Convention of States

5,780 Views | 76 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by schmellba99
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How does a CoS deal with a King, though?

We obviously have a King, or else the liberals wouldn't be having "No Kings!" riots.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOYAL AG said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

I would be 100% on board with repealing the 19th. It will destroy us. There's a reason almost every civilization and religion throughout time banned females from certain roles/positions. I realize there are millions of exceptions (aka perfectly reasonable and intelligent women who actually 'think' rather than only 'feel'), and I'm sure in ancient times they did too, and maybe felt sorry for the minority of women who had their heads on straight…but they knew most could not be trusted in those roles. In general, women SUCK at staying informed, having healthy priorities for a society, and at voting. Sorry, my honest opinion. For every Annie88, there's at least 20 women who just have zero clue.


This is what happens with out of control hubris.


How does the female vote make our country better?


How does the male vote? Black vote? White vote? Jewish vote? Muslim vote?


Male vote


You're pinning it all our problems on the 19th Amendment but the basis of our destruction was 1913 which saw the 16th and 17th ratified and the creation of the Federal Reserve. Since 16 and 17 are before 19 I'd say those things were brought about exclusively by men. The Progressive Era definitely started long before the 19th Amendment was ratified. Yes white liberal women are a problem but let's not pretend we're here exclusively because women are allowed to vote.


Fair enough, tbh I'm biased. I despise white liberal women with a passion. They are probably the greatest threat to western civilization. You are not wrong though.
Aggie Infantry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The New Bill of Rights
1. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
2. The right of the people to practice their religious beliefs shall not be infringed.
3. The right of the people to speak, publish, print, broadcast, or express opinion, information, and/or news shall not be infringed.
4. The right of the people to peaceably petition their government through peaceable assembly shall not be infringed.
5. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, property, wealth, and data against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be infringed.
6. The right of the people to a speedy and public trial by their peers, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to confront the witnesses against them, shall not be infringed.
7. The right of the people to be protected from excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments shall not be infringed
8. No person shall be subject to more than one trial or one punishment for the same offense.
9. No person shall be compelled in any criminal case, to be a witness against them self, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.
10. The powers delegated by the people, through this Constitution, to the government of the United States, shall be exercised as therein appropriated, so that the Legislative shall never exercise the powers vested in the Executive or Judicial; nor the Executive the powers vested in the Legislative or Judicial; nor the Judicial the powers vested in the Legislative or Executive.
11. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
12. Congress shall make no law exempting any class or group of people.
13. Congress shall not spend more than is collected in taxation.
14. Congress shall not delegate law or regulatory making authority to any agency.
15. Personal, inheritance, or corporate federal taxes shall not exceed 10%.
16. Terms for Representatives shall be no more than six years. No State shall appoint a Senator for more than two terms.
When the truth comes out, do not ask me how I knew.
Ask yourself why you did not.
taxpreparer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOYAL AG said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

I would be 100% on board with repealing the 19th. It will destroy us. There's a reason almost every civilization and religion throughout time banned females from certain roles/positions. I realize there are millions of exceptions (aka perfectly reasonable and intelligent women who actually 'think' rather than only 'feel'), and I'm sure in ancient times they did too, and maybe felt sorry for the minority of women who had their heads on straight…but they knew most could not be trusted in those roles. In general, women SUCK at staying informed, having healthy priorities for a society, and at voting. Sorry, my honest opinion. For every Annie88, there's at least 20 women who just have zero clue.


This is what happens with out of control hubris.


How does the female vote make our country better?


How does the male vote? Black vote? White vote? Jewish vote? Muslim vote?


Male vote


You're pinning it all our problems on the 19th Amendment but the basis of our destruction was 1913 which saw the 16th and 17th ratified and the creation of the Federal Reserve. Since 16 and 17 are before 19 I'd say those things were brought about exclusively by men. The Progressive Era definitely started long before the 19th Amendment was ratified. Yes white liberal women are a problem but let's not pretend we're here exclusively because women are allowed to vote.


I am all in favor of repealing the 16th & 17th amendments (have been since the early 80s.). The 19yh is irrelevant as the constitution did not prohibit women from voting. WY allowed women to vote in 1869.

Return the power of the Senate to the states and eliminate federal direct taxation of citizens. Require each state to fund the federal government based on its percentage of the Electoral college. This would make each representative more accountable to its district.
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
taxpreparer said:

LOYAL AG said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

I would be 100% on board with repealing the 19th. It will destroy us. There's a reason almost every civilization and religion throughout time banned females from certain roles/positions. I realize there are millions of exceptions (aka perfectly reasonable and intelligent women who actually 'think' rather than only 'feel'), and I'm sure in ancient times they did too, and maybe felt sorry for the minority of women who had their heads on straight…but they knew most could not be trusted in those roles. In general, women SUCK at staying informed, having healthy priorities for a society, and at voting. Sorry, my honest opinion. For every Annie88, there's at least 20 women who just have zero clue.


This is what happens with out of control hubris.


How does the female vote make our country better?


How does the male vote? Black vote? White vote? Jewish vote? Muslim vote?


Male vote


You're pinning it all our problems on the 19th Amendment but the basis of our destruction was 1913 which saw the 16th and 17th ratified and the creation of the Federal Reserve. Since 16 and 17 are before 19 I'd say those things were brought about exclusively by men. The Progressive Era definitely started long before the 19th Amendment was ratified. Yes white liberal women are a problem but let's not pretend we're here exclusively because women are allowed to vote.


I am all in favor of repealing the 16th & 17th amendments (have been since the early 80s.). The 19yh is irrelevant as the constitution did not prohibit women from voting. WY allowed women to vote in 1869.

Return the power of the Senate to the states and eliminate federal direct taxation of citizens. Require each state to fund the federal government based on its percentage of the Electoral college. This would make each representative more accountable to its district.


I'm in. Anything that returns power to the states and the people.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Richleau12 said:

The framers put article five into the constitution for a reason. It's a check on the federal government by the states. I think it's quite clear that Congress is derelict in their duties. It's time we put pressure on them to clean up the mess they have created. It can be done with three simple and easy amendments.

1. Term limits
2. Single appropriation bills
3. Ban stock trading in Congress

We all know Congress will not willfully do this on their own and that's ok. What's not ok is not exercising our right as citizens to counter this behavior. These are 90-10 issues. I firmly believe we can get 34 states to agree on these three needed amendments. We must utilize our power to check the federal government. We can do it. What's odd is it's the easiest time in our nation to accomplish this task with rise of technology and communication and yet likewise the most difficult as we are pushed and pulled in some many directions.

To quote braveheart, "unite!" Let's exercise our right to check the endless powers of the federal government.

The idea of today's politicians forming a constitutional convention to "fix" or rewrite the constitution is absolutely terrifying to me.

Hard.F'n.Pass on that nonsense.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why should my inheritance be taxed at anything above 0%? Why should what I have worked my entire life for, and already paid taxes on, be taxed yet again at anything above 0% when my time on earth is done?

Why should my labor be taxed at anything above 0%?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.