Middle East immigrants

8,803 Views | 125 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by BharatAg
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

Who actually says "nation of immigrants"? Check out their backgrounds.

1. New immigrants themselves - Indians, Chinese, Arabs, Pakistanis, Syrians, Africans. Why? Because it benefits them and can be used against white Americans who have been here for 100s of years.
2. White liberals - They get to virtue signal about how unracist and un-xenophobic they are. They are the loud types who post on social media so everyone knows.

That is mostly it.

Immigrants from the 90s usually DO NOT say it because they don't want the US destroyed. White Americans who have been in the US for 100s of years do not say it but feel uncomfortable speaking up lest someone labels them a racist and a hater and cancels them.

Who denies we are a "nation of immigrants"? Granted, the immigrants who did the VAST majority of building this nation were European in origin (spare me the Chinese railroad builders and slaves), but we most certainly have our foundation on those Europeans willing to risk all to cross the ocean LEGALLY and assimilate into a great culture. Modern "immigrants", not so much.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It fine for groups to bring the best elements or highlights of their own cultures here to share, but it should be expected there is no lasting Balkanization or colonization in America. Become Americans. Adopt the American super culture and leverage its obvious advantages. Participate in it and add the highlights of your own past to it. Do not attempt to displace it or fundamentally alter it at a deep level, as it is effective and provides great benefits for all participants in it overall.

I am a big fan of the food and arts of many outside cultures, but many outside social, economic, and political practices from other cultures that are underperforming where they dominate are best abandoned or diminished in favor of the successful American approach.
TexasAggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Muslim immigrants are the LAST group any civilized and modern country should be taking. I am sorry, but if you are head over heels for a genocidal pedophile who forced a SIX yr old girl into marriage to be his sex slave, you are a horrible person. Even if you just loosely pledge allegiance to that perverted monster and don't act out his violent commands. We already have too many muslims and Trump needs to implement a complete and total ban on Muslims from ANY country.

I am fine taking Christians from these countries fleeing Islamic persecution, but that is it.


When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol


My foreign named specialist have been very good and personal. All US trained and raised in the USA. When my wife was a health director up in north Texas one of the pediatrician volunteers who gave of her time was a Muslim. Be careful with generalization.

Sorry, I don't have to admire or respect anyone who is in love with a genocidal pedophile like Muhammad. Or trust anyone whose religion says they can lie to and mistreat non-believers. Even Adolf Hitler didn't keep a SIX YEAR OLD GIRL as his sex slave.

I will be just fine in life without Muslims putting their pedo worshiping hands on me.


I pray that you are never in an accident and are unconscious and sent to the ER to save your life.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

We exist as a nation in large part because the Christian men of midevil Europe took up arms to expel the hoards from their lands and preserve an enclave for their women and children.

That's just not true, especially for the East, where the various crusades were all, ultimately, failures. There's more, but still not that much, truth to saying that about the Iberian peninsula.

That being said there's a ton of emotional ignorance on this thread that's just not worth engaging.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sarge 77 said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

What kinds of immigrants do we want?

AT this point, none.

Texas is full.


And that goes for Yankees and and people from the west.

Can I add the gringos from the Deep South as well?

I think we've got enough of those types of folks in East Texas.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Muslim immigrants are the LAST group any civilized and modern country should be taking. I am sorry, but if you are head over heels for a genocidal pedophile who forced a SIX yr old girl into marriage to be his sex slave, you are a horrible person. Even if you just loosely pledge allegiance to that perverted monster and don't act out his violent commands. We already have too many muslims and Trump needs to implement a complete and total ban on Muslims from ANY country.

I am fine taking Christians from these countries fleeing Islamic persecution, but that is it.


When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol


My foreign named specialist have been very good and personal. All US trained and raised in the USA. When my wife was a health director up in north Texas one of the pediatrician volunteers who gave of her time was a Muslim. Be careful with generalization.

Sorry, I don't have to admire or respect anyone who is in love with a genocidal pedophile like Muhammad. Or trust anyone whose religion says they can lie to and mistreat non-believers. Even Adolf Hitler didn't keep a SIX YEAR OLD GIRL as his sex slave.

I will be just fine in life without Muslims putting their pedo worshiping hands on me.


I pray that you are never in an accident and are unconscious and sent to the ER to save your life.

You just reminded me of an episode of The Jeffersons where George Jefferson saves the life of a white racist. When the racist is being taken to the hospital on a stretcher, he asks who he needs to thank for saving his life. The paramedic tells him it was George, and the racist says, "He should have let me die."

It's odd to think that people's racism is that strong, but it wouldn't surprise me if there were some people who woud rather die than have their, or their familiy member's, lives saved by anyone they see as an "other."
AgGrad99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
infinity ag said:

Who actually says "nation of immigrants"? Check out their backgrounds.

1. New immigrants themselves - Indians, Chinese, Arabs, Pakistanis, Syrians, Africans. Why? Because it benefits them and can be used against white Americans who have been here for 100s of years.
2. White liberals - They get to virtue signal about how unracist and un-xenophobic they are. They are the loud types who post on social media so everyone knows.

That is mostly it.

Immigrants from the 90s usually DO NOT say it because they don't want the US destroyed. White Americans who have been in the US for 100s of years do not say it but feel uncomfortable speaking up lest someone labels them a racist and a hater and cancels them.


And my issue, isn't even the phrase itself.

We are a nation of immigrants. I'm proud that the world sees us as a Melting Pot. It's actually quite extraordinary, that we've been so successful, melding so many diverse cultures into one.

But the phrase is ignorantly twisted to mean we should allow illegals to flood the country; rather than a process which is organized and beneficial for both the immigrant and our country.

I am friends with several people who have gone through the process and became citizens. They are from Mexico, Brasil, S.Africa, the Middle East. They are extremely proud to be Americans now (and despise illegal immigration). That's how it should be!
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IIIHorn said:

Renew online?
. I doubt these people are renewing, they are getting a DL for the first time per my buddy. It really bothered him what he saw

My buddy was required to go In to get a renewal, but that's really why I asked the question in this thread
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

Oh, piss off.

The removal of Christianity was not because of Classical Liberalism, you know, the Founding Father type.


It facilitated it 100%.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

Oh, piss off.

The removal of Christianity was not because of Classical Liberalism, you know, the Founding Father type.


It facilitated it 100%.

Then you should never use the Founding Fathers and Constitution as your measuring stick, because THAT is Classical Liberalism. Not that 60s *****
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

Oh, piss off.

The removal of Christianity was not because of Classical Liberalism, you know, the Founding Father type.


It facilitated it 100%.

Then you should never use the Founding Fathers and Constitution as your measuring stick, because THAT is Classical Liberalism. Not that 60s *****


the founders didn't have to resolve the issue of major conflicts of will as a result of displacement of the population by non-Christians. How did classical liberalism resolve it when it began? It removed Christianity from the public square.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Explain to me how it removed it. Specifically.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgGrad99 said:

infinity ag said:

Who actually says "nation of immigrants"? Check out their backgrounds.

1. New immigrants themselves - Indians, Chinese, Arabs, Pakistanis, Syrians, Africans. Why? Because it benefits them and can be used against white Americans who have been here for 100s of years.
2. White liberals - They get to virtue signal about how unracist and un-xenophobic they are. They are the loud types who post on social media so everyone knows.

That is mostly it.

Immigrants from the 90s usually DO NOT say it because they don't want the US destroyed. White Americans who have been in the US for 100s of years do not say it but feel uncomfortable speaking up lest someone labels them a racist and a hater and cancels them.


And my issue, isn't even the phrase itself.

We are a nation of immigrants. I'm proud that the world sees us as a Melting Pot. It's actually quite extraordinary, that we've been so successful, melding so many diverse cultures into one.

But the phrase is ignorantly twisted to mean we should allow illegals to flood the country; rather than a process which is organized and beneficial for both the immigrant and our country.

I am friends with several people who have gone through the process and became citizens. They are from Mexico, Brasil, S.Africa, the Middle East. They are extremely proud to be Americans now (and despise illegal immigration). That's how it should be!


Preach!
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

Explain to me how it removed it. Specifically.


As a political philosophy, it requires it. It's radically inclusive in principal, which requires the removal of religious precepts to resolve conflicts of will. That's what it is.

What does the liberal say about so called gay marriage? Or sodomy laws? Or no fault divorce? Or blasphemy laws? Public funding of catechesis for our children? All of them are decided in favor of anti-Christianity and in some cases, even in an attempt to contravene ontological reality, which is impossible.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keep this in mind.

Muslims are nice people (mostly) when they are by themselves or in small groups. When they congregate into mobs, the little Muhammad within them comes to the fore and they transform into blood-thirsty barbarians.

So be careful before you say "My friend Akhmed is such a nice guy... he gave me biryani for Ramadan". Yes, but that is because doesn't have 100 military age Muslim men surrounding him. When he does, you will be mincemeat.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I disagree, and as expected, you used the modern liberal examples as your basis.

You don't understand the concept from my point of view.
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

I disagree, and as expected, you used the modern liberal examples as your basis.

You don't understand the concept from my point of view.


