beerad12man said:
Like someone on the thread said, the dna was a 2.5 million to 1 chance.
I don't think they necessarily need the shell casing to confirm, but it helps paint the picture more. Especially considering he took his own like with it, and that he had a 380 on him on December 8 1991 when he was pulled over by border patrol in texas. Too bad they didn't have the means to connect things like that. Nowadays I think they would look into someone and have the communication fast enough that if someone got pulled over 48 hours later crossing a border with the same gun as a violent crime, they'd hold him.
Of course. They can find stuff like that right away now. Obviously DNA has been a game changer. But I think the Adam Walsh case was a harbinger or wakeup call for law enforcement to work together better. Maybe someone else has a better timeline or rationale to share.
I look at this company Palantir, and it's such a joke. It's basically these Silicon Valley grifters patting each other on the back because they wrote...a database? So much corruption...welcome to 1982.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough

