Former Rep. Curt Weldon on Tucker about 9/11

3,483 Views | 43 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by fullback44
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG










Is this guy a nut? I don't know anything about him but I'm almost done listening to the full interview and he seems genuine.

I've never, ever bought into 9/11 conspiracy theories other than we could have done better to prevent it, and it gave us a good excuse to go to war in the Middle East.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"I have proof!"

"Gonna be huge!"

We hear that all the time and in the end, it always turns out to be nothing.

And since it is Tucker, it is most likely bull***** He's turned into an tabloid huckster, but he knows his audience well and keeps feeding them an endless stream of crap.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This has been my recent opinion on Tucker as well, but I wanted to at least listen to see what this guy had to say.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tucker C needs to get beyong just digging up the latest underground right wing conspiracy theories from the web and then feeding them confirmation bias by addressing only parts of the issue or he will become the right wing version of Geraldo Rivera.
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Hagen95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

"I have proof!"

"Gonna be huge!"

We hear that all the time and in the end, it always turns out to be nothing.

And since it is Tucker, it is most likely bull***** He's turned into an tabloid huckster, but he knows his audience well and keeps feeding them an endless stream of crap.
Next thing he's gonna find is Jimmy Hoffa's vault.
Wes97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And not even one person addresses the issues this former Congressman brought up. All "he is nuts and just a conspiracy" talk. Just about what you can expect from this board.
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wes97 said:

And not even one person addresses the issues this former Congressman brought up. All "he is nuts and just a conspiracy" talk. Just about what you can expect from this board.
To be fair, the videos are just claims made by a guy who admittedly, sounds a little hokey.

Until he actually shows the proof, I'm not sure what to address. Everything he's saying sounds plausible, and at the same time sounds salacious; but it's just random accusations at this point.

When claims like this are made, people need to publish/distribute the proof, and then talk about it. When you talk about it first, and make the claim 'you have to believe me, I have proof!'....99/100 times we never see the proof.


All that to say, what about the vids did you want to discuss? It is definitely interesting stuff, if true.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tucker sucks now.

90% of the time he has on nut jobs and conspiracy theorists just so he can generate headlines like these in an attempt to draw clicks and listens.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
9/11, chemtrails, and covid jabs lethality

three very interesting topics with many people on both sides. i always find this super fascinating because there is some questions on all three that should be entertained. there are people on one side that will not entertain the possibility of the official narrative being false and the other side is 100% convinced something is up on all three events.

just fascinating to me how two sides can see such polar opposite sides of the same coin.
HoustonAg9999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wes97 said:

And not even one person addresses the issues this former Congressman brought up. All "he is nuts and just a conspiracy" talk. Just about what you can expect from this board.
Yep 2nd post attacked Tucker immediately par for the course around here, everyone is a grifter and huckster,
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nothing will come of this. Just like the Epstein list, UFOs, and JFK files.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Nope. A vulnerable design, uncontrolled fire with no water to fight it, inner structure collaped, quickly followed by the exterior. Why would it be necessary to demolish 7? Were 1 and 2 not enough?
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Kraken said:

BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Nope. A vulnerable design, uncontrolled fire with no water to fight it, inner structure collaped, quickly followed by the exterior. Why would it be necessary to demolish 7? Were 1 and 2 not enough?


Because of the joos, or something.

You're going to be released....





.....soon!!!!!1
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Kraken said:

BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Nope. A vulnerable design, uncontrolled fire with no water to fight it, inner structure collaped, quickly followed by the exterior. Why would it be necessary to demolish 7? Were 1 and 2 not enough?
The "buildings were demo'd with controlled explosion" crowd will never address how they planted and wired 1,000's of pounds of explosives in three occupied buildings and no one noticed.

If you've ever been somewhat in the room when a team is planning to demo a building, and I have, it takes months of work to weaken the structure, remove a bunch of materials and miles of wires to implode a building. EVERYONE IN THE BUILDING WOULD NOTICE the work being done.
Bazooka Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Curious how many objectors on this thread actually listened to the podcast in question.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.


All you have to do is look into it.

ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

The Kraken said:

BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Nope. A vulnerable design, uncontrolled fire with no water to fight it, inner structure collaped, quickly followed by the exterior. Why would it be necessary to demolish 7? Were 1 and 2 not enough?
The "buildings were demo'd with controlled explosion" crowd will never address how they planted and wired 1,000's of pounds of explosives in three occupied buildings and no one noticed.

If you've ever been somewhat in the room when a team is planning to demo a building, and I have, it takes months of work to weaken the structure, remove a bunch of materials and miles of wires to implode a building. EVERYONE IN THE BUILDING WOULD NOTICE the work being done.


Wired tons of explosives in a building and then rammed exploding jets full of fuel into it at the exact right places. Then let them burn freely for a while before pulling the plug. So ridiculous you have to very simple to believe that.
donkeykick90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul
Clear Eyes. Full Heart. Might Lose
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
great vid.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Tell me you know nothing about 9/11 without telling me you know nothing about 9/11
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never, ever engage a 9/11 truther.
It's an exercise in futility.
They've got a reply/answer to EVERYTHING. Literally everything. No matter how much logic you hit them with (e.g. the Bldg 7 collapse), they've always got another level of conspiracy to retreat and assign it to.
Until finally they just attribute your unwillingness to buy in to you being either a sheep or part of the conspiracy.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
donkeykick90 said:

The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul
Yes, something was definitely foul.

Namely 2 747 jets travelling at approximately 380-450 knots with a weight of just over 1mm lbs and approximately 100,000 gallons of Jet A plowing into stationary skyscrapers not designed for massive side impact and shock loads because they were hijacked by a bunch of jihadi nut jobs who wanted to kill Americans on their way to their 72 goats in whatever they call heaven.

That is what was foul.

ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
donkeykick90 said:

The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul


Mossad has agents in every major city around the world, just like us. There was a major terror attack. After the plane hit the building (not before), they went to a vantage point to film. They were dancing because they knew this would lead to them getting more support to fight terrorists who try to murder them in their country every single day.

Mossad had given us plenty of warning a major attack was coming. It fell on def ears.

Osama's biggest enemy (and our greatest ally) in Afghanistan Ahmad Massoud had also given us warnings a major attack was coming. Again, nothing was done. Osama had him assassinated the day before 9/11, knowing we'd invade and start his planned holy war.

There had been lots of warnings and warning signs a major terror attack was coming. The twin terrors were a known target. Insurance policy is not surprising.

Who knows what the explosions were but there's a million possibilities. Backdrafts, floors falling, air being compressed as the floors fell, etc.

No disrespect to your uncle, but most self proclaimed outdoorsman can't tell the difference between a firework and a gunshot, a water moccasin vs a water snake. I doubt your uncle heard any "explosions".

The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
donkeykick90 said:

The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul
The Israelis were indeed Mossad, but they were spying on Arabs and had no connection to 9/11. The "dancing" part is pure bunk.

The Rumsfeld part is false. He was quoted one year earlier (9/10/10) saying, "The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector," Rumsfeld said at one point. "But not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions."

We know exactly who the perpetrators of 9/11 were. Taking a few curiosities and saying something is foul is a huge stretch, and that's being conservative. Most of it is pure crap.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmellba99 said:

donkeykick90 said:

The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul
Yes, something was definitely foul.

Namely 2 747 jets travelling at approximately 380-450 knots with a weight of just over 1mm lbs and approximately 100,000 gallons of Jet A plowing into stationary skyscrapers not designed for massive side impact and shock loads because they were hijacked by a bunch of jihadi nut jobs who wanted to kill Americans on their way to their 72 goats in whatever they call heaven.

That is what was foul.


I mean at least get your facts correct if you're going to argue with a 9/11 truther.

The planes were 767's each with ~23,000 gallons of fuel capacity.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Key questions are:

Why are Patel and Bondi continuing to all this covering up?

Does Trump know? Why is he allowing it?

