The female patrol officer experiment is an utter failure. Only men should be in this occupation. It ruined every agency that I worked for.

Why did she just sit there?

Weren't we just told by Pennsylvania State Senator Lindsey Williams that women were just as strong as men and could do anything a man could do?

Tom Fox said:

---

The female patrol officer experiment is an utter failure. Only men should be in this occupation. It ruined every agency that I worked for.

---

Do you think that if there weren't a shortage of employees in that field (law enforcement), like there is in every area of the workforce in this country, that there'd be fewer women hired into these positions?

Muy said:

---

YellAg2004 said:

---

Mayor West said:

---

Or maybe it wasn't a race thing, but a female officer who knew she couldn't handle anyone and would only become the next victim without deadly force

---

The kick to the guy's head justifies the use of deadly force.

---

Okay Wyatt Earp. No she probably shouldn't be a police officer, but at that moment, pretending on the internet we'd be Billy Badass when we have no idea how terrified she was is simply fake.

---

But she is/was a police officer. It is not unreasonable for us to expect her to act like one.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

The female patrol officer experiment is an utter failure. Only men should be in this occupation. It ruined every agency that I worked for.

---

Do you think that if there weren't a shortage of employees in that field (law enforcement), like there is in every area of the workforce in this country, that there'd be fewer women hired into these positions?

---

The opposite. When they started forcing females to be a significant percentage on new hires in the 1990s, there were still dozens of qualified male applicants for every police vacancy. Sometimes 100 to 1.

Those females received preference and underperformed but were still promoted to increase the number of females in management. That began the pussification of law enforcement.

It also created tons of office politics, romances, and strife that did not exist before.

And they are biologically just incapable of doing the job which most of the time involves either the threat or use of physical force against young males.

Our refusal to acknowledge biology has been a great detriment to this nation.

I mean how ridiculous have we gotten in the USA beat patrol for cops was not meant for women. That woman should be at home raising kids thats how nature intended.

This was attempted murder. She should have gotten out and put lead into the perps.

Tom Fox said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

The female patrol officer experiment is an utter failure. Only men should be in this occupation. It ruined every agency that I worked for.

---

Do you think that if there weren't a shortage of employees in that field (law enforcement), like there is in every area of the workforce in this country, that there'd be fewer women hired into these positions?

---

The opposite. When they started forcing females to be a significant percentage on new hires in the 1990s, there were still dozens of qualified male applicants for every police vacancy. Sometimes 100 to 1.

Those females received preference and underperformed but were still promoted to increase the number of females in management. That began the pussification of law enforcement.

It also created tons of office politics, romances, and strife that did not exist before.

And they are biologically just incapable of doing the job which most of the time involves either the threat or use of physical force against young males.

Our refusal to acknowledge biology has been a great detriment to this nation.

---

Thanks for the history lesson, and I can't argue with you because, biologically speaking, there is no comparison. You'd think, though, that having a firearm at their disposal, the women would at least attempt to interfere as often as a man would, the firearm being an equalizer of sorts.

I will say that of my buddies in BP, a couple are females, and even the one who is more muscular and aggressive still calls on her male counterparts in situations where a single male may be more than enough to handle the same situation. To me, that would be considered an area of waste since additional resources (the male officers) are needed to be pulled away from their duties to help a female who can't perform hers adequately.

What would your thoughts be on DOGE having women in BP given the same treatment the other federal employees Elon fired in an effort to save money and have them replaced with more capable employees (them being all male)?

No Spin Ag said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Tom Fox said:

---

The female patrol officer experiment is an utter failure. Only men should be in this occupation. It ruined every agency that I worked for.

---

Do you think that if there weren't a shortage of employees in that field (law enforcement), like there is in every area of the workforce in this country, that there'd be fewer women hired into these positions?

---

The opposite. When they started forcing females to be a significant percentage on new hires in the 1990s, there were still dozens of qualified male applicants for every police vacancy. Sometimes 100 to 1.

Those females received preference and underperformed but were still promoted to increase the number of females in management. That began the pussification of law enforcement.

It also created tons of office politics, romances, and strife that did not exist before.

And they are biologically just incapable of doing the job which most of the time involves either the threat or use of physical force against young males.

Our refusal to acknowledge biology has been a great detriment to this nation.

---

Thanks for the history lesson, and I can't argue with you because, biologically speaking, there is no comparison. You'd think, though, that having a firearm at their disposal, the women would at least attempt to interfere as often as a man would, the firearm being an equalizer of sorts.

I will say that of my buddies in BP, a couple are females, and even the one who is more muscular and aggressive still calls on her male counterparts in situations where a single male may be more than enough to handle the same situation. To me, that would be considered an area of waste since additional resources (the male officers) are needed to be pulled away from their duties to help a female who can't perform hers adequately.

What would your thoughts be on DOGE having women in BP given the same treatment the other federal employees Elon fired in an effort to save money and have them replaced with more capable employees (them being all male)?

---

It would never be possible. It is virtually impossible to fire a career fed employee. I was one. If I could wish snap every chick out of law enforcement, it would be an instant improvement.

Question from a layman...why are non-lethal means not used more? Bean bag rounds, rubber baton rounds, pepper rounds, etc?

japantiger said:

---

Question from a layman...why are non-lethal means not used more? Bean bag rounds, rubber baton rounds, pepper rounds, etc?

---

Not a LEO, but maybe because those non-lethal means accomplish nothing more than just pissing them off & giving them a justification to do whatever (in their own twisted way of thinking)?