It was fake.

You guys there isn't some list somewhere of everyone who did stuff with Epstein's girls and what they did. There never was. They can't release it because it doesn't exist.

Loquacious Lunchbox said:

---

You guys there isn't some list somewhere of everyone who did stuff with Epstein's girls and what they did. There never was. They can't release it because it doesn't exist.

---

Duh.

I don't think that's true though. I think it is known who was used in the Epstein honeypot operations. I also think only a few people know the full scope, within the US government (I think the Israeli's know more).

EPSTEIN LIST: There is NO list. Only the DOJ prosecutor, Maureen Comey (James Comey’s daughter) who handled BOTH the Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein cases knows EXACTLY who the girls were trafficked to. She declined to name much less prosecute even one of the men. If you… pic.twitter.com/2aIsaU7j2X

— @amuse (@amuse) February 28, 2025

Will see if more disclosures are forced.

Seems like a bunch of BS to me. I won't believe things are really changing in our federal government until there is full disclosure to the public, heads roll, and high profile people are prosecuted. But that won't happen it never does. It's more likely there will be confidential payoffs and deals so the big fish go free. Maybe some prosecution of low level schmucks that can't implicate the big fish. There's probably more crime and shady dealings that occur in our federal government than in any organization on earth.

Whaler said:

---

Seems like a bunch of BS to me. I won't believe things are really changing in our federal government until there is full disclosure to the public, heads roll, and high profile people are prosecuted. But that won't happen it never does. It's more likely there will be confidential payoffs and deals so the big fish go free. Maybe some prosecution of low level schmucks that can't implicate the big fish. There's probably more crime and shady dealings that occur in our federal government than in any organization on earth.

---

Figured this out 20 years ago. Once you stop being a sheep for either side thinking "This president will do what they say!" , Mentality it all comes to light. Watching both sides fight with each other like 2 cats in heat in a burlap sack is entertaining

So it's a shocker that she was put into SDNY in 2015, a year before Trump was even elected?

wanted to see the Podestas get what they deserve. Sickos. but it looks like they and many more will slide.
Garbage celebrity culture. blackmail culture.

No justice for all the kids. Our intel agencies have been sacrificing children in a dozen different ways for decades. Can't be a nation under God with all that outstanding.

Another scum bag up in NY who should not have a job, let alone a security clearance still.

He was promoted to Assistant Director by Chris Wray in Sept 2024. Long time agent in NY and Newark. Must be quite the Biden loyalist. As soon as he sent that email he should have been fired. Bad enough if one defies the boss but to instruct his entire office to do so is beyond…

— Free To Speak (@FreeToSpeak71) February 28, 2025

the tweet says its a shock she was put in office right before Trump came into office.

and its not shocking at all she would be on all those case. all but one is sex-crime related. offices generally put the same people on similar cases like that. Comey wasnt' lead on the epstein case and isn't even on PACER for the edwards case. she's the seventh lawyer listed on the diddy pleadings. "golden chilld"?

now, as for not trusting her, thats completely justified.

but trying to claim its "Shocking" she got the postition a year before Trump was elected or that she worked on high profile sex cases is just trying to create sensationalism.

Maybe it was assumed GCF was going to be prez and that's why she was assigned in 2015. Lord knows after every thing Hillary did she was going to need some help. Maybe even a favor to Jim to help out his daughter.

Kinda feels like C3 is opening himself up for a defamation suit here.......

Hope he/they have some evidence to back those statements up.

Loquacious Lunchbox said:

---

You guys there isn't some list somewhere of everyone who did stuff with Epstein's girls and what they did. There never was. They can't release it because it doesn't exist.

---

there are case files with loads more information than the few flight logs that have already been out in the public realm. there has to be transcriptions from depositions and witness testimonies. plus, maybe it's all been destroyed already, but surveillance data existed at some point. there isn't a straight up black book client "list", but there corroborating evidence against the evil ****s that are getting away with their crimes.

it is sickening to know the circumstantial evidence of what we know went on with Epstein's clients, the powerful people we know were heavily associated with Epstein, including being listed on flight logs to the island, and yet all of them can just simply deny it because the feds won't take it any further to protect CIA assets.

