Former Rep. Curt Weldon on Tucker about 9/11

3,487 Views | 43 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by fullback44
milner79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Kraken said:



We know exactly who the perpetrators of 9/11 were. Taking a few curiosities and saying something is foul is a huge stretch, and that's being conservative. Most of it is pure crap.

User name checks out.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

Tucker C needs to get beyong just digging up the latest underground right wing conspiracy theories from the web and then feeding them confirmation bias by addressing only parts of the issue or he will become the right wing version of Geraldo Rivera.
He's making an absolute killing. He knows what sells.

whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael Ruppert. Interesting read...accurate or not.

Why boots on the ground in the ME was Dick Cheney and Geo. W's driving force and their need for a reason to sell it to the public?

Why were United and American airline's stocks "shorted" prior to 9/11?

What were the real estate economics associated with the Twin Towers prior to 9/11?
milner79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have not (may not) finished the whole interview, but Weldon damages his credibility by his approach: constantly yelling (I understand he is angry about his daughter's alleged treatment but simmer down), claiming he has names and information but not disclosing same (big red flag for me), bringing up how the feds can infect someone with a fast-spreading cancer and it happened to two of his associates but he can't prove it (what?).

He approaches the level of the pillow salesman. I want to listen to him and make informed opinions based on what he says, but he has to start from a platform of rational credibility first.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You pretty much summed up my thoughts too. It seems like there's a lot of truth to the things that he's saying, but I won't believe it until I see it brought out in full.

The sad part is, the guy could drop dead of a heart attack tomorrow and it will fuel the conspiracy theories even more, but the info won't be brought forward so the speculation will continue.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

9/11, chemtrails, and covid jabs lethality

three very interesting topics with many people on both sides. i always find this super fascinating because there is some questions on all three that should be entertained. there are people on one side that will not entertain the possibility of the official narrative being false and the other side is 100% convinced something is up on all three events.

just fascinating to me how two sides can see such polar opposite sides of the same coin.
That is because some people have a background in science and engineering and can understand the topic, while others are clueless of the facts and instead listen to whatever the latest podcast is that supports their vision, no matter how outlandish the science is.

I've run into this with Flat Earthers. When I point out their lack of hard data, they come back with "and who told you that". Their whole house of cards is built on who told them something instead of understanding the real data.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.amazon.com/Looming-Tower-Al-Qaeda-Road-11/dp/1400030846

Great book on the long road of events that led up to 9/11 including not only what was happening on the Al Queda side but also the CIA and FBI. Considered a go-to book on the topic that won the Pulitzer Prize.

The CIA and FBI knew A LOT of the pieces but internal turf wars meant the left hand didn't know what the right hand knew or vice-versa. nobody had all the puzzle pieces in time to stop the attack until was too late and internal bureaucracy and egos and so forth was largely to blame.

Highly recommend this book. You will learn a hell of a lot about the history behind Al Queda and what was going on at the CIA and FBI.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmellba99 said:

donkeykick90 said:

The Kraken said:

Absolutely. It's specialized work, the conspiracy nuts can never answer how and why a demolition contractor would accept the job and perfom the work in secret.
You should look into the Israelis that were arrested. They were caught with cameras set up recording the fall of the towers and were dancing. Years later discovered they were Mossad. Also curious as to why an insurance policy worth over $2 billion was taken out just before the attacks. Also curious as to why Donald Rumsfield on national TV September 10th could not account for $2.3 trillion dollars.

Did you know that after airspace was shut down only two flights were permitted. One was an emergency flight carrying anti venmo for a guy who had been bitten by a poisonous snake. The other was a private heading to Saudia Arabia.

Or maybe you should ask my uncle and his buddy of firefighters who were at ground 0 that day saying they all heard multiple explosions in the buildings.

All of these items should make you wonder if something else was at play. I'm not saying the US govt did it, or it was the Mossad. But something is definitely foul
Yes, something was definitely foul.

Namely 2 747 jets travelling at approximately 380-450 knots with a weight of just over 1mm lbs and approximately 100,000 gallons of Jet A plowing into stationary skyscrapers not designed for massive side impact and shock loads because they were hijacked by a bunch of jihadi nut jobs who wanted to kill Americans on their way to their 72 goats in whatever they call heaven.

That is what was foul.





Bro- 100,000 gallons of Jet A I'm rolling on the ground laughing, if a plane carried 100,000 gallons of fuel it be HUGE- standard 737s carry a max 8000 gallons, some of the bigger planes hold more but not 100k gallons
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.