Ohio's proposed "conception begins at erection" act

3,781 Views | 42 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by BonfireNerd04
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2025/02/10/ohio-democratic-lawmakers-propose-contraception-begins-at-erection-act/

Saw a reference to this in the funny political tweets thread, decided to see if it was satire. It is not.

Quote:

In between performing multiple surgeries as an OBGYN Friday, the Democrat explained that she wants to start regulating men's reproductive health care.

"If you're going to penalize someone for an unwanted pregnancy, why not penalize the person who is also responsible for the pregnancy?" she said.

She introduced legislation that would make it a felony for men to "discharge semen without the intent to fertilize."

Somani and state Rep. Tristan Rader, D-Lakewood, joined forces to propose a bill nicknamed "Conception Begins at Erection Act."
Of course this is proposed by Democrats

I'll give Somani credit, it's a terrific PR move and ensures she'll be re-elected. The women will love her for this.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
her brother is gonna be big mad.
Kvetch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All for it when you do the same for ovulating without conceiving. /sarcasm

The fact that democrats don't understand the basic science behind human development and lap up this dumb **** tells you everything you need to know about them. And no, it is not some poignant commentary on the absurdity of the pro life position. It's an outgrowth of the absurdity and evil of the pro abortion position.
Muktheduck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3/10 troll job. Better than the left usually can muster up but still impotent compared to the man in the oval office
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

discharge semen without the intent to fertilize."


So this law would encourage rape. I mean if you say every time a guy gets an erection, he needs to discharge semen with intent to fertilize, you're saying you want a law that makes men felons for not raping somebody. It also makes the entire gay male community felons by definition.
Maybe Next Year
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why is this so hard to understand?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Quote:

discharge semen without the intent to fertilize."


So this law would encourage rape. I mean if you say every time a guy gets an erection, he needs to discharge semen with intent to fertilize, you're saying you want a law that makes men felons for not raping somebody. It also makes the entire gay male community felons by definition.
Probably an exception for the alphabet soup crowd.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somani and Rader, two feminazis (as Rush would call them) who think they're so clever.

They're about as clever as a brick.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kvetch said:

All for it when you do the same for ovulating without conceiving. /sarcasm

The fact that democrats don't understand the basic science behind human development and lap up this dumb **** tells you everything you need to know about them. And no, it is not some poignant commentary on the absurdity of the pro life position. It's an outgrowth of the absurdity and evil of the pro abortion position.
I blame the Ohio media for not getting her laughed out of the room.

"Will repeat offenders be forced to walk around wearing one white glove?"

"With your 'defund the police' stance, who exactly do you expect to enforce this legislation?"

"Will people who act to completion be referred to a 'serial killers'?

"The wind is blowing today. How many teenage boys will be arrested as a result?"

So much comedy gold to be mined at her expense.....

AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the left every time they think they have a point

You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nothing but performative theatrics from an insane progressive.
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some libtard in Oklahoma tried something like this a number of years ago. Al Madrigal had a hilarious bit on the Daily Show about it.
CrockerCock00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe her true aim is to make it illegal to have to give her man oral.

Also criminalizes anyone that has a wet dream.
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Might as well call it the Anti-Gay Act, buncha homophobes!!!

I hope the alphabet mafia goes after them!!

AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you're going to try to make a point, with a silly bill...at least make it make sense.

Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they're just going to hand Christian nationalists a win, the Republicans in Ohio should pass it. It would be an all time greatest self own by liberals in the history of the world to accidentally introduce a bill that's in perfect keeping with Catholic moral teaching.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is their a wet dream carve out in their bill?
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BTKAG97 said:

Is their a wet dream carve out in their bill?

aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RikkiTikkaTagem said:

Quote:

discharge semen without the intent to fertilize."


So this law would encourage rape. I mean if you say every time a guy gets an erection, he needs to discharge semen with intent to fertilize, you're saying you want a law that makes men felons for not raping somebody. It also makes the entire gay male community felons by definition.
This is an excellent point.

Did anyone point it out on X ?

Democrats are looking to lock up all the gays!
aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They carved out an exception for gays apparently, which I would think they CANNOT do under equal protections act.

Quote:

There are some exceptions, such as when protection or contraceptions are used during sex. It also wouldn't apply when an individual is masturbating, donating sperm, or if the intercourse takes place between members of the LGBTQ+ community and thus doesn't "produce ova."

So what this would apply to is sex without a condom and without actually wanting to procreate. This felony would cost violators thousands of dollars, with a max of $10,000 per discharge.
IANAL, but if the bill is filed, could the filer have a class action law suit from straight men?

The women 'produce ova' so that has nothing to do with the male. So it would only be a crime for unprotected sex with a woman with ovaries or functioning ovaries? The male has no control over that whether or not ova is produced.

Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

If they're just going to hand Christian nationalists a win, the Republicans in Ohio should pass it. It would be an all time greatest self own by liberals in the history of the world to accidentally introduce a bill that's in perfect keeping with Catholic moral teaching.
And, as Rikki stated, now we really can round up all the gays and put them in camps. Well, the dudes at least. Wonder how old Hogg would hold up in Coleman?
Dad-O-Lot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It has several exceptions carved out:

Quote:

There are some exceptions, such as when protection or contraceptions are used during sex. It also wouldn't apply when an individual is masturbating, donating sperm, or if the intercourse takes place between members of the LGBTQ+ community and thus doesn't "produce ova."

So I wonder what the man's response could be to a partner that lies about being "on the pill"?

Also, since all contraception has a failure rate, how would you "prove" you used a condom? Would you need to keep it like a receipt?

Another option is to not have sex unless you are willing to raise a resulting child.
People of integrity expect to be believed, when they're not, they let time prove them right.
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I almost want them to pass the bill just to prove a point.

The Catholics are right - removing the procreative possibilities of the sexual act has been detrimental to society.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you can't have sex with post menopausal women?
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

So you can't have sex with post menopausal women?
aggiez03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheEternalOptimist said:

I almost want them to pass the bill just to prove a point.

The Catholics are right - removing the procreative possibilities of the sexual act has been detrimental to society.

Republicans should add one minor tweek...


Quote:

She introduced legislation that would make it a felony for men to "discharge semen without the intent to fertilize UNLESS MARRIED'


and then pass it.

Let the Liberals OWN that bill....

CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is going to be tough on all the soy boys who sit around watching pron and never come within a 100 yards of a girl.
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

So you can't have sex with post menopausal women?


Or a woman with a hysterectomy or a tubal ligation.
Vitani
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funny enough, IANAL describes the issue pretty well.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Ohio's proposed "conception begins at erection" act

Did all democrats flunk biology 101. First they can't define what a women is, next they think someone with an XY chromosome is a women and now this.
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
The Legally Blonde defense attempted to be put into law
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What about the "When You Spread Those Legs to Expose Those Eggs Act"?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Dr. Nefario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.” -Abraham Lincoln

“Veganism is like communism. They’re both fine… unless you like food.”
taxpreparer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I pity those poor teenaged boys who get prosecuted for their morning wood.
Buck Turgidson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What if you are a woman but have a ***** but you are also a lesbian?
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.