Another "conspiracy theory" proven to be 100% true.

Christopher Wray come on down……

That way Comey won't be the only former FBI Director indicted

It's lonely at the top

Wray won't be able to respond. He's got a plane to catch to go on vacation. **** your laws.

Why then, were they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

BadMoonRisin said:

---

Another "conspiracy theory" proven to be 100% true.

---

Like it or not, Trump hasn't been wrong very often.

HTownAg98 said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Why then, we're they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

---

Because these additional 274 agents were responding AFTER the events took place. The report says as much. You can go read it yourself. Page 45. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011.pdf

---

Help me here...

Since when does the FBI respond en masse to a call about pipe bombs and a red truck thought to have explosives without their badges displayed and their FBI windbreakers on?

If the argument is going to be "well because they were in a hurry", okay...but all 274 conveniently forgot to don gear identifying them as FBI while responding to an alleged bomb threat?

Further...where was ATF? ATF always shows up to bomb threats it seems...

And did they actually FIND any pipe bombs or an explosive red truck?

Quote:

---

FBI had 275 Undercover Agents in Crowd on Jan 6

---

Were they "undercover" or were they "instigators"?

doubledog said:

---

Quote:

---

FBI had 275 Undercover Agents in Crowd on Jan 6

---

Were they "undercover" or were they "instigators"?

---

Yes

I always thought it was a modern day Reichstag Fire and they have milked it for everything that they could.

HTownAg98 said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Why then, we're they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

---

Because these additional 274 agents were responding AFTER the events took place. The report says as much. You can go read it yourself. Page 45. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011.pdf

---

Then there should be evidence of a communique to these guys somewhere. I'd like to see it.

The FBI that openly colluded and conspired to rig/influence the 2020 election in favor of their preferred candidate (Joe Biden the braindead puppet), had almost 300 agent provocateurs in attendance on Jan 6? SHOCKED.

Our founders would have been stackin bodies by now.

HTownAg98 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Why then, we're they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

---

Because these additional 274 agents were responding AFTER the events took place. The report says as much. You can go read it yourself. Page 45. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011.pdf

---

Help me here...

Since when does the FBI respond en masse to a call about pipe bombs and a red truck thought to have explosives without their badges displayed and their FBI windbreakers on?

If the argument is going to be "well because they were in a hurry", okay...but all 274 conveniently forgot to don gear identifying them as FBI while responding to an alleged bomb threat?

Further...where was ATF? ATF always shows up to bomb threats it seems...

And did they actually FIND any pipe bombs or an explosive red truck?

---

Because Solomon is lying to you for clicks. They weren't all plain-clothed FBI. The source documents prove that up.

---

So where are the photos of all of the FBI present who weren't plain-clothed?

And where was ATF?

And the bombs?

HTownAg98 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Why then, we're they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

---

Because these additional 274 agents were responding AFTER the events took place. The report says as much. You can go read it yourself. Page 45. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011.pdf

---

Help me here...

Since when does the FBI respond en masse to a call about pipe bombs and a red truck thought to have explosives without their badges displayed and their FBI windbreakers on?

If the argument is going to be "well because they were in a hurry", okay...but all 274 conveniently forgot to don gear identifying them as FBI while responding to an alleged bomb threat?

Further...where was ATF? ATF always shows up to bomb threats it seems...

And did they actually FIND any pipe bombs or an explosive red truck?

---

Because Solomon is lying to you for clicks. They weren't all plain-clothed FBI. The source documents prove that up.

---

Do you listen to yourself and realize the absurdity of what you're attempting to defend?

Whoop2oo1 said:

---

Get Off My Lawn said:

---

Remember the purpose of stirring up violence on J6 was to block the planned debate regarding the legitimacy of electors sent following illegally conducted state elections.

---

This is 100% spot on. Funny how they decided to evacuate as Cruz stood up.

---

This right here. This detail is always glossed over or forgotten.

The categorization betrays the deception: plain clothes "embeds" SHOULD be distinct from uniformed response. The clear apparent purpose of aggregating those is to confuse the story. Honest people don't intentionally muddy the waters about what they did.

Chris Wray needs to be indicted next

HTownAg98 said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Why then, we're they sent in as plain clothes officers with concealed weapons, rather than with shields and riot gear.

Your statement looks like another red herring.

---

Because these additional 274 agents were responding AFTER the events took place. The report says as much. You can go read it yourself. Page 45. https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/25-011.pdf

---

The report says nothing about the 274 agents on page 45. What is says is quoted below and it is extremely carefully chosen language to avoid actually saying they didn't have any agents undercover. It steps all the way around the question by saying they "found no evidence in the materials they reviewed or the testimony they received". If they were careful about the materials they reviewed and who they got testimony from and what questions they asked those people, that can be a completely true statement while also allowing for there to be 274 undercover agents at the gathering.

Quote:

---

We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6. D'Antuono and the WFO CTD ASAC noted that FBI policy does not permit the FBI to have undercover employees in crowds at First Amendment-protected events absent some investigative authority, and the WFO CTD ASAC told the OIG that he denied a request from an FBI office to have an undercover employee engage in investigative activity on January 6.

---

And here is:

Seven minutes and 27 seconds of seditious conspiracy captured on video tape on American soil on Jan 6.

Undercover metro Police and Capital police officers dressed as Trump supporters chanting ‘U.S.A.’ and ‘Our House’ while encouraging protesters to climb… pic.twitter.com/ehQeCIEMv2

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) August 8, 2025

TyHolden said:

---

Who in congress knew and lied about this??? Probably half.

---

Well, the J6 committee destroyed all their evidence, illegally. You be the judge.