I understand that you don't understand what liberalism is.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

I disagree, and as expected, you used the modern liberal examples as your basis.

You don't understand the concept from my point of view.


I understand that you don't understand what liberalism is.

Incorrect

You don't understand the difference between what the Founders were and what those *******s from the 60s onwards were/are?

Classical
Modern

Different ideologies. Barely overlapping. The modern a *******ization of the former.
Mr. Thunderclap McGirthy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get Off My Lawn said:

ts5641 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

What kinds of immigrants do we want? Muslim? Hindu? Christian?

Two out of the three groups have a legal path, and I'll let you guess which ones.

Christian. Conservative voting educated Christians. That's who we want. Diversity sucks balls. Unity is our strength.

And not the squishy "classically liberal" type Christians who ceded culture by withdrawing God from public spaces. We want the Gen Z male Christianity that looks fondly upon the crusades.

Where do you think my 2 got that? Gen X male here.
In Hoc Signo Vinces
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgGrad99 said:

infinity ag said:

Who actually says "nation of immigrants"? Check out their backgrounds.

1. New immigrants themselves - Indians, Chinese, Arabs, Pakistanis, Syrians, Africans. Why? Because it benefits them and can be used against white Americans who have been here for 100s of years.
2. White liberals - They get to virtue signal about how unracist and un-xenophobic they are. They are the loud types who post on social media so everyone knows.

That is mostly it.

Immigrants from the 90s usually DO NOT say it because they don't want the US destroyed. White Americans who have been in the US for 100s of years do not say it but feel uncomfortable speaking up lest someone labels them a racist and a hater and cancels them.


And my issue, isn't even the phrase itself.

We are a nation of immigrants. I'm proud that the world sees us as a Melting Pot. It's actually quite extraordinary, that we've been so successful, melding so many diverse cultures into one.

But the phrase is ignorantly twisted to mean we should allow illegals to flood the country; rather than a process which is organized and beneficial for both the immigrant and our country.

I am friends with several people who have gone through the process and became citizens. They are from Mexico, Brasil, S.Africa, the Middle East. They are extremely proud to be Americans now (and despise illegal immigration). That's how it should be!


Yes, exactly that was my point.

"Nation of immigrants" is history. We are in 2025. Times have changed. We do not need more immigrants. We can decide if we ever need any more. Just because people came in easy in 1700AD doesn't mean the same rules apply now.

There also can come a time when we do not want any immigrants (good or bad). That should be okay too.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Muslim immigrants are the LAST group any civilized and modern country should be taking. I am sorry, but if you are head over heels for a genocidal pedophile who forced a SIX yr old girl into marriage to be his sex slave, you are a horrible person. Even if you just loosely pledge allegiance to that perverted monster and don't act out his violent commands. We already have too many muslims and Trump needs to implement a complete and total ban on Muslims from ANY country.

I am fine taking Christians from these countries fleeing Islamic persecution, but that is it.


When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol


My foreign named specialist have been very good and personal. All US trained and raised in the USA. When my wife was a health director up in north Texas one of the pediatrician volunteers who gave of her time was a Muslim. Be careful with generalization.

Sorry, I don't have to admire or respect anyone who is in love with a genocidal pedophile like Muhammad. Or trust anyone whose religion says they can lie to and mistreat non-believers. Even Adolf Hitler didn't keep a SIX YEAR OLD GIRL as his sex slave.

I will be just fine in life without Muslims putting their pedo worshiping hands on me.


I pray that you are never in an accident and are unconscious and sent to the ER to save your life.

So your argument is that we need to let in tons of pedo worshiping anti-western Muslims because otherwise we would not have medical care in Thw West? We NEED them to survive?
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sarge 77 said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

What kinds of immigrants do we want?

AT this point, none.

Texas is full.


And that goes for Yankees and and people from the west.

Luckily I made it back from California just under the wire.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HollywoodBQ said:

Sarge 77 said:

CDUB98 said:

Quote:

What kinds of immigrants do we want?

AT this point, none.

Texas is full.


And that goes for Yankees and and people from the west.

Luckily I made it back from California just under the wire.

Yeah, but you still smell like California.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
infinity ag said:

Keep this in mind.

Muslims are nice people (mostly) when they are by themselves or in small groups. When they congregate into mobs, the little Muhammad within them comes to the fore and they transform into blood-thirsty barbarians.

So be careful before you say "My friend Akhmed is such a nice guy... he gave me biryani for Ramadan". Yes, but that is because doesn't have 100 military age Muslim men surrounding him. When he does, you will be mincemeat.

THIS TIMES A MILLION
Bob Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CDUB98 said:

Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

I disagree, and as expected, you used the modern liberal examples as your basis.

