**** NFA Lawsuit Filed - Silencer Shop, et al v. ATF, et al. *****

7,293 Views | 53 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by GeorgiAg
TRX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So this case isn't meant to toss the entirely unconstitutional NFA?

Move along, nothing will happen. The only solution is the constitution.
ULTRA MAGA
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ran a PACER report. Some Pro Hac filings and other preliminary stuff, but nothing substantive.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas joins the fight.

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2025/08/11/texas-14-other-states-join-lawsuit-eliminate-nfa-registration-rules/
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Motion for Summary Judgment filed. Good stuff!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278.49.0.pdf

Pam Bondi has filed a motion to stay proceedings. Judge granted extension of time for Defendant to respond to Oct. 29th. Good guys will file a response after that. Not sure if there will be any oral argument. After that, we get our ruling but then there will be appeals, perhaps up to the Supremes.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Bondi messes this one up she needs to go.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
javajaws said:

If Bondi messes this one up she needs to go.

She's on the wrong side! We want her to mess up. She's defending ATF.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Silencer Shop Foundation wishes to make and acquire silencers, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns for demonstration and educational purposes, among other reasons

Oh boy. That's awesome.

I, too, want suppressors for "educational purposes."

Also an SBR would be very educational for whomever decides to enter your house/bedroom at night..
Fightin_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

Quote:

Silencer Shop Foundation wishes to make and acquire silencers, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns for demonstration and educational purposes, among other reasons

Oh boy. That's awesome.

I, too, want suppressors for "educational purposes."


I just want them cause I don't like earplugs
The world needs mean tweets

My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA

Trump 2024
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Here, the Government notes 3,536,623 silencers,7 870,286 short-barreled rifles, 165,180 short-barreled shotguns, and 88,149 "any other weapons" registered nationwide as of May 2024

I wonder how many of those are owned by Aggies. And what the SEC breakdown would be.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
extension of time granted to ATF to respond to brief to mid-November.
The Sun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More than 10 and less than 100 for me.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ed Harley said:

Very weak Original Complaint for such a big issue.
GOA has been waiting for years to file this lawsuit. They were smart to limit their complaint strictly to the removal of the tax. If they challenge the NFA on the broader second amendment grounds and lose, we wind up in a worse place than if they hadn't filed at all.

Personally I want to see someone sue the state of Texas for taxing firearms and ammunition on the grounds that since the right to keep and bare arms was declared an individual right in Heller, taxation is now an infringement on individual rights.

But I suspect that is the next step with constitutional carry being the last step in restoring the Second Amendment.
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

javajaws said:

If Bondi messes this one up she needs to go.

She's on the wrong side! We want her to mess up. She's defending ATF.

Why can't we get the government to sandbag the case? You know that if it was dem administration with a leftist suit against a conservative law, that's exactly what would happen.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burrus86 said:



GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.H. Dexippus said:

GeorgiAg said:

javajaws said:

If Bondi messes this one up she needs to go.

She's on the wrong side! We want her to mess up. She's defending ATF.

Why can't we get the government to sandbag the case? You know that if it was dem administration with a leftist suit against a conservative law, that's exactly what would happen.


She has a duty to at least appear to be making an effort. So if she's good she will sandbag and we won't know about it. Plus the plaintiffs selected northern district of Texas for a reason. The real fight will be at the Supreme Court.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pizza said:

Burrus86 said:






I definitely like Trump more but am still not happy with the deficit. I also quit watching MSM. It's amazing the difference not hearing their spin. Get my news here or on X.

I also learned to just ignore all the crazy **** he says and just focus on the outcome. Can't wait for DeSantis or Vance where we won't have the crazy. I know ya probably enjoy it.
kyledr04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would be awesome to walk in the store and walk out with a suppressor.
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Auto Zone
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Updates:

Response and cross MSJ by Bondi/U.S.:
gov.uscourts.txnd.406278.60.0.pdf

Reply Brief filed by the Good Guys:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278.75.0.pdf

I just skimmed through them, but I like our chances. No idea when the Court will rule. Maybe a Christmas miracle?

Wives/GF: "You are so hard to buy for Christmas!"

[summary judgment to the good guys]

"I want suppressors for my next 5 birthdays and Christmases." Easy. Here's a list. Now you just walk in and buy them.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.