"Too well spoken"
Huh?
Huh?
Aggie Therapist said:
"Too well spoken"
Huh?
Aggie Therapist said:
I'm all for treating Vets with non big pharna alternatives
Aggie Therapist said:
"Too well spoken"
Huh?
I would imagine that the more important person in the process is Dan Patrick.FIDO*98* said:Aggie Therapist said:
Does anyone know Abbott's stance
He'll stick his finger in the wind just like every other decision and come out on the side of donors. Will probably use the religious Right to kill it so the money keeps flowing.
And if it's anything like how he feels about hemp, this will go nowhereDannyDuberstein said:
Yep, when it comes to Texas specifically, Dan Patrick is the biggest obstacle
Aggie Therapist said:
Awww, so kind of like self-conscious so they almost over do it.
Watched this last night and I got more of that vibe from Rick Perry regarding all of this. It's a fascinating topic that I was completely unaware of but I just couldn't help but think Perry has to be in this for himself in some greater capacity.DannyDuberstein said:Aggie Therapist said:
"Too well spoken"
Huh?
smooth to the point of being a bit southern televangelist-ish. Not the fiery type but very rehearsed
BusterAg said:
I know quite a bit about this subject:
1) Ibogaine is in a class of psychedelics that are similar to psilocybin (magic mushrooms), LSD, ayahuasca, and DMT. They create a serotonin bath for your brain that does two things: 1) creates hallucinations; and, more importantly, 2) helps your brain literally re-wire through neuroplasticity. David Eagleman and Jordon Peterson touch on psychedelics and neuroplasticity a bit, Dr. Eagleman is one of the world's most renowned neurologists. Huberman Labs goes over psychedelics and neuroplasticity very well too. These psychedelic medicines have shown tremendous promise in the recovery from addiction, depression, and PTSD. Johns Hopkins performed the most well know and impactful clinical trial, which has been replicated by entities such as the Mayo clinic, Berkely, and others. The data from these trials is amazing.
2) Ibogaine has one major advantage and one major drawback compared to other medicines in this class. For some reason, it greatly interrupts the body's opium withdrawal process, reducing the amount of time you are dope sick from something like a month to something like 3 to 4 days. That is a HUGE advantage, because being dope sick is one of the most difficult challenges of recovering from opioids like heroin and fentanyl. The disadvantage for Ibogaine is that it can cause blood pressure spikes, which can be dangerous, especially if the patient is going through alcohol withdrawal as well, which can exasperate blood pressure spikes.
3) Ibogaine is fairly new for medical treatment, so it is well positioned to be developed by big pharma. There is enough novelty that there is likely some intellectual property that can be attached to the drug so that generics will not be available for a decade or so after FDA approval. It is not something that you take as an ongoing therapy. It is a cure, not an ongoing treatment. Think of it as chemotherapy for brain mis-wiring diseases.
4) Getting Ibogaine through the FDA approval process will greatly facilitate the opportunity to have other psychedelics make it through the FDA process, and get off the Schedule I list. Pharma might be able to bribe the FDA into slowing things down, but, at some point, no politician wants to be the face of the political movement to ban drugs that are proven to help with PTSD and opioid addiction. Not everyone can take Ibogaine. Pretty much anyone can take psilocybin, LSD or DMT. They are chemically very safe, and not chemically addictive. You just have to have a babysitter with you to make sure you don't convince yourself that you are superman and can fly out of a window.
This is all fantastic news, and I am very thankful that Perry put some weight behind it. The bill that passed through the Texas legislature is a $ for $ match of up to $50 million for clinical trials on Ibogaine for pretty much any treatment. I will be following this closely and watching where the money goes. Hopefully the execution is as good as the planning.
V8Aggie said:
Should also note that unlike magic mushrooms, etc… ibogaine is not a recreational drug. The experience is said to be pretty damn awful but worth it in the end.
BusterAg said:V8Aggie said:
Should also note that unlike magic mushrooms, etc… ibogaine is not a recreational drug. The experience is said to be pretty damn awful but worth it in the end.
The hallucinogenic state caused by Ibogaine is the same physical change that your brain goes through on any typical psychedelic drug, including psylocibin, LSD, DMT. The brain gets a giant serotonin bath, and parts of your brain that do not normally talk to eachother in a regular state start to connect and react to eachother. The sense of "oneness with the universe" is clich, but the best way to describe the warm emotional feeling that a helpful trip can create.
To be fair, ayahuasca is supposed to be much more harsh, in that the physical digestive systems are often horrible.
But, not many people take ayahuasca for a fun Friday night, either.
Again, the other major side-effect of this drug CAN be huge blood pressure spikes, which have to be monitored.
V8Aggie said:BusterAg said:V8Aggie said:
Should also note that unlike magic mushrooms, etc… ibogaine is not a recreational drug. The experience is said to be pretty damn awful but worth it in the end.
The hallucinogenic state caused by Ibogaine is the same physical change that your brain goes through on any typical psychedelic drug, including psylocibin, LSD, DMT. The brain gets a giant serotonin bath, and parts of your brain that do not normally talk to eachother in a regular state start to connect and react to eachother. The sense of "oneness with the universe" is clich, but the best way to describe the warm emotional feeling that a helpful trip can create.
To be fair, ayahuasca is supposed to be much more harsh, in that the physical digestive systems are often horrible.
But, not many people take ayahuasca for a fun Friday night, either.
Again, the other major side-effect of this drug CAN be huge blood pressure spikes, which have to be monitored.
I'm just stating what folks who have undergone the treatment have said. It's not something that is fun or that they'd want to do again unless necessary.
Just trying to get ahead of the folks that are going to screech about it being on the streets, blah blah blah.
Yes you should only take it while under direct physician supervision.
Goose06 said:
What kind of data is there on its effectiveness reversing the impacts from diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and dementia?