I'm Gipper
Duckhook
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Uh oh. BatSignal has just gone out to two notorious 9/11 Truthers on TexAgs.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Duckhook said:

Uh oh. BatSignal has just gone out to two notorious 9/11 Truthers on TexAgs.
one of them needs to turn in his engineering degree.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

The Kraken said:

BboroAg said:

The collapse of Building 7 should make everyone question the official story of 9/11.
Nope. A vulnerable design, uncontrolled fire with no water to fight it, inner structure collaped, quickly followed by the exterior. Why would it be necessary to demolish 7? Were 1 and 2 not enough?
The "buildings were demo'd with controlled explosion" crowd will never address how they planted and wired 1,000's of pounds of explosives in three occupied buildings and no one noticed.

If you've ever been somewhat in the room when a team is planning to demo a building, and I have, it takes months of work to weaken the structure, remove a bunch of materials and miles of wires to implode a building. EVERYONE IN THE BUILDING WOULD NOTICE the work being done.

Not to mention the fact that the initial collapse point in BOTH buildings (at least, the towers) was exactly where the impact was. If you look at the South Tower collapse video, you'll see one of the corners of the building had been starting to give way for several minutes. The aluminum of the plane fueled the hotter temps of the fire -- hell, you could see the "lava" flowing in several videos. That material wasn't from the buildings themselves and it sure wasn't planted there before the planes hit them.

The controlled demolition "theory" is plainly stupid.

Now, if people want to argue that it was "allowed" to happen (somewhat unlikely but not impossible -- more like incompetence) or there was a massive coverup and political run for cover afterwards, then yeah, let's have that discussion.
BankerFarmer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I do not believe the demo of buildings with explosives, however i do believe the CIA paying or blackmailing and helping the terrorists destroy the buildings as possible. Bush wanted his war and the oil/money. Most of the terrorists were said to be Saudis. Didn't go to war with them did we? Set up the foundations and money flow to there then back home. Then Hillary and her Russia and African deals. Then Biden and his Ukraine and China deals. After the last several years i do not trust any government agency. Its all about power and money. They all fight Trump because he is not one of them. Do I really think Trump is better? I'm not sure yet. Seems to be that he will not listen to the powers that be. They tried to take him down and didn't get it done. They fight him every step of the way. If he is genuine, does he have the power to truly stop it or will they simply crank it back up when he is gone? Maybe that is the reason he is so extreme with his ideas..... I personally believe 3/4 of congress is on the take. Just look at their worth when they go in and when they go out. Million and tens of millions richer...... Nothing will come of it. Why? To many on the take including the investigative agencies. They will only let you see or know what they want you to. And if guys/Whistleblowers come forward they are fired, charged with some fake crime, killed in an accident or a media leak about them being a secret extremist..... The evidence they have may be true but the money wont let it be. Extremely frustrating for a citizen that still believes in God and Country.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
9/11 v. Kennedy conspiracy nuts. Who's the most squirrely of the two?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If true it's even more clear how corrupt our government is/was.
But his style of talking/yelling was really grating.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BankerFarmer said:

I do not believe the demo of buildings with explosives, however i do believe the CIA paying or blackmailing and helping the terrorists destroy the buildings as possible. Bush wanted his war and the oil/money. Most of the terrorists were said to be Saudis. Didn't go to war with them did we? Set up the foundations and money flow to there then back home. Then Hillary and her Russia and African deals. Then Biden and his Ukraine and China deals. After the last several years i do not trust any government agency. Its all about power and money. They all fight Trump because he is not one of them. Do I really think Trump is better? I'm not sure yet. Seems to be that he will not listen to the powers that be. They tried to take him down and didn't get it done. They fight him every step of the way. If he is genuine, does he have the power to truly stop it or will they simply crank it back up when he is gone? Maybe that is the reason he is so extreme with his ideas..... I personally believe 3/4 of congress is on the take. Just look at their worth when they go in and when they go out. Million and tens of millions richer...... Nothing will come of it. Why? To many on the take including the investigative agencies. They will only let you see or know what they want you to. And if guys/Whistleblowers come forward they are fired, charged with some fake crime, killed in an accident or a media leak about them being a secret extremist..... The evidence they have may be true but the money wont let it be. Extremely frustrating for a citizen that still believes in God and Country.
I really don't think Bush did it for oil or money. I do think he came in with a mindset that Iraq was the bad player in the world going back to his daddy's role in the first gulf war. Once he had any sliver of ammunition that Iraq was involved we were on our way.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.