Those two can have a jag off.

Orbital Debris said:

---

You always know when you are in the room with one because they are like vegans.

---

It's like the old joke:

Q: When you meet a guy, how can you tell he went to Notre Dame?

A: Don't worry, he'll tell you in the first 10 seconds.

I know of two that I served with in Afghanistan. A COL and a LTC.

Ok, I am glad Pete said that. I noticed the errors also but thought it was some weird Navy officer stuff.

NM.

Based on US Navy regulations (order of precedence from top down, inboard to outboard), the medals in the photo appear reversed in row order. Higher precedence awards like the Distinguished Flying Cross and Legion of Merit are on lower rows, while lower ones (e.g., service medals)…

— Grok (@grok) November 25, 2025

I didn't want to spend the time to figure out the bottom row as they are pretty obscured.

yeah, it was the SW Asia and Desert Storm medals that tipped it for me. I also have those and they are bottom row for a reason.

Once again, I thought Dems believed in the principle that "No one is above the law." Huh.

G Martin 87 said:

---

Once again, I thought Dems believed in the principle that "No one is above the law." Huh.

---

No one is above the law. And if Mark Kelly broke a law he needs to face whatever punishment comes his way.

Yes, it is as easy to say as that. And that's cause I don't consider myself a dem anymore.

Love it! As Charlie Kirk said many times, the left is the only side that plays offense. We need to play more offense.

rocky the dog said:

---

---

Do you know how bad you hate America to be a member of congress and do that video? The left are ****ing unhinged!

Psycho Bunny said:

---

Just saw her interview on ABC. Shes a total clown. First Slotkin makes a video telling service members you dont have to follow the president's orders. Then on Sunday on ABC she says, I have no clue what illegal orders the president has given.

WTF lady. You are either deranged with TDS or just stupid.

---

She's a democrat so she's both.

This is from few days ago but I just saw this. so SIAP. Anyone else get Joe and dead Beau Biden vibes here? (Thank heavens, his wife didn't actually die but the guy that shot her was a crazy guy, not politically motivated last I read.)

A gunman tried to silence my wife in an extreme act of political violence.

Now, Trump has called for my execution because he didn’t like what I had to say.

Gabby and I know, when others try to silence you, you must keep speaking out — and that’s exactly what we’re going to do. pic.twitter.com/CqUXxaKrLk

— Captain Mark Kelly (@CaptMarkKelly) November 21, 2025

The seditious 6 would be proud as they see their efforts produce these kinds of results within the ranks.

Army JAG officer MAJ Baker has been very vocal about her dissension on social media for months, and now she’s publicly stating she will not comply with lawful orders she… pic.twitter.com/OcAmsYNBs2

— Shoe (@samosaur) November 25, 2025

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

No one is above the law. And if Mark Kelly broke a law he needs to face whatever punishment comes his way.

---

UCMJ is not restricted to criminal acts only. Conduct unbecoming, for example.

---

And, like always, I got learned something new by ya, Mama Hawg.

As for Mark, if he did something he wasn't supposed to do and is going to be held accountable, then so be it. That's life in the real world.

For anyone to be mad that he's being called out on it and going to be held accountable for it better not have been thrilled when Trump had all that happened to him with all that did happen to him.

There are enough (all of them if we're being honest) hypocrites in DC. It's long overdue for their supporters to stop acting like sycophants and start acting like adults and hold their own to account.

Again, thanks for the edumication.

BusterAg said:

---

will25u said:

---

The despicable video urging @DeptofWar troops to “refuse illegal orders” may seem harmless to civilians — but it carries a different weight inside the military.

This was a politically-motivated influence operation:

☑️ It never named a specific “illegal order.”
☑️ It created…

— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) November 25, 2025

---

Regardless if anything happens to Kelly, dragging him in for a court martial on this issue is a good move.

It nips the purpose of the video in the bud immediately.

It sends a message that the administration will not stand for insubordination, and you had better be 100% sure you know what you are doing if you fail to follow an order, or you are going to be court martialed. This administration is not playing around.

So, even if nothing happens to Kelly, this reaction is a good move, in my opinion.

---

Couldn't agree more.