I think it's the same withing with the corrupt as F Biden family- the FBI intentionally thwarted an IRS investigation and DOJ intentionally stalled another until statute of limitations ran out for the Bidens' corruption, I think because they were used as intel assets overseas.

BMX Bandit said:

---

the tweet says its a shock she was put in office right before Trump came into office.

and its not shocking at all she would be on all those case. all but one is sex-crime related. offices generally put the same people on similar cases like that. Comey wasnt' lead on the epstein case and isn't even on PACER for the edwards case. she's the seventh lawyer listed on the diddy pleadings. "golden chilld"?

now, as for not trusting her, thats completely justified.

but trying to claim its "Shocking" she got the postition a year before Trump was elected or that she worked on high profile sex cases is just trying to create sensationalism.

---

That's because you are being hyper-literal as usual with a tweet/message. The shocking thing is that she is supposedly involved with all of those cases, and yes that is a big deal for what was, over the past 10 years, a junior prosecutor at one USA office. The politics of the DoJ SDNY office are highly problematic, as is the FBI field office up there, not just in Trump-related investigations/charges/staff going to NYC-Bragg office etc.

They've put obvious partisans on cases and filings they shouldn't have, have concealed information from HQ, and mouthed off repeatedly about Trump/Bondi/Bove, largely dismissing the authority of DoJ HQ over the office, from the leadership in NY. You can hand waive and claim it's not true based on some procedural matters all you want, but it is a simple truth.

The SDNY office was a partner in organized crime for far too long. That's hopefully going to end now.

Wow -- this is a big deal for those of us who were dealing with these groups back in the 90s after the killing of DEA Agent Kiki Camarena.

Before his posting in Mexico, Camarena was assigned to the DEA Office in Fresno. His murder took place prior to my starting work for DOJ… https://t.co/tt1IigQ4rR

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) February 28, 2025

Prosperdick said:

---

What was USAID… among other things it was mainly a CIA cutout to install regime change around the world.

One way to facilitate regime change is from good old fashioned blackmail or Kompromat.

---

That's how it started. Later it became a well developed organization which turned its tools and methods on the American people which they politically disagreed with. I'll give them credit for being devious and clever enough to get the American people to pay for their destruction.

If Trump does nothing else he must destroy the NGO's.

reading the words of the tweet is not being "hyper literal". you are trying to twist what the tweeter said because on its faces its just dumb.

and again, there is nothing "Shocking" about Comey getting a job in SDNY or working similar type cases. her dad was FBI director! You think they weren't lining up to hire her?

the tweeter is trying for sensationalism. it worked. they know most people will just take it at as true even though several claims are easily disproved.

now, what you say about SDNY is all true. it has tried to be "independent" from even the DC DoJ, which has only led to the festering problems.

So as far as we know there has been no activity at FBI in NY or did I miss something?

From Jeff Childers' substack:

Here is a reality that we all must confront. The forces arrayed against any disclosure of Epstein's client list include the most powerful humans who have ever lived. It probably includes influential billionaires, established politicians, judges, lawyers, scientists, generals, kings, activists, mobsters, and possibly reptilians and the guy who prunes the White House rose bushes. Disclosure is no small thing. If it ever happens and I mean 'if' it will be the greatest political accomplishment in history.
To say the odds are stacked against disclosure is like saying handing a two-year-old a permanent marker is bound to cause mischief.
I don't say this to discourage you. It's just the size of the job. There's never been a bigger job. And the odds for success have never been worse. It is what it is.

So were the documents delivered by 8 or is Kash and Bondi walking people out the door?

From Jeff Childers' substack this morning:

The person that needs to be out in front of the people right now to explain this information release fiasco is Trump. Where the hell is he?

Rocky Rider said:

---

The person that needs to be out in front of the people right now to explain this information release fiasco is Trump. Where the hell is he?

---

Kicking Zelenskyy's butt and extracting rare minerals out of his ass.

infinity ag said:

---

Rocky Rider said:

---

The person that needs to be out in front of the people right now to explain this information release fiasco is Trump. Where the hell is he?

---

Kicking Zelenskyy's butt and extracting rare minerals out of his ass.

---

Mental image cannot be unseen. Thanks.

Maybe we can get an AI image of this process?

And Trump does not need to spend a minute on tabloid stories like Epstein. Do I want to see people helf responsible? Yes, but Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are more than capable without Trump.