You don't understand the concept from my point of view.


I understand that you don't understand what liberalism is.

Incorrect

You don't understand the difference between what the Founders were and what those *******s from the 60s onwards were/are?

Classical
Modern

Different ideologies. Barely overlapping. The modern a *******ization of the former.


The founders weren't strictly liberal. They were political philosophers who agreed to a large degree with Montesquieu, whose ideas were heavily influenced by his Christianity, and Aquinas among others, and they weren't a monolith. Their sole influence weren't Hobbes and Locke believe it or not. That's a lie. They definitely understood the pragmatic nature of liberalism as a political philosophy, and its limitations. they actually understood the need for religion in the public square. They understood community, and that people cannot commune around their differences.

Pointing to the founders as models of liberalism is such a lie. Actual liberalism cannot resolve conflicts of will except to side with the more debased will. If there's a difference between what you're thinking about as the 2 concepts of liberalism, it's just that one is downstream of the other.
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie73 said:

When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

Other than Optometry and my GP when I lived in Australia, I can't recall visiting any white American doctor outside of the Emergency Room in the past 25 years.

So it's not really a new change.
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol

My Covid era doctor was a Filipina.
For a lot of stuff, she was great but... once Covid hit, she lost her mind.

The funniest thing was when she kept trying to get me to take the vax after I'd already had Covid 3 times by late 2021.

The argument that the Covid vax would provide me better immunity than actually recovering from Covid wasn't a winner in my book.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In the current usage, you are misusing "liberalism". The FF were "classical liberals" which is, pretty much, now called "libertarianism".

You're incorrect on a bunch of other stuff as well, but it's just not worth engaging someone who is entrenched in their beliefs.
DarkBrandon01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

What kinds of immigrants do we want? Muslim? Hindu? Christian?

Two out of the three groups have a legal path, and I'll let you guess which ones.

Christian. Conservative voting educated Christians. That's who we want. Diversity sucks balls. Unity is our strength.


I guess we should start sending green cards to sub Saharan Africa because that's where all the conservative Christians are at.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

Bob Lee said:

CDUB98 said:

I disagree, and as expected, you used the modern liberal examples as your basis.

You don't understand the concept from my point of view.


I understand that you don't understand what liberalism is.

Incorrect

You don't understand the difference between what the Founders were and what those *******s from the 60s onwards were/are?

Classical
Modern

Different ideologies. Barely overlapping. The modern a *******ization of the former.


The founders weren't strictly liberal. They were political philosophers who agreed to a large degree with Montesquieu, whose ideas were heavily influenced by his Christianity, and Aquinas among others, and they weren't a monolith. Their sole influence weren't Hobbes and Locke believe it or not. That's a lie. They definitely understood the pragmatic nature of liberalism as a political philosophy, and its limitations. they actually understood the need for religion in the public square. They understood community, and that people cannot commune around their differences.

Pointing to the founders as models of liberalism is such a lie. Actual liberalism cannot resolve conflicts of will except to side with the more debased will. If there's a difference between what you're thinking about as the 2 concepts of liberalism, it's just that one is downstream of the other.

I agreed with everything up until the bolded.

Why does it have to side with the debased will? I'd argue that the debased will is the one more likely to infringe upon someone else's natural rights.

So, we're not going to agree, obviously, but seems we've reached a point where we could now talk. Sadly, TA is not a great venue for it.

If, fundamentally, you don't believe the Founders had the best vision/version of gov't the world has come up with, then your only alternatives are eventually some form of authoritarian oppression. Either secular or theocratic. If you, personally, want an authoritarian theocracy, then we likely have no common ground.

Bottom line for me is: I do not want to be ruled. I will oppose any authoritarian gov't. I will support a gov't that wants to leave me the hell alone. In a very simplistic way, that is the compromise of the Founders.

Once the gov't became involved in social engineering at the Federal level, it was game over. I originally typed in a starting point, but didn't want to open that can of worms.

What we have today is a 100% illiberal gov't, and only getting worse. The solution should not be more illiberalism.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I'd already had Covid 3 times by late 2021.

Damn, son. You got first crack at all the nasty variants.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DarkBrandon01 said:

ts5641 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

What kinds of immigrants do we want? Muslim? Hindu? Christian?

Two out of the three groups have a legal path, and I'll let you guess which ones.

Christian. Conservative voting educated Christians. That's who we want. Diversity sucks balls. Unity is our strength.


I guess we should start sending green cards to sub Saharan Africa because that's where all the conservative Christians are at.

Sub-Saharan Africans are some of the nicest, hardest working folks I've ever been around. I'd take all of them in the US.....just not Texas, because, as I said, it's full.

