You apparently fall into the willfully ignorant category, because you've ignored numerous posts where I literally agkaggie08 said:Ag_SGT said:No, and I've said as much numerous time dumb ****gkaggie08 said:Ag_SGT said:The answer to your question is no, folks with a four year contract that get by with out an injury do not receive a retirement checkgkaggie08 said:Ag_SGT said:If the four year contract results in a lifetime injury, yes. So far as your second point about property taxes, I'm pretty indifferent on the subjectQuote:
Do you think a 4 year contract should give you a retirement package? If you did a TOD in a combat zone, do you believe you should be exempt from income taxes?
My second point was income tax, not property. I've already said multiple times that injury, quality of life degradation, and decreased life expectancy due to service should be compensated.
My question about a 4 year contract was if you served 4 years, unscathed, do you deserve a retirement package? There hasn't been a veteran entitlement/program y'all have objected to yet, just seeing if you would object to this absurd theoretical
No **** Sherlock, do you think they deserve it?
You haven't said it numerous times, this is actually the first time in this thread that you have said no to a proposed veteran benefit
Responded to you about federal employment
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin