redcrayon said:
Hullabaloonatic said:
Phatbob said:
Hullabaloonatic said:
Phatbob said:
LOL, Trump is not attempting to use the Bible to say the opposite of what it says. He is very flawed and you won't get a lot of people to disagree with that. Talarico is straight up lying about what the Bible says in order to win office.
I'm losing my mind. Trump uses Christianity as a prop, just like everything else. He only believes in himself. Two Corinthians and gassing protesters at a church for a photo op was the clue and people missed it. I mean, the man has said he's never asked for forgiveness because he hasn't done anything wrong and ' I don't bring God into that picture '. And only after saying that (after consulting his advisers) did he try to assuage his base by saying 'well that's what communion is for.'
He conned Christians into believing he was one. He has shown his ass on how serious he treats his faith in both his behavior and knowledge of scripture throughout his adult lifetime but wielded it's power anytime it was convenient. The pastor of the NY Church that Trump occasionally attended said he hadn't seen Trump in 10 years. Like...you're unable to process how someone can read scripture and interpret it differently than you, so you accuse them of being the antichrist but someone who has actually gone against the most basic truisms of morality in the bible (adultery, idolatry, covetousness , etc) is just 'flawed.'
Maybe you don't mean me, because I am not a fan of Trump either, but it is really a different level of heresy between the two. Trump is patronizing. Talarico is false teaching. Again, the false teacher is more harshly treated in the Scriptures.
The central point that was made pages ago, is that what Talarico preaches isn't false, it's an interpretation based on love for thy neighbor and the stranger. You disagree with his interpretations and thus call him the antichrist. Meanwhile, Trump, who by any standard holds himself as an idol to be 'worshipped' and has crossed dozens of biblical boundaries, is 'acceptable.'
It is false. It's not simply an interpretation. He just decided that the teachings that he doesn't approve of are outdated. That's heresy. Sorry.
A buddy of mine sent me one of his sermons to listen to, and after it ended YouTube started the next one and I got about half of the next. Instead of letting scripture guide his beliefs and actions, he twists scripture to align with his own far left wing beliefs and actions. He purposefully misquoted two scriptures that are commonly misquoted (money is the root of all evil, not love of money, and easier for a camel to pass... than a rich man) while demonizing Wall Street and the rich and praising socialism.
He mentioned "christian nationalism" probalby 20-25 times and calls the Republicans, conservatives and everyone on the right evil christian nationalists. He called the J6ers christian nationalists. His "church" needs their 501c3 status revoked ASAP. His sermons could double as a monologue on MSNBC or CNN or a left wing campaign speech.
He also rails on who he calls the christian nationalists that are politicians and how evil it is they use their power, all the while running for political office so he can gain power. Hypocritical much.
All this was in 1.5 campaign speeches, errr I mean "sermons".