Agzonfire said:

---

https://www.wbko.com/2025/10/07/white-house-looking-into-decade-early-release-man-who-killed-6-year-old-boy/?outputType=amp

This man stabbed and killed a 6 yr old boy to death, along with several other members of the family. If he had suceeded he would have killed the entire family. Yet, 10 years later he is being released. He deserves a rusty needle of death along with an unmarked ditch of a grave.

This monster was let out because he's black and DAs don't want to be labeled as racist. This won't stop until people go after the ones not in the cage, but the ones unlocking the doors.

---

Where are you getting that he was released because he was black, or that the DA had anything to do with it, much less because the DA didn't want to be labeled as racist

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the kid by reason of insanity

---

which is completely bs he also threatened to kill the rest of the family,

Apollo79 said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the kid by reason of insanity

---

which is completely bs he also threatened to kill the rest of the family,

---

OK. And he served time for the assaults on the other 3

The question is what in Kentucky law compelled the release? Because the parole board was against it

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

---

If he's insane then why is he out? Shouldn't he be transferred to a minimum security prison for the mentally unstable? I'm confused.

---

The question is how was he convicted of the non-fatal stabbings yet acquitted of the murder by reason of insanity when it was all part of the same episode?

Unless it was all part of some messed up plea bargain

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

---

If he's insane then why is he out? Shouldn't he be transferred to a minimum security prison for the mentally unstable? I'm confused.

---

He's all better now……

RAB87 said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

---

Is it not important to you that he stabbed the entire family? The boy, his father, and two sisters. Yes, ONLY a 6-year old child died, right? This animal should NEVER be released from prison or a high-security insane asylum. So damn fatigued. And so glad we finally have a POTUS we calls out the injustice of liberalism.

---

what a weird line of posts by that poster

Hopefully the family does the needful, and I get selected for the jury.

VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

---

If he's insane then why is he out? Shouldn't he be transferred to a minimum security prison for the mentally unstable? I'm confused.

---

Because the democrats need him to show up at their next organized, "spontaneous", riot.
It will take someone like Kyle Rittenhouse 2.0, to get the 6 year old justice.

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

---

Which makes absolutely no sense how he was sane when stabbing them, but only became insane when stabbing the boy.

IslanderAg04 said:

---

If you stab someone to death, insanity should be an even stringer case to keep them off the streets.

---

That's often what happens - they do life sentences in state hospitals. Something is definitely fishy here, but I'm not convinced of the racism explanation yet.

Agzonfire said:

---

This monster was let out because he's black and DAs don't want to be labeled as racist. This won't stop until people go after the ones not in the cage, but the ones unlocking the doors.

---

This clause does not compute. The DA tried to have him convicted of a crime (murder) carrying a life sentence; he got acquitted (due to insanity). Legally he cannot be punished for this because in the eyes of the law, he is not guilty of murder. The crimes he was convicted of don't carry life sentences and he cannot be put in prison forever on these convictions.

I don't know how you get from this set of facts to the conclusion that the DA wanted him set free; if they wanted him free, they wouldn't have prosecuted him for murder.

I'm not sure what the laws on civil commitment are in KY, but this person would seem like an ideal candidate to be civilly committed for "treatment" of his violent insanity forever, or at least until he is old and infirm enough not to be able to hurt anyone.

AtomicActuator said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

---

Which makes absolutely no sense how he was sane when stabbing them, but only became insane when stabbing the boy.

---

Exactly. And I made that point above.

RAB87 said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

---

Is it not important to you that he stabbed the entire family? The boy, his father, and two sisters. Yes, ONLY a 6-year old child died, right? This animal should NEVER be released from prison or a high-security insane asylum. So damn fatigued. And so glad we finally have a POTUS we calls out the injustice of liberalism.

---

Needs to be gotten rid of. And so does that defense. Its BS. All the more reason to dispose of, not incarcerate.

RAB87 said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Martin Q. Blank said:

---

Exantus was convicted of stabbing Logan's dad and two of his sisters; however, he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for Logan's death.

Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison, the total of two consecutive 10-year sentences for each assault in the stabbing series.

How does a person get 20 years for murdering 3 people??? And nothing for murdering a 6 year old.

That is a death sentence in Texas.

---

Read closer

He didn't murder the other 3.

And he was acquitted of murdering the 6-year old by reason of insanity

---

Is it not important to you that he stabbed the entire family? The boy, his father, and two sisters. Yes, ONLY a 6-year old child died, right? This animal should NEVER be released from prison or a high-security insane asylum. So damn fatigued. And so glad we finally have a POTUS we calls out the injustice of liberalism.

---

Holy crap. What in the **** are you reading? I simply corrected the mistake made by a previous poster regarding who was killed and who was not I said none the words you put in my mouth

If I was the father of the little boy then that man would want to be back in prison.

Captain Pablo said:

---

Exactly. And I made that point above.

---

I haven't looked up the particulars, but I suspect that he was charged separately on purpose because of concerns that he might be acquitted due to insanity. You get the same matter in front of multiple juries. Perhaps they tried him for the murder first and then charged him with the assaults after the acquittal in the hopes of him being held criminally responsible for something, as opposed to nothing.

