DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

482,233 Views | 5737 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by AggieVictor10
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zachary Klement said:

Ag with kids said:

FWTXAg said:

flown-the-coop said:

Highly improbable, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility.

I have become much more convinced that the intelligence agencies allow certain things to happen and even facilitates things at times. I don't think they have proven very adept at orchestrating things.

With Epstein I think it's more of a useful idiot relationship, but I am open to being convinced of more.

With what I have previously seen on the Franklin Credit Union, I am decidedly unconvinced of a grand conspiracy.


You should ChatGPT the cliff notes for One Nation Under Blackmail Volume 2 - Whitney Webb
She cites all of her sources. You could also check-out Drop Site News who are reporting the facts pertaining to Epstein and his widespread connections for anyone who actually want to know what, not who, Epstein really was.

Epstein could get you in a room with the Queen of England, Putin, Clinton, Netanyahu, or any other world leader. He was not a patsy. That's why they are trying so hard to cover this up, the guy was a major cog in the geopolitical criminal enterprise.

Can you cite some EVIDENCE that he did this?

He was known to be close, personal friends with Prince Andrew. Prince Andrew is the only person other than Epstein and Maxwell who has faced actually ramifications of this.

Idk about Putin.

He was close friends with Clinton, that is very clear.

Ehud Barak and Epstein were close as well.

He was very clearly incredibly well connected and a person of strong influence.


Viginia Giuffre wrote that Ehud Barak severely beat her. Crazy that somebody speaking out against the former head of a foreign intelligence service stepped in front of a bus a couple months after saying she wasn't suicidal.

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know she didn't step in front of a bus. She was riding in a car that was hit by a bus and suffered (reportedly minor) injuries resulting in chronic pain months before she died.

She was also allegedly abused by her husband, allegedly beaten severely though he claimed she attacked him and he was able to get a restraining order against her and took custody of their kids, leading her to become emotionally unstable in the months prior to her death… per her family.

Really undermines your broader conspiracy theories when you are unwilling to get the basic facts straight.

Her family and all officials note there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding her suicide which occurred on her farm in Australia.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you're right, i had my facts messed up. Giuffre did commit suicide and stated that Barak abused her, I messed up on the mode/circumstances.

Point is Epstein did indeed have a relationship with Barak and there is testimony against him.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:


Very unreliable, both MTG and 60 Minutes.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

PaulsBunions said:



Very unreliable, both MTG and 60 Minutes.

Are there any politicians or news networks that are reliable?
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zachary Klement said:

techno-ag said:

PaulsBunions said:



Very unreliable, both MTG and 60 Minutes.

Are there any politicians or news networks that are reliable?

I've got, "No, for a gagillion, Alex."
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Does not look reliable. Includes Hitler, Nixon and Saddam Hussein, but no mention of Jesus, the prophet Muhammad nor the Tooth Fairy.

Likely unreliable.


Yeah…

I saw a Reagan on it so I hit the link to one of the docs under his name. It had that he was mentioned in the doc as part of the data, but searching through the doc shows zero mention of him…

I was just talking about how the tool worked. It's very similar to Research Rabbit.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

flown-the-coop said:

Does not look reliable. Includes Hitler, Nixon and Saddam Hussein, but no mention of Jesus, the prophet Muhammad nor the Tooth Fairy.

Likely unreliable.


Yeah…

I saw a Reagan on it so I hit the link to one of the docs under his name. It had that he was mentioned in the doc as part of the data, but searching through the doc shows zero mention of him…

I was just talking about how the tool worked. It's very similar to Research Rabbit.
Look for Clinton & other Dems.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:



Really gets the noggin joggin

Edit: Why is the chief of staff contradicting the president?

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/16/trump-epstein-files-clinton-susie-wiles-interview




Small update on this
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean- its Susie Wiles.
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They were there, Bill and Hillary
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoop2 said:

They were there, Bill and Hillary

Yeah I know. Susie Wiles is a liar. She is the chief of staff for the Presidency which disavowed its base for wanting transparency
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

PaulsBunions said:



Really gets the noggin joggin

Edit: Why is the chief of staff contradicting the president?

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/16/trump-epstein-files-clinton-susie-wiles-interview




Small update on this


Nunya.

V/r,

Susie Wiles
You can turn off signatures, btw
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

PaulsBunions said:

PaulsBunions said:



Really gets the noggin joggin

Edit: Why is the chief of staff contradicting the president?

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/16/trump-epstein-files-clinton-susie-wiles-interview




Small update on this


Nunya.

V/r,

Susie Wiles

It's obvious the POTUS Chief of Staff has no business understanding what FBI files the POTUS may be mentioned when regarding a matter the press will be asking he and the cabinet about.

Whitehouse and Durbin are epic level ******ed.

Not too mention Executive Immunity is all that needs to be said.

Did they ever make requests of what Biden's chief of staff may have known or not known and why?
BlackGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

PaulsBunions said:



Really gets the noggin joggin

Edit: Why is the chief of staff contradicting the president?

