picked Walz the hardcore Marxists like Michael Moore were pushing him hard.

The campaign knew she was gonna have to pivot hard towards the center if she had a prayer, and Walz was their attempt to keep the Marxists on board.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

annie88 said:


Unfortunately for her, she's out of a job too.
She's posted that she has a lot more non Kamalalala stuff coming
jopatura
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kamala knew if she picked Kelly everyone would wonder why he wasn't at the top of the ticket. No one would give a **** about Kamala 0.2 seconds after Kelly was announced.

Walz was probably the one dude she could find where no one wanted him as President instead.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

beanbean said:

LMAO I remember dems talking about what an awesome pick Walz was. Going to appeal to the average Joe.
And then he couldn't load his "own" gun. And constantly messed up sports analogies as a supposed former HS football coach. He never got past "Tampon Tim."

Still cannot believe Holder was supposed to be doing vetting for possible Veeps.

Holder still thinks he can buy off or bully everyone.

Walz was picked solely because Harris couldn't pick someone intelligent and show her up.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the reasons "she" picked him are simple. (btw she had no part in this decision)

1. They needed a grey-headed white guy for optics, to counter and win over the systemic racists everywhere.
2. They knew she would have a decent chance of losing and didn't want to waste one of the tiny handful of Dems who are semi-capable of the office, and who might be electable in the future.
3. They needed someone who fit 1 and 2, who was also dumb enough and committed enough to the party to believe in her, who could keep a straight face in 'selling' her to the folks.

Boom, Walz is your guy. Two throw-away candidates who in the big picture view, have he value of a crushed up 7-Eleven cup on the side of the road.
Pretty sure most of you don’t know me.
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

beanbean said:

LMAO I remember dems talking about what an awesome pick Walz was. Going to appeal to the average Joe.


I distinctly remember Barbacoa Taco saying "cope harder" when we were trashing it.

Haven't seen that dude post in weeks.

He,she,it is somewhere in a rubber room fit with a straight jacket. Aka Nicholson slobbering after his frontal lobotomy in "One flew over the ****oo's nest!"
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueTaze said:

Waltz was only choice bc Shapiro and the others didn't want to partner with such a horrible candidate.
Bingo!
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
Illuminaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agent-maroon said:

Is there anybody not employed by the MSM that kamala gets along with? Seriously, anybody???
Among all the gaslighting, misinformation, and outright lies from the left, the claim that 90% of Kamala's staff resigned because she was too prepared is the most far-fetched. I'd sooner believe Joe was faking his mental decline and is sharp as a tack than accept that Harris was simply too organized to need assistance.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jopatura said:

Kamala knew if she picked Kelly everyone would wonder why he wasn't at the top of the ticket. No one would give a **** about Kamala 0.2 seconds after Kelly was announced.

Walz was probably the one dude she could find where no one wanted him as President instead.
I think Walz's dance moves were worse than Harris and that is why she picked him. Can't have the backup out perform the star now can we.
ApachePilot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:




Thanks for sharing. This is so spot on.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burrus86 said:

In the Democrat world, it's ALWAYS someone else's fault. That gives the blamer the opportunity to double down again without recourse.
That's typical of all losing campaigns. Not just Democrats.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91AggieLawyer said:

aggiehawg said:

beanbean said:

LMAO I remember dems talking about what an awesome pick Walz was. Going to appeal to the average Joe.
And then he couldn't load his "own" gun. And constantly messed up sports analogies as a supposed former HS football coach. He never got past "Tampon Tim."

Still cannot believe Holder was supposed to be doing vetting for possible Veeps.

Holder still thinks he can buy off or bully everyone.

Walz was picked solely because Harris couldn't pick someone intelligent and show her up.


Which is a dumb way to lead. I always try to hire people smarter than me and I'm usually successful at that considering how low that bar is.
Bluto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

I think Harris was candidate for 110 days.

She got a bump from the Democratic Party convention. That was about three days.

She had a good debate. That was about three-day bump.

Trump lost the news cycle with Puerto Rico joke. That was a two-day bump.


Harris campaign won the news cycle on 8 days.
Trump campaign won the news cycle on 102 days.

I believe Trump, with Biden's help, won the Pierto Rico joke news cycle by taking the air out of it when he showed up in a garbage truck! And doubled down doing his rally that night wearing the safety vest and making fun of himself.

There was no counter punch for that.

The fact that Biden made his Trump supporter garbage comment, along with numerous other things he said that seemed to overshadow or neutralize her messaging at critical times, illustrates just how poorly the entire operation was run. While they did a good job coordinating with the media, there seemed to be little coordination within the campaign.

Now we know why.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think this also goes back to people want to be able to laugh in public again. The Democrats have killed humor with their identity politics insanity.

We should all be able to laugh at ourselves and dark and insensitive humor has a function. The Democrats have stifled a necessary emotional outlet by proclaiming everything racist.

And people are sick of it.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Other than her being a bumbling idiot, her greatest mistake was picking Walz. I remember thinking why on earth would she pick him. I was scared to death it was going to be Shapiro. They probably wouldn't won Pa if she picked him.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

Other than her being a bumbling idiot, her greatest mistake was picking Walz. I remember thinking why on earth would she pick him. I was scared to death it was going to be Shapiro. They probably wouldn't won Pa if she picked him.


If they had done this smartly, you are likely looking at Shapiro as the next POTUS. Thankfully, their anti-Semitism got the better of them.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Silent For Too Long said:

beanbean said:

LMAO I remember dems talking about what an awesome pick Walz was. Going to appeal to the average Joe.


I distinctly remember Barbacoa Taco saying "cope harder" when we were trashing it.

Haven't seen that dude post in weeks.
Or BigFred, or Agjacent. Probably thinking up new user names.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.