You could make the argument that multiple bites at the apple like that shouldn't be allowed, but it's not terribly uncommon for every known crime not to be charged. Alternatively, he could have been tried for all the crimes at once, risking an acquittal on all grounds.

Now, if the same jury somehow decided that the murdering was insane but the aggravated assaults committed during the same incident weren't, that's inexplicable. I doubt that's what happened, though.

YokelRidesAgain said:

---

Captain Pablo said:

---

Exactly. And I made that point above.

---

I haven't looked up the particulars, but I suspect that he was charged separately on purpose because of concerns that he might be acquitted due to insanity. You get the same matter in front of multiple juries. Perhaps they tried him for the murder first and then charged him with the assaults after the acquittal in the hopes of him being held criminally responsible for something, as opposed to nothing.

You could make the argument that multiple bites at the apple like that shouldn't be allowed, but it's not terribly uncommon for every known crime not to be charged. Alternatively, he could have been tried for all the crimes at once, risking an acquittal on all grounds.

Now, if the same jury somehow decided that the murdering was insane but the aggravated assaults committed during the same incident weren't, that's inexplicable. I doubt that's what happened, though.

---

Yes, I think it had to be some sort of weird charging decision, or weird plea bargain. I don't know if the thing went to a contested trial or not

Captain Pablo said:

---

OK. And he served time for the assaults on the other 3

The question is what in Kentucky law compelled the release? Because the parole board was against it

---

I don't know about Kentucky law, but worked for the Texas Board of Pardons and Parole for many years. A Mandatory Supervision date is calculated for each eligible inmate depending on the legislation in effect at the time they committed their offense. For offenses committed prior to 9/1/96, the law stated that the inmate had to be released when the time served plus their "good time" equaled 100% of their sentence. This did not involve any decision by the parole board. "Aggravated" offenses were not eligible for a Mandatory Supervision date and were required to serve all of their sentence or be granted parole.

In 1996, the law was changed to allow the parole board to deny an inmate's release to Mandatory Supervision.

Good job Florida!

BREAKING: The man who was released after serving half his sentence for k*lling a 6-year-old boy has been arrested in Florida for failing to register as a convicted felon

"The Marion County Sheriff’s Office and 5th Judicial Circuit State Attorney’s Office obtained a warrant for… pic.twitter.com/cHKBnhtN9C

— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) October 9, 2025

Colonel Kurtz said:

---

Good job Florida!

BREAKING: The man who was released after serving half his sentence for k*lling a 6-year-old boy has been arrested in Florida for failing to register as a convicted felon

"The Marion County Sheriff’s Office and 5th Judicial Circuit State Attorney’s Office obtained a warrant for… pic.twitter.com/cHKBnhtN9C

— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) October 9, 2025

---

Stick him in genpop for 10-15 minutes

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

I don't care if insane…in a just world, if you murder a child, you should never experience the free world ever again. No exceptions. Should be death or rotting in solitary for the rest of your life. You did the unthinkable, and now must pay the price.

---

Exactly. Letting this animal go free is basically saying his life is more valuable than that of the innocent little boy. He should be put down.

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

I don't care if insane…in a just world, if you murder a child, you should never experience the free world ever again. No exceptions. Should be death or rotting in solitary for the rest of your life. You did the unthinkable, and now must pay the price.

---

Yes. It is absolutely criminal that a man that was capable of brutally murdering a six year old would ever, under any circumstance, be released back in to society. I don't care about any of the details. A civilized people should never be meant to suffer a child murderer again, especially a case this egregious. The system completely failed.

zoneag said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Exactly. Letting this animal go free is basically saying his life is more valuable than that of the innocent little boy. He should be put down.

---

---

Blame the judge who sentenced him and their legislature. Again, I'm not sure about Kentucky law, but in Texas, the law once mandated that an inmate be released when their flat plus good time equaled 100% of the sentence.

Colonel Kurtz said:

---

Good job Florida!

BREAKING: The man who was released after serving half his sentence for k*lling a 6-year-old boy has been arrested in Florida for failing to register as a convicted felon

"The Marion County Sheriff’s Office and 5th Judicial Circuit State Attorney’s Office obtained a warrant for… pic.twitter.com/cHKBnhtN9C

— Unlimited L's (@unlimited_ls) October 9, 2025

---

He goes back to Kentucky, then what?! He needs to be executed.

Buck Turgidson said:

---

Why is insanity a defense at all? IDGAF if somebody claims they were crazy when they committed a murder. That person needs to be punished for what they did and removed from society permanently so they can never do it again. I'd say you execute murderers ESPECIALLY if they were deemed insane, just like you shoot a dog with rabies. They are a mortal threat.

---

I posted a similar response on another thread. Insanity should be a prosecutorial tool and if a murder is deemed insane, death sentence should be carried out within 30 days if not sooner. We do not need insane murderers on the street as a society

If I were that girl's dad, I'd probably be going to jail soon