But... I would bet hard money on Trump being asked on this and answering. With the previous guy he would never, ever answer a question as none of his chosen media would dare ask such a question.

Yall really think the SDNY or FBI in that office are just holding onto the "list" and keeping it secret? LOL

Any list was destroyed LONG ago!

Im Gipper said:

---

Yall really think the SDNY or FBI in that office are just holding onto the "list" and keeping it secret? LOL

Any list was destroyed LONG ago!

---

This is my thought as well. If they're bold enough to disregard the orders of the president, the FBI director, and the AG, then they're bold enough to destroy whatever documents they want. Treason.
Open rebellion!

He also mentioned Tim Pool's take. This is interesting and sounds plausible to me:

Quote:

---

Mega-podcaster Tim Pool is a pretty smart guy, which is one reason people enjoy his show. He's beginning to catch on to the way Trump 2.0 does things. He spoke to several of the influencers (he didn't say who) who were at the White House yesterday for a completely different reason. Tim said they reported that the binder event was impromptu, a surprise.

Pool speculated that the binder show was meant for the media not for us. Reporters took rolls of film of the influencers and the binders and everyone paid attention. It instantly became the world's top story at the speed of social media, which couldn't stop speculating about it.

Tim was right to suspect an ulterior motive.

If Pam Bondi wanted to set up a problem-response-solution giving Kash Patel justification for cleaning house in SDNY, this one-day media operation combined with her leaked letter was perfectly fit for purpose. Whatever Kash does next will forever be framed in the narrative garb of getting to the bottom of the Epstein coverup.

---

That Trump was meeting with PM Kier Starmer at the White House the same day is also very interesting.

Quote:

---

Let's chalk up what we do know about yesterday's events. At some point yesterday morning, just before Trump's meeting with Prime Minister Starmer, without prior notice, the White House rounded up a bunch of conservative influencers, handed them fake Epstein binders, paraded them before the rabid corporate press, and told them not to talk about any of it until after the meeting with Starmer was done.

Those are all facts.

You are probably wondering, what connects Starmer, Trump, and Epstein? I'll tell you. One of Epstein's highest-profile buddies was Prince Andrew. The men go way back. Andrew was a frequent Epstein visitor and plane-flier. Even after Epstein's 2010 conviction for sex crimes, Andrew was photographed strolling with the mystery man in Central Park.

Doing the job the DOJ should have done, former sex-slave Virginia Guiffre sued Andrews, accusing the Prince of r-ping her over and over, as Epstein and Maxwell repeatedly trafficked her to his Royal highness, in Maxwell's London townhouse, Epstein's New York Mansion, and on Little St. James Island.

Andrew denied all guilt but settled with Virgina out of court for $12 million dollars. (Ahem. "Hush money.")

The public backlash led to a few slaps on the wrist. Andrew stepped down from his royal duties. The Queen stripped his military titles. And he was, reportedly, excluded from future public royal events. It shows the Royals knew they had a problem.

If Virginia Giuffre's allegations against Prince Andrew were conclusively confirmedsay through hard evidence like videos, emails, or unsealed testimoniesit would be devastating for both Andrew personally and for the British Royal Family as an institution. Not inconceivably, it could shatter the British government, sending Starmer and his entire party to a political Siberian gulag.

---

Hmmmm. Makes one think this might not have been a gaffe by Bondi after all. Trump has a score to settle with the British deep state too.

I don't exactly buy this theory but I read a few days ago that Charles did just invite Trump to an "unprecedented" second state visit.

Quote:

---

Makes one think this might not have been a gaffe by Bondi after all.

---

Thats wishcasting.

Bondi and others like Habba making this out to be a huge deal screwed up in doing so. There is no spinning that.

She should have just said "This is the first of many batches of documents."

Rockdoc said:

---

Never over promise and under deliver.

---

I am pretty sure when it comes to politics and the government, this concept does not apply. Doubly so when media is involved.

Same for the used car salesman, the pharmaceutical sales rep and the guy you hired to remodel your bathroom.

But if people have feedback, don't be shy:

Quote:

---

U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington DC 20530

Contact the Department
Phone: 202-514-2000
TTY/TDD: 800-877-8339

---