If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Sharped tongued woman!

Squadron7 said:

---

MelvinUdall said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

This wasn't about not letting the world know, as you said, he tweeted about it…that is not the issue…why do folks like yourself, always make women victims?

---

Because to Lefties, women and minorities aren't people with their own agency and therefore must be treated and watched over as beloved pets.

---

Good to know what we have been taught all these years that in fact, women are not equal to men…got it!

pdc093 said:

---

The ENEMY of the people and should be treated as such...
Embarrassing & HOSTILE....

NBC’s Kristen Welker shouts hostile questions during President Trump's meeting with Xi Jinping, disrupting the meeting needs her WH press pool credentials immediately revoked!

Totally unacceptable behavior! Enemy of America! pic.twitter.com/JX36QirRau

— Mike Engleman🇺🇲 (@RealHickory) October 30, 2025

---

She asked a question, Trump didn't respond and then a bunch of other reporters asked questions.

What's the big deal?

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Yes, because women, libs, the media, etc. never insult him.

MelvinUdall said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

This wasn't about not letting the world know, as you said, he tweeted about it…that is not the issue…why do folks like yourself, always make women victims?

---

Not ALWAYS...

Sometimes there's a dude playing in their sport league and HE is the victim and the women are just being unreasonable...

aggieforester05 said:

---

So many otherwise intelligent and successful left leaning people that I know and follow on social media are completely clueless about reality, because they have no idea that the media is left wing biased. The legitimately believe that the mainstream outlets are unbiased and that for example Fox News is a biased outlier. Similarly they are incapable of recognizing the left wing bias in academia and the bureaucracy. If you point it out to them, they treat you like a conspiracy theorist and then confirm their own biases with more sources they don't realize are biased. It's a major freaking problem.

---

If they need evidence, they only need to watch Welker's Sunday show. When a Democratic rep is on, its softball questions with a lot of head nodding and very few follow ups. If it is a Conservative, her demeanor and questions are far more critical and attempt to corner the guest.

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Maybe Kristen Welker should know her place and shut the **** up until someone is talking to her.

People are getting their panties in a wad over this? It is a major change in decades of policy and a valid question. Reporters always try to get questions in during these photo ops. Sometimes the president will answer, or sometimes like here the president will decline.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Maybe Kristen Welker should know her place and shut the **** up until someone is talking to her.

---

Career dem sycophant motorboating D bosoms who took maternity leave to be with the babies she paid some other lady to have for her. Her husband looks like Phillip Seymour Hoffman's ******ed cousin.

Other than that, shes great.

torrid said:

---

People are getting their panties in a wad over this? It is a major change in decades of policy and a valid question. Reporters always try to get questions in during these photo ops. Sometimes the president will answer, or sometimes like here the president will decline.

---

It was not the time and she knew exactly what she was doing. Her question was an attempt to embarrass or otherwise make the meeting with Xi uncomfortable, tense.

She will not be part of the WH press pool going forward, book it. She can hang in the penalty box with the AP.

mm98 said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

So many otherwise intelligent and successful left leaning people that I know and follow on social media are completely clueless about reality, because they have no idea that the media is left wing biased. The legitimately believe that the mainstream outlets are unbiased and that for example Fox News is a biased outlier. Similarly they are incapable of recognizing the left wing bias in academia and the bureaucracy. If you point it out to them, they treat you like a conspiracy theorist and then confirm their own biases with more sources they don't realize are biased. It's a major freaking problem.

---

If they need evidence, they only need to watch Welker's Sunday show. When a Democratic rep is on, its softball questions with a lot of head nodding and very few follow ups. If it is a Conservative, her demeanor and questions are far more critical and attempt to corner the guest.

---

It's why I'll never understand why any true conservative would ever go on that show. Nobody watches it, especially anyone who would vote for you. It's like going to play tech in Lubbock. There is just not enough benefit for the risks.

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Insult a woman or insult a leftist mouthpiece that pretends to be objective while overzealously attacking Republicans and goaltending for Democrats?

Do you think conservative biased journalists that pretend to be objective are a problem?

If your answer is yes, then why are left biased journalists that pretend to be objective and outnumber the former by 10:1 not a problem?

Conservatives know they're watching right wing biased sources and they've turned to them out of frustration with the MSM being overtly left wing. Leftists do not realize they're watching/reading biased sources, because the prevalence of their sources is so overwhelming that they believe they are center or normal. Anything that doesn't confirm their biases is "far right". That is a problem, half the country is completely brainwashed.

Don't get me wrong, the problem isn't with sources like Heavy, HuffPo, DailyKos, etc. Those sources are admittedly left wing. They may lie most of the time, but at least they're honest about their political alignment. The problem is mainstream sources that pretend to be unbiased.

Fox News is part of the problem, but I doubt you'll find many conservatives that deny their bias. Most lefties describe it as far more biased than CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, NY Times, WAPO, Etc. That's simply untrue. Fox News was a response to a hole in the market created by the above outlets' strong left wing bias.

Remember the media shredding Bush, Jr. for eight years and then fawning over Obama like he was the second coming of Jesus?