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/16/trump-epstein-files-clinton-susie-wiles-interview




Small update on this


Just running a little interference.
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What an about face from John Kelly. Wiles is turning out to be just another lackey.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlackGold said:

PaulsBunions said:

PaulsBunions said:



Really gets the noggin joggin

Edit: Why is the chief of staff contradicting the president?

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/16/trump-epstein-files-clinton-susie-wiles-interview




Small update on this


Just running a little interference.


Wonder why.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Danimal said:

What an about face from John Kelly. Wiles is turning out to be just another lackey.

It is his Chief of Staff. They are to be the ultimate lackey.

John Kelly is a ****ing traitor and did a lousy service to his POTUS and thus to his Country.

Get real.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She is deep state and covering for the legacy of the Bush's and Reagan's pedo ways. Pretty obvious.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Speaking of Bush and Epstein… if Epstein was some sort of CIA friendly along with ties to Mossad, then it would be much more likely Bush '41 had knowledge of Epstein, his intelligence ties, and any nefarious activity.

Epstein made some minor contributions to the Bush campaigns though nothing particular note. But 41 would have damn sure knew of Robert Maxwell and was likely knowledgeable on Ghislaine and Jeffrey. Hell, he was head of the CIA and most certainly kept a close pulse as VP.

And the sweetheart Acosta plea deal was in 2008 under Bush '43.

If Epstein was "allowed" to conduct intelligence at the same time as he trafficked on underage girls, it needs to first be laid at the feet of Reagan, both Bushes and Clinton.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Bondi's desk must be enormous
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought you folks said she just had the list on the desk.

Now you want to poke fun at her by saying she meant every single file.

Pick a lane. A cheap shot at Bondi over the lack of organization and indexing by prior admins isn't supporting your narrative well.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

I thought you folks said she just had the list on the desk.

Now you want to poke fun at her by saying she meant every single file.

Pick a lane. A cheap shot at Bondi over the lack of organization and indexing by prior admins isn't supporting your narrative well.


"Stop being mean to the incompetent DC Bureaucrat"
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Danimal said:

What an about face from John Kelly. Wiles is turning out to be just another lackey.

It is his Chief of Staff. They are to be the ultimate lackey.

John Kelly is a ****ing traitor and did a lousy service to his POTUS and thus to his Country.

Get real.


Pledge fealty or it's treason
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Speaking of Bush and Epstein… if Epstein was some sort of CIA friendly along with ties to Mossad, then it would be much more likely Bush '41 had knowledge of Epstein, his intelligence ties, and any nefarious activity.

Epstein made some minor contributions to the Bush campaigns though nothing particular note. But 41 would have damn sure knew of Robert Maxwell and was likely knowledgeable on Ghislaine and Jeffrey. Hell, he was head of the CIA and most certainly kept a close pulse as VP.

And the sweetheart Acosta plea deal was in 2008 under Bush '43.

If Epstein was "allowed" to conduct intelligence at the same time as he trafficked on underage girls, it needs to first be laid at the feet of Reagan, both Bushes and Clinton.



Now you're getting it. All of those guys, and on down the line (Obama, Trump, Biden,etc) are the exact same people. Just placeholders put in front of the camera to shield the real decision makers.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MTG needs to explain why she's worth $22 million now when her total net worth was just over $700k including her ownership in the family construction business before she was in congress and that little construction company got hundreds of millions in infrastructure contracts and her stock portfolio went from not having one to $6 million dollars. She's just like the rest.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

MTG needs to explain why she's worth $22 million now when her total net worth was just over $700k including her ownership in the family construction business before she was in congress and that little construction company got hundreds of millions in infrastructure contracts and her stock portfolio went from not having one to $6 million dollars. She's just like the rest.

That would be nuts if it was from crazy deals and insider trading since she is one of the lone wolf's who has been going so hard after congress for slimey dealings.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


"We'll send a strongly worded letter to get results"
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1981 Monte Carlo said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

MTG needs to explain why she's worth $22 million now when her total net worth was just over $700k including her ownership in the family construction business before she was in congress and that little construction company got hundreds of millions in infrastructure contracts and her stock portfolio went from not having one to $6 million dollars. She's just like the rest.

That would be nuts if it was from crazy deals and insider trading since she is one of the lone wolf's who has been going so hard after congress for slimey dealings.



It's an old Democrat trick accuse others of what you're actually doing
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

1981 Monte Carlo said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

MTG needs to explain why she's worth $22 million now when her total net worth was just over $700k including her ownership in the family construction business before she was in congress and that little construction company got hundreds of millions in infrastructure contracts and her stock portfolio went from not having one to $6 million dollars. She's just like the rest.

That would be nuts if it was from crazy deals and insider trading since she is one of the lone wolf's who has been going so hard after congress for slimey dealings.



It's an old Democrat trick accuse others of what you're actually doing

Yeah, but it typically isn't effective when coming from the right because the dems own the media and so much more.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Have fun with this one Ross Bjork
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:



Have fun with this one Ross Bjork


Disgusting, as are all of Epstein's close orbiters.
First Page Refresh
Page 164 of 164
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.