I know you meant this as an implication that conservative Christians are just white racists, but, as always, truth eludes when feelings reign.


Oh, and BTW, those Christians from Africa cannot stand the lazy, stupid, ghetto culture of urban blacks. You'd know that if you'd actually ever been around them.
TexasAggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Muslim immigrants are the LAST group any civilized and modern country should be taking. I am sorry, but if you are head over heels for a genocidal pedophile who forced a SIX yr old girl into marriage to be his sex slave, you are a horrible person. Even if you just loosely pledge allegiance to that perverted monster and don't act out his violent commands. We already have too many muslims and Trump needs to implement a complete and total ban on Muslims from ANY country.

I am fine taking Christians from these countries fleeing Islamic persecution, but that is it.


When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol


My foreign named specialist have been very good and personal. All US trained and raised in the USA. When my wife was a health director up in north Texas one of the pediatrician volunteers who gave of her time was a Muslim. Be careful with generalization.

Sorry, I don't have to admire or respect anyone who is in love with a genocidal pedophile like Muhammad. Or trust anyone whose religion says they can lie to and mistreat non-believers. Even Adolf Hitler didn't keep a SIX YEAR OLD GIRL as his sex slave.

I will be just fine in life without Muslims putting their pedo worshiping hands on me.


I pray that you are never in an accident and are unconscious and sent to the ER to save your life.

So your argument is that we need to let in tons of pedo worshiping anti-western Muslims because otherwise we would not have medical care in Thw West? We NEED them to survive?


You are over blowing everything, but you do you.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CDUB98 said:

DarkBrandon01 said:

ts5641 said:

Ozzy Osbourne said:

What kinds of immigrants do we want? Muslim? Hindu? Christian?

Two out of the three groups have a legal path, and I'll let you guess which ones.

Christian. Conservative voting educated Christians. That's who we want. Diversity sucks balls. Unity is our strength.


I guess we should start sending green cards to sub Saharan Africa because that's where all the conservative Christians are at.

Sub-Saharan Africans are some of the nicest, hardest working folks I've ever been around. I'd take all of them in the US.....just not Texas, because, as I said, it's full.

I know you meant this as an implication that conservative Christians are just white racists, but, as always, truth eludes when feelings reign.


Oh, and BTW, those Christians from Africa cannot stand the lazy, stupid, ghetto culture of urban blacks. You'd know that if you'd actually ever been around them.

Tons of Christian Nigerians out here in Cypress...they are all great people from my experience, and I would argue, more polished AND morally upright than most white Americans. And obviously all white leftists lol.

And I can concur...they want NOTHING to do with American "black culture"...they are embarrassd by it. They have almost nothing in common with urban black democrats, aside from skin color.
ME92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TexasAggie73 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Muslim immigrants are the LAST group any civilized and modern country should be taking. I am sorry, but if you are head over heels for a genocidal pedophile who forced a SIX yr old girl into marriage to be his sex slave, you are a horrible person. Even if you just loosely pledge allegiance to that perverted monster and don't act out his violent commands. We already have too many muslims and Trump needs to implement a complete and total ban on Muslims from ANY country.

I am fine taking Christians from these countries fleeing Islamic persecution, but that is it.


When was the last time you went to a medical doctor, especially a specialist that had a Anglo name? Most that I see today have last names of Khan, Agarwal,Masud and other similar names. The only Anglo one I see is my GP.

I have a fully Americanized Vietnamese-American female doctor as my primary physician, but you aren't wrong...lots of unfriendly third world robots in medicine nowadays. When our daughter was born in 2021 we were given a list of potential pediatricians and I immediately weeded out all foreign sounding names. Settled on the guy with a normal anglo name and could not have been happier. Even my asian wife agreed that any foreigner, especially female, would be a full on Covid-Karen who was incapable of relating to their patients or listening to them, or, heaven forbid, actually thinking outside of the box on things...and outside of the manual. She knew a white guy would almost assuredly be the most practical.

One of the best decisions we ever made. Can you imagine a muslim or asian/Indian female pediatrician for your child during the pandemic? F that lol


My foreign named specialist have been very good and personal. All US trained and raised in the USA. When my wife was a health director up in north Texas one of the pediatrician volunteers who gave of her time was a Muslim. Be careful with generalization.


Islam calls for its believers to treat people of other religions badly. Whether by taxing them, forcing them to not do things that Islam prohibits, or by straight up calling for their killing.

It's very difficult to know if an individual is a 'good' muslim who follows islamic rules or a 'bad' muslim who can be trusted to not discriminate against people of other religions.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.