Their rabid turn against Trump the second he won the primary?

Their continued disinterest in the rampant corruption of the Biden admin?

How does their disparate and undeserved treatment of the two parties not ring an bell in the thick skulls of leftists? Do they realize it and just don't care because it benefits them politically or are they too dense to see what's right in front of them?

If your supposed unbiased source says "Democrat good" and "Republican bad" 90% of the time, it's a left wing pile of ***** Because let me tell you Democrats aren't any better than Republicans, there's zero justification for not holding them accountable equally with Republicans.

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

Trump works very well with women. But rude disrespectful twits like this one? Don't feel sorry for her. Quit making women victims. She's a big girl. She knew what she was doing. She was trying to be destructive and unprofessional.

Remember the media shredding Bush, Jr. for eight years and then fawning over Obama like he was the second coming of Jesus?

And pretend that Biden didn't have dementia problems? The man hardly ever spoke to them, and when he did, he wasn't coherent. And they would just be as nice as they could not talk over him or democrat people. Even when they didn't answer a question and everybody knew he was zonked.

But when you have people that hate Trump, they're not rational about anything.

She asked a question, Trump didn't respond and then a bunch of other reporters asked questions.

What's the big deal?

Nothing. Orange man bad.

Got to make women victims.

It's the Democrat way.

Watermelon Man said:

---

If Trump didn't want the world to know he wants to start nuke testing again, he could have just not tweeted it out.

I think Trump just saw it was a good opportunity to insult a woman, so he took it.

---

What is wrong with you? Seriously, WTF???

She's grand standing at an inappropriate moment. She could ask that question on AF One. Horrible American.

She's terrible and overtly biased. Its everywhere down to the local media. An example of the bias:

I used to live in Memphis so get a lot of memphis stuff popping up on my Facebook feed. I saw a Facebook post from one the local NBC affiliate in Memphis that talked about the JD Vance visit to Ole Miss last night as part of the Turning Point visit there. There was a giant crowd for that one, and across campus a "counter" meeting of "Young Democrats" held at the same time. So the local NBC news Facebook account the news posts a picture of the "Young Dems" meeting and talks about it and only pays lip service to the event the VP was at that drew thousands. they got ratio'd in the comments for the obvious bias (and the picture they posted showed nothing but older people, not "Young Dems", LOL).

torrid said:

---

People are getting their panties in a wad over this? It is a major change in decades of policy and a valid question. Reporters always try to get questions in during these photo ops. Sometimes the president will answer, or sometimes like here the president will decline.

---

"Panties in a wad"?

Suggesting that women are easily excitable? Perhaps irrational?

Misogynist much?

I wish that Americans, like Welker, were American first. You're in a foreign country, with you POTUS sitting across from the leader of our biggest adversary, and you want to make him look bad? Save that for when you get back home.

It was the inappropriateness of the setting for that question that has "panties in a wad".

At least act like your on the side of the country where you get that huge paycheck.

Morbo the Annihilator said:

---

torrid said:

---

People are getting their panties in a wad over this? It is a major change in decades of policy and a valid question. Reporters always try to get questions in during these photo ops. Sometimes the president will answer, or sometimes like here the president will decline.

---

"Panties in a wad"?

Suggesting that women are easily excitable? Perhaps irrational?

Misogynist much?

---

No, I think implies men wearing women's underwear. Maybe homophobic or transphobic would be a more accurate description?

Quote:

---

No, I think implies men wearing women's underwear. Maybe homophobic or transphobic would be a more accurate description?

---

I think the term "getting a wad in their panties" would be transphobic.

And by transphobic, I mean accurate.

cecil77 said:

---

I wish that Americans, like Welker, were American first. You're in a foreign country, with you POTUS sitting across from the leader of our biggest adversary, and you want to make him look bad? Save that for when you get back home.

It was the inappropriateness of the setting for that question that has "panties in a wad".

At least act like your on the side of the country where you get that huge paycheck.

---

Agreed. This was precisely why people took issue with it.

It's a valid question, when you're back home or he's holding court on AF1.

But that was an extremely inappropriate time to ask that question, and she knew it. It's only purpose was to create tension, in a setting where we're trying to de-escalate things with a rival.

She's showing her Chinese handlers that she is doing as paid

pdc093 said:

---

The ENEMY of the people and should be treated as such...
Embarrassing & HOSTILE....

NBC’s Kristen Welker shouts hostile questions during President Trump's meeting with Xi Jinping, disrupting the meeting needs her WH press pool credentials immediately revoked!

Totally unacceptable behavior! Enemy of America! pic.twitter.com/JX36QirRau

— Mike Engleman🇺🇲 (@RealHickory) October 30, 2025

---

She asked a question? Are you not even allowed to do that around here anymore?

Normally, I am very disdainful and harshly criticize the CCP for their tyrannical tactics of disappearing people and torture, and especially organ harvesting. However, when it comes to the CCP and Western media, I am willing to look the other way. I could see the most stoic alpha male on the planet getting an organ from Kristen Welker. 10 days post surgery, and 100% he will be an insufferable, stark-raving *****!!!