I work for the state, and if I do anything that makes the state look bad (I know, it's ironic that doesn't pertain to politicians, but I digress), regardless of why I did it, I will be held to account.

Rules are rules, like them or not.

Quote:

---

And, like always, I got learned something new by ya, Mama Hawg.

As for Mark, if he did something he wasn't supposed to do and is going to be held accountable, then so be it. That's life in the real world.

For anyone to be mad that he's being called out on it and going to be held accountable for it better not have been thrilled when Trump had all that happened to him with all that did happen to him.

There are enough (all of them if we're being honest) hypocrites in DC. It's long overdue for their supporters to stop acting like sycophants and start acting like adults and hold their own to account.

Again, thanks for the edumication.

---

You are welcome. The UCMJ is a completely different animal than statutory criminal law. It is more a Code of Conduct for military members (and their families as active duty are held responsible for the conduct of their dependents) that is 24/7/365 not just work related.

Even first amendment rights are curtailed in that you can say what you want but not when active and in uniform.

This is going to end like comey/james, the juice is not worth the squeeze, total uphill battle and thin on argument.

Burpelson said:

---

This is going to end like comey/james, the juice is not worth the squeeze, total uphill battle and thin on argument.

---

There is nothing thin about it. They picked this fight by committing sedition. Will anything bad happen to them? Probably not since we have two systems of justice and the left is entirely devoid of ethics.

The major should also be court martialed and sent to Leavenworth.

USA*** said:

---

will25u said:

---

The seditious 6 would be proud as they see their efforts produce these kinds of results within the ranks.

Army JAG officer MAJ Baker has been very vocal about her dissension on social media for months, and now she’s publicly stating she will not comply with lawful orders she… pic.twitter.com/OcAmsYNBs2

— Shoe (@samosaur) November 25, 2025

---

Hmmm...sounds like Article 32 /89 or 90 time for this foul mouthed Maj.

---

indeed, this will be an interesting case to follow. Will be quite telling if the video is referenced in defense of her actions.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

And, like always, I got learned something new by ya, Mama Hawg.

As for Mark, if he did something he wasn't supposed to do and is going to be held accountable, then so be it. That's life in the real world.

For anyone to be mad that he's being called out on it and going to be held accountable for it better not have been thrilled when Trump had all that happened to him with all that did happen to him.

There are enough (all of them if we're being honest) hypocrites in DC. It's long overdue for their supporters to stop acting like sycophants and start acting like adults and hold their own to account.

Again, thanks for the edumication.

---

You are welcome. The UCMJ is a completely different animal than statutory criminal law. It is more a Code of Conduct for military members (and their families as active duty are held responsible for the conduct of their dependents) that is 24/7/365 not just work related.

Even first amendment rights are curtailed in that you can say what you want but not when active and in uniform.

---

When my dad was stationed overseas the crimes committed by their son resulted in the family being sent back to the US. Indeed the Code of Conduct was followed in the early 1960s.

Jock 07 said:

---

USA*** said:

---

will25u said:

---

The seditious 6 would be proud as they see their efforts produce these kinds of results within the ranks.

Army JAG officer MAJ Baker has been very vocal about her dissension on social media for months, and now she’s publicly stating she will not comply with lawful orders she… pic.twitter.com/OcAmsYNBs2

— Shoe (@samosaur) November 25, 2025

---

Hmmm...sounds like Article 32 /89 or 90 time for this foul mouthed Maj.

---

indeed, this will be an interesting case to follow. Will be quite telling if the video is referenced in defense of her actions.

---

In most of the various service elements, it would be quick and final based on the the shown e-mails/SM text. Don't know about the JAG world, even though the same UCMJ applies to them as well. If these e-mails were to a superior officer, not sure how they could be defended...especially the fling about "one of your cronies".

It's one thing to question orders because you have a legitimate military reason based in fact and experience (and it's your job to make sure the mission is successful and to help your boss see all angles), but once the boss says "execute" then all BS is over and you execute said orders and carry them out to the best of your ability. That includes fixing anything that goes wrong.

The impression I get with this Maj is that she has reached her Peter Principle" rank, has been an issue in the past, and knows she is done in the ARMY. So she thinks she's